Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Isolation, Identification, and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains from Various Clinical Samples in a University Hospital in Northern Cyprus

Pages
225–228
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Antimicrobial surveillance should be done periodically to detect current resistance in our local area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND/AIMS Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a severe opportunistic bacterium responsible for frequently lethal nosocomial infections.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIALS and METHODS A total of 152 samples were collected from various departments of the hospital, which included wound, blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), sputum, aspiration fluid, and ear, nose, and throat swab samples.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Antimicrobial surveillance should be done periodically to detect current resistance in our local area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:152 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

BACKGROUND/AIMS Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a severe opportunistic bacterium responsible for frequently lethal nosocomial infections. It is highly resistant to commonly used antibiotics, creating a real challenge in the treatment of nosocomial infections. MATERIALS and METHODS A total of 152 samples were collected from various departments of the hospital, which included wound, blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), sputum, aspiration fluid, and ear, nose, and throat swab samples. The susceptibility pattern of bacteria was determined by using the BD Phoenix 100 automated microbiology system. P. aeruginosa was also identified according to its cultural, microscopic, morphological, and biochemical characteristics. RESULTS Samples were identified by using BD Phoenix 100 and conventional biochemical tests are used for confirmation. The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing indicated that P. aeruginosa was sensitive to piperacillin–tazobactam (92.5%), meropenem (87.2%), colistin (86.7%), ticarcillin–clavulanate (86.6%), amikacin (81.5%), imipenem (80.8%), norfloxacin (79.5%), cefepime (78.4%), ceftazidime (76.0%), gentamicin (76.0%), levofloxacin (73.5%), and ciprofloxacin (73.2%). On the other hand, the resistance rates of amoxicillin, ampicillin–sulbactam, cefuroxime, nitrofurantoin, cefoxitin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and ceftriaxone were found to be 100%, 98.7%, 97.7%, 97.7%, 94.7%, 94.7%, and 93.8% respectively. The prevalence of antibiotic susceptibility of P. aeruginosa in Cyprus is more in males (62.5%) than in females (37.5%). CONCLUSION Knowledge about local antimicrobial resistance patterns of P. aeruginosa is essential for the guidance of empirical therapy by physicians, medical microbiologists, and public health officials. Antimicrobial surveillance should be done periodically to detect current resistance in our local area.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULLAH, N., GÜLER, E., GÜVENİR, M., ARIKAN, A., SÜER, K. (2019). Isolation, Identification, and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains from Various Clinical Samples in a University Hospital in Northern Cyprus. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 225–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/151709

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Ekrem K, Rokan DK. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from various clinical specimens. Sky Journal of Microbiology Research Vol 2014; 2(2): 13-7
  2. Fazeli H, Akbar R, Moghim, S, Nariman TB, Arabestan RA, Ghoddousi AR. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in patients, hospital means, and personnel’s specimens. J Res Med Sci 2012; 17(4): 332-7
  3. Lister PD, Wolter DJ, Hanson ND. Antibacterial-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: clinical impact and complex regulation of chromosomally encoded resistance mechanisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2009; 22(4): 582-610. [CrossRef] 4. Shaikh S, Fatima J, Shakil S, Danish Rizvi SM, Kamal MA. Prevalence of multidrug resistant and extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a tertiary care hospital. Saudi J Biol Sci 2015; 22(1): 62-4. [CrossRef] 5. Gaouar-Borsali N, Gauar-Yadi M, Babaahmed Z, Drissi M. Antibiotic resistance study of some clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa characterization by conjugation and cleaning out of plasmid. Der Pharma Chemica 2012; 4(3): 1160-3
  4. Ak S, Yıldız F, Gündüz A, Köroğlu M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Suşlarının Antibiyotiklere Duyarlılıklarının Vitek 2 Otomatize Sistem ile Değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Med J 2016; 27: 62-4. [CrossRef] 7. Hirsch EB, Tam VH. Impact of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection on patient outcomes. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2010; 10(4): 441-51. [CrossRef] 8. Paranjothi S, Dheepa R. Screening for multidrug resistance bacteria pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitalized patient in hosur krishnagiri (DT). Int J Pharma Bio Sci 2010; 1(3): 1-15
  5. Öztürk CE, Albayrak HT, Altınöz A, Ankaralı H. Pseudomonas aeruginosa suşlarında antibiyotiklere direnç ve beta-laktamaz oranları. Ankem Derg 2010; 24(3): 117-23
  6. Premalatha DE, Siddesh KC, Halesh LH, Koppad M, Prakash N. Antibiotic resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from clinical specimens in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Recent Trends Sci Techn 2015; 13(3): 481-3
  7. Jafar K, Wahab A, Qayyum A, Jamshed S. Drug resistance pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates at PIMS Hospital, Islamabad. J Chem Pharm Res 2014; 6(11): 715-9
  8. Al-Hasan MN, Wilson JW, Lahr BD, Eckel-Passow JE, Baddour LM. Incidence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: a population-based study. Am J Med 2008; 121(8): 702-8. [CrossRef] 13. Aykan ŞB, Çiftçi İH. Changes in antibiotis resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isoates over the pas