Journals / Bezmiâlem Science / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Treatment of Root Surface Covering By Acellular Dermal Matrix

Kök Yüzey Örtülmesinin Asellüler Dermal Matriks ile Tedavisi

Pages
206–211
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to this, the use of acellular dermal ma- trix along with coronal position flap can be evaluated as an alter- native for autogenous donor area.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With increase in esthetic expectations, the treatment of gingival recessions has gained importance in last few years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this treatment is to cover root surface and gain satisfactory es- thetical results.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to this, the use of acellular dermal ma- trix along with coronal position flap can be evaluated as an alter- native for autogenous donor area.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

With increase in esthetic expectations, the treatment of gingival recessions has gained importance in last few years. The aim of this treatment is to cover root surface and gain satisfactory es- thetical results. Today there are many surgical methods available for this purpose. The use of sub-epithelial connective tissue graft with coronal position flap is the gold standard in the treatment of gingival recessions. However, there are some drawbacks, such as limited donor area of sub-epithelial connective tissue graft and existence of the second operational area. In order to overcome these disadvantages, acellular dermal matrixes are used in peri- odontal plastic surgeries as alternatives to autogenous grafts. In single tooth Miller Class I and Class II gum recessions, the best predictable results can be obtained by sub-epithelial connective tissue grafts. In addition to this, the use of acellular dermal ma- trix along with coronal position flap can be evaluated as an alter- native for autogenous donor area.

Özet

Son yıllarda estetik beklentilerin artmasıyla birlikte dişeti çekilmele- rinin tedavisi, önemli bir tedavi şekli haline gelmiştir. Bu tedavinin hedefi kök yüzeyinin örtülmesini sağlamak ve memnuniyet verici estetik sonuçları elde etmektir. Bu amaçla kullanılan birçok cerrahi yöntem bulunmaktadır. Bu tedavi yöntemleri arasında, koronale po- zisyone flep ile birlikte subepitelyal bağ dokusu greftinin kullanımı dişeti çekilmelerinin tedavisinde altın standart olarak kabul edilmek- tedir. Ancak subepitelyal bağ dokusu greftinin verici bölgenin kısıtlı olması, ikinci cerrahi bölgenin olması gibi bazı dezavantajları bulun- maktadır. Bu dezavantajları ortadan kaldırabilmek amacıyla asellüler dermal matriksler otojen greftlere bir alternatif olarak periodontal plastik cerrahi işlemlerde kullanılmaktadır. Tek diş Miller Sınıf I ve II dişeti çekilmelerinde en iyi öngörülebilir sonuçlar subepitelyal bağdokusu grefti ile alınmaktadır. Buna ilave olarak koronale pozis- yone flep ile birlikte asellüler dermal matriks kullanımı otojen verici bölge için bir alternatif olarak değerlendirilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

NAZAROĞLU, K., ÇELİK, T. Z., ŞIRALI, A., SEZER, U. (2018). Treatment of Root Surface Covering By Acellular Dermal Matrix. Bezmiâlem Science, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 206–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/151604

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Periodontology AAo. Glossary of Periodontal Terms. 4 ed. Chi- cago, IL 2001.P.44. Albandar JM, Kingman A. Gingival recession, gingival blee- ding, and dental calculus in adults 30 years of age and older in the United States, 1988-1994. J Periodontol 1999; 70: 30-43. [CrossRef ] Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Cohen RE. Toothbrushing and gingival recession. Int Dent J 2003; 53: 67-72. [CrossRef ] Yoneyama T, Okamoto H, Lindhe J, Socransky SS, Haffajee AD. Probing depth, attachment loss and gingival recession. Findings from a clinical examination in Ushiku, Japan. J Clin Periodontol 1988; 15: 581-91. [CrossRef ] Novaes AB, Ruben MP, Kon S, Goldman HM, Novaes AB, Jr. The development of the periodontal cleft. A clinical and histo- pathologic study. J Periodontol 1975; 46: 701-9. [CrossRef ] Khocht A, Simon G, Person P, Denepitiya JL. Gingival recessi- on in relation to history of hard toothbrush use. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 900-5. [CrossRef ] Wilson RD. Marginal tissue recession in general dental prac- tice: a preliminary study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1983; 3: 40-53.
  2. Baelum V, Fejerskov O, Karring T. Oral hygiene, gingivitis and periodontal breakdown in adult Tanzanians. J Periodontal Res 1986; 21: 221-32. [CrossRef ] Loe H, Anerud A, Boysen H. The natural history of periodontal disease in man: prevalence, severity, and extent of gingival reces- sion. J Periodontol 1992; 63: 489-95. [CrossRef ] Serino G, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J, Eneroth L. The preva- lence and distribution of gingival recession in subjects with a high standard of oral hygiene. J Clin Periodontol 1994; 21: 57-63. [CrossRef ] Lawrence HP, Hunt RJ, Beck JD. Three-year root caries inci- dence and risk modeling in older adults in North Carolina. J Public Health Dent 1995; 55: 69-78. [CrossRef ] Al-Wahadni A, Linden GJ. Dentine hypersensitivity in Jorda- nian dental attenders. A case control study. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29: 688-93. [CrossRef ] Nizam NA, A. Dişeti Çekilmelerinin Tedavisinde Mikrocerra- hi: Literatür Derlemesi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2014; 24: 283-90.
  3. Nieri M, Pini Prato GP, Giani M, Magnani N, Pagliaro U, Rotundo R. Patient perceptions of buccal gingival recessions and requests for treatment. J Clin Periodontol 2013; 40: 707- 12. [CrossRef ] Andrade PF, Felipe ME, Novaes AB, Jr., Souza SL, Taba M, Jr., Palioto DB, et al. Comparison between two surgical techniques for root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix graft. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 263-9. [Cros