SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Operations Management / 2017 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Operations Management FACILITY LOCATION SELECTION PROBLEM: AN APPLICATION FOR STUDENT SELECTION AND PLACEMENT CENTERS

İlknur Güneşli(İlknur GÜNEŞLİ*, , Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Mete Gündoğan(İlknur GÜNEŞLİ*, , Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Alper Şeker(İlknur GÜNEŞLİ*, , Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Endüstri Mühendisliği Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)
Pages
27–38
Publication Date
2017-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

DSS, then, uses AHP decision hierarchy to rank the feasible stents in the second phase

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a two-phase stent selection decision support system (DSS) is developed to help the physicians in their stent selection decisions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The results were evaluated by means of MINITAB14 program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:DSS, then, uses AHP decision hierarchy to rank the feasible stents in the second phase
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Stent selection · Multi-Criteria · Stent selection

Abstract

In this study, a two-phase stent selection decision support system (DSS) is developed to help the physicians in their stent selection decisions. Firstly, a questionnaire was conducted to developed decision support system. Questions are randomly applied to cardiology department physicians in the province of Ankara, which is selected as pilot area, to get the results to be statistically valid. The results were evaluated by means of MINITAB14 program. In development of DSS, an independent set of criteria is obtained first and arranged in the Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) decision hierarchy. In the first elimination phase of the DSS, the physician obtains the feasible set of stents by providing limited values for the 13 requirements. DSS, then, uses AHP decision hierarchy to rank the feasible stents in the second phase

🔖

Cite This Article

Güneşli, İ., Gündoğan, M., Şeker, A. (2017). Operations Management FACILITY LOCATION SELECTION PROBLEM: AN APPLICATION FOR STUDENT SELECTION AND PLACEMENT CENTERS. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 27–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/1515783

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Kahraman Cengiz, Ruan Da and Doğan İbrahim, “Fuzzy Group Decision-Making For Facility Location Selection”, Information Science, Vol 157, 2003, s.135-153.
  2. Kodalı Rambabu and Routroy Srikanta, “Decision Framework for Selection of Facilities Location in Competitive Supply Chain”, Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, Vol 5, No 1, 2006, s. 89-110.
  3. Kuo R.J., Chı S.C., and Kao S.S., “A Decision Support System for Locating Convenience Store Through Fuzzy AHP”, Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol 37, 1999, s. 323–326.
  4. MacCarthy B.L. and Atthirawong W.,“Factors Affecting Location Decisions in International Operations- A Delphi Study”, International Journal of Operations Production Management, Vol 23, No 7, 2003.
  5. Wu Cheng-Ru., Lin Chin-Tsei. and Chen Huang-Chu, “Optimal Selection of Location For Taiwanese Hospitals To Ensure a Competitive Advantage By Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process And Sensitivity Analysis”, Building And Environment, Vol 42, 2007, s. 1431-1444.
  6. Yang Jiaqin and Lee Huei, “An AHP Decision Model for Facility Location Selection”, Facilities,Vol 15, No 9-10, 1997, s. 241-254. Zahir M.Sajjad., “Incorporating The Uncertainty of Decision Judgements in The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 53, No 2, 1991, s. 206-216.
  7. Emrouznejad, Ali, Marra Marianna, “The state of the art development of AHP (1979–2017): a literature review with a social network analysis” Vol. 55, No. 22, 6653–6675, 2017.