Journals / Journal of Turkish Operations Management / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

A Literature Review on Potential Decision Problems for Vehicle Sharing Systems

Barış Keçeci(BAŞKENT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2730-5993
Pages
1513–1530
Publication Date
2023-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study aims to provide the researchers with a general perspective on the topic by examining the studies on VSS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Vehicle Sharing (VS) is a car rental model where people rent vehicles for short periods, usually hourly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:VSS's are examined under four sub-headings due to how they operate: preferred travel type, vehicle imbalance management strategy, pricing strategy, and parking organization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study aims to provide the researchers with a general perspective on the topic by examining the studies on VSS.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Vehicle sharing systems · Classification · Configuration

Abstract

Vehicle Sharing (VS) is a car rental model where people rent vehicles for short periods, usually hourly. In this system, users can reserve a vehicle and have a short-term use, and the stages of receiving and delivering the vehicle belong to the person himself. Vehicle Sharing Systems (VSS), on the other hand, are systems that include a fleet of vehicles with small and medium sizes for use by a relatively large group of members. VSS are divided into five groups according to the vehicles used; such as Bicycle Sharing Systems (BSS), Car Sharing Systems (CSS), Autonomous Connected Electric Vehicle Sharing Systems (ACEV-SS), Electric Car Sharing Systems (eCSS), and Electric Small Vehicles Sharing Systems (ESVSS). VSS's are examined under four sub-headings due to how they operate: preferred travel type, vehicle imbalance management strategy, pricing strategy, and parking organization. In this study, decision problems encountered at strategic, tactical, and operational levels for CSS are determined and the existing studies in the literature are examined. The CSSs in these studies are classified according to their functioning types. In addition, decision problems are determined by examining the studies available in the literature for eCSS, and the eCSS in these studies are classified according to their functioning types. This study aims to provide the researchers with a general perspective on the topic by examining the studies on VSS.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akpınar, İ. D., Keçeci, B. (2023). A Literature Review on Potential Decision Problems for Vehicle Sharing Systems. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 1513–1530. https://ajindex.com/articles/1515709

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (62)

  1. Albiński, S., Fontaine, P., & Minner, S. (2018). Performance analysis of a hybrid bike sharing system: A service-level-based approach under censored demand observations. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 116, 59-69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.05.011
  2. Almuhtady, A., Lee, S., Romeijn, E., Wynblatt, M., & Ni, J. (2014). A degradation-informed battery-swapping policy for fleets of electric or hybrid-electric vehicles. Transportation Science, 48(4), 609-618. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2013.0494
  3. Ataç, S., Obrenović, N., & Bierlaire, M. (2021). Vehicle sharing systems: A review and a holistic management framework. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 10, 100033. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejtl.2021.100033
  4. Barth, M., & Shaheen, S. A. (2002). Shared-use vehicle systems: Framework for classifying carsharing, station cars, and combined approaches. Transportation Research Record, 1791(1), 105-112. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1791-16
  5. Barth, M., & Todd, M. (1999). Simulation model performance analysis of a multiple station shared vehicle system. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 7(4), 237-259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(99)00021-2
  6. Barth, M., & Todd, M. (2001). User behavior evaluation of an intelligent shared electric vehicle system. Transportation Research Record, 1760(1), 145-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1760-1
  7. Barth, M., Shaheen, S. A., Fukuda, T., & Fukuda, A. (2006). Carsharing and station cars in Asia: Overview of Japan and Singapore. Transportation Research Record, 1986(1), 106-115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106198600114
  8. Barth, M., Todd, M., & Xue, L. (2004). User-based vehicle relocation techniques for multiple-station shared-use vehicle systems. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.360.8614 Bird marks one year anniversary with 10 millionth environmentally-friendly ride, (2018). Retrieved from https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bird-marks-one-year-anniversary-with-10-millionth-environmentally-friendly-ride-300715767.html
  9. Boyacı, B., & Zografos, K. G. (2019). Investigating the effect of temporal and spatial flexibility on the performance of one-way electric carsharing systems. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 129, 244-272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.09.003
  10. Boyacı, B., Zografos, K. G., & Geroliminis, N. (2015). An optimization framework for the development of efficient one-way car-sharing systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 240(3), 718-733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.07.020
  11. Boyacı, B., Zografos, K. G., & Geroliminis, N. (2017). An integrated optimization-simulation framework for vehicle and personnel relocations of electric carsharing systems with reservations. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 95, 214-237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.10.007
  12. Brandstätter, G., Gambella, C., Leitner, M., Malaguti, E., Masini, F., Puchinger, J.,. & Vigo, D. (2016). Overview of optimization problems in electric car-sharing system design and management. In Dynamic perspectives on managerial decision making (pp. 441-471). Springer, Cham. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-39120-5_24
  13. Cai, L., Wang, X., Luo, Z., & Liang, Y. (2022). A hybrid adaptive large neighborhood search and tabu search algorithm for the electric vehicle relocation problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 167, 108005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108005
  14. Cavadas, J., de Almeida Correia, G. H., & Gouveia, J. (2015). A MIP model for locating slow-charging stations for electric vehicles in urban areas accounting for driver tours. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 75, 188-201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.11.005
  15. Celsor, C., & Millard-Ball, A. (2007). Where does carsharing work? Using geographic information systems to assess market potential. Transportation Research Record, 1992(1), 61-69. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1992-08
  16. Chow, Y., Yu, J. Y., & Pavone, M. (2015). Two Phase $ Q-$ learning for Bidding-based Vehicle Sharing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.08932. doi: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1509.08932 Costain, C., Ardron, C., & Habib, K. N. (2012). Synopsis of users’ behaviour of a carsharing program: A case study in Toronto. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(3), 421-434. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.005
  17. de Almeida Correia, G. H., & Antunes, A. P. (2012). Optimization approach to depot location and trip selection in one-way carsharing systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 48(1), 233-247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2011.06.003
  18. Efthymiou, D., Antoniou, C., & Waddell, P. (2012). Which factors affect the willingness to join vehicle sharing systems? Evidence from young Greek drivers. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting. Retrieved from https://trid.trb.org/view/1129049
  19. Enzi, M., Parragh, S. N., Pisinger, D., & Prandtstetter, M. (2021). Modeling and solving the multimodal car-and ride-sharing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 293(1), 290-303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.11.046
  20. Fan, W., Machemehl, R. B., & Lownes, N. E. (2008). Carsharing: Dynamic decision-making problem for vehicle allocation. Transportation Research Record, 2063(1), 97-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2063-12
  21. Ferrero, F., Perboli, G., Rosano, M., & Vesco, A. (2018). Car-sharing services: An annotated review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 37, 501-518. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.020
  22. Firnkorn, J., & Müller, M. (2011). What will be the environmental effects of new free-floating car-sharing systems? The case of car2go in Ulm. Ecological economics, 70(8), 1519-1528. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.014
  23. Golalikhani, M., Oliveira, B. B., Carravilla, M. A., Oliveira, J. F., & Antunes, A. P. (2021). Carsharing: A review of academic literature and business practices toward an integrated decision-support framework. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 149, 102280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102280
  24. Huang, K., de Almeida Correia, G. H., & An, K. (2018). Solving the station-based one-way carsharing network planning problem with relocations and non-linear demand. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 90, 1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.020
  25. Jorge, D., & Correia, G. (2013). Carsharing systems demand estimation and defined operations: a literature review. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 13(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2013.13.3.2999
  26. Jorge, D., Barnhart, C., & de Almeida Correia, G. H. (2015). Assessing the viability of enabling a round-trip carsharing system to accept one-way trips: Application to Logan Airport in Boston. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 56, 359-372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.04.020
  27. Jorge, D., Correia, G. H., & Barnhart, C. (2014). Comparing optimal relocation operations with simulated relocation policies in one-way carsharing systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(4), 1667-1675. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2304358
  28. Jorge, D., Molnar, G., & de Almeida Correia, G. H. (2015). Trip pricing of one-way station-based carsharing networks with zone and time of day price variations. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 81, 461-482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.06.003
  29. Kim, J., Rasouli, S., & Timmermans, H. (2017). Satisfaction and uncertainty in car-sharing decisions: An integration of hybrid choice and random regret-based models. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95, 13-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.005
  30. Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr
  31. Kumar, P., & Bierlaire, M. (2012). Optimizing locations for a vehicle sharing system. In Swiss Transport Research Conference (No. CONF). Retrieved from https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/195890
  32. Lai, K., Chen, T., & Natarajan, B. (2020). Optimal scheduling of electric vehicles car-sharing service with multi-temporal and multi-task operation. Energy, 204, 117929. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117929
  33. Lawler, R. (2012). Zipcar for Scooters. Startup Scoot Networks Launches to the Public in San Francisco. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2012/09/26/scoot-sf-launch/
  34. Li, L., Pantelidis, T., Chow, J. Y., & Jabari, S. E. (2021). A real-time dispatching strategy for shared automated electric vehicles with performance guarantees. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 152, 102392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102392
  35. Litman, T. (2000). Evaluating carsharing benefits. Transportation Research Record, 1702(1), 31-35. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1702-04
  36. Martin, E. W., & Shaheen, S. A. (2011). Greenhouse gas emission impacts of carsharing in North America. IEEE Transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 12(4), 1074-1086. doi: https://10.1109/TITS.2011.2158539
  37. Martínez, L. M., Correia, G. H. D. A., Moura, F., & Mendes Lopes, M. (2017). Insights into carsharing demand dynamics: Outputs of an agent-based model application to Lisbon, Portugal. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(2), 148-159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2016.1226997
  38. Miao, H., Jia, H., Li, J., & Qiu, T. Z. (2019). Autonomous connected electric vehicle (ACEV)-based car-sharing system modeling and optimal planning: A unified two-stage multi-objective optimization methodology. Energy, 169, 797-818. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.066
  39. Mitchell, W. J., Borroni-Bird, C. E., & Burns, L. D. (2010). Reinventing the automobile: Personal urban mobility for the 21st century. MIT press. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=32
  40. Münzel, K., Boon, W., Frenken, K., Blomme, J., & van der Linden, D. (2020). Explaining carsharing supply across Western European cities. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(4), 243-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1542756
  41. Nair, R., & Miller-Hooks, E. (2011). Fleet management for vehicle sharing operations. Transportation Science, 45(4), 524-540. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1100.0347
  42. Nguyen, T. K., Hoang, N. H., & Vu, H. L. (2022). A unified activity-based framework for one-way car-sharing services in multi-modal transportation networks. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 157, 102551. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102551
  43. Nourinejad, M., & Roorda, M. J. (2014). A dynamic carsharing decision support system. Transportation research part E: logistics and transportation review, 66, 36-50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.03.003
  44. Nourinejad, M., Zhu, S., Bahrami, S., & Roorda, M. J. (2015). Vehicle relocation and staff rebalancing in one-way carsharing systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 81, 98-113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.06.012
  45. Rossi, F., Zhang, R., Hindy, Y., & Pavone, M. (2018). Routing autonomous vehicles in congested transportation networks: Structural properties and coordination algorithms. Autonomous Robots, 42(7), 1427-1442. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-018-9750-5
  46. Santos, G., & Correia, G. (2015). A MIP model to optimize real time maintenance and relocation operations in one-way carsharing systems. Transportation Research Procedia, 10, 384-392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.088
  47. Schuster, T. D., Byrne, J., Corbett, J., & Schreuder, Y. (2005). Assessing the potential extent of carsharing: A new method and its implications. Transportation research record, 1927(1), 174-181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105192700120 Shaheen, S. A., & Cohen, A. P. (2007). Growth in worldwide carsharing: An international comparison. Transportation Research Record, 1992(1), 81-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1992-10
  48. Shaheen, S. A., & Cohen, A. P. (2013). Carsharing and personal vehicle services: worldwide market developments and emerging trends. International journal of sustainable transportation, 7(1), 5-34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.660103
  49. Shaheen, S. A., Cohen, A. P., & Chung, M. S. (2009). North American carsharing: 10-year retrospective. Transportation Research Record, 2110(1), 35-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2110-0
  50. Shaheen, S. A., Cohen, A. P., & Roberts, J. D. (2006). Carsharing in North America: Market growth, current developments, and future potential. Transportation Research Record, 1986(1), 116-124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981061986001
  51. Shaheen, S. A., Guzman, S., & Zhang, H. (2010). Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: past, present, and future. Transportation research record, 2143(1), 159-167. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2143-20
  52. Shaheen, S. A., Sperling, D., & Wagner, C. (1999). A Short History of Carsharing in the 90's. Journal of World Transport Policy and Practice, 5(3), 16-37. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6p3305b0
  53. Sun, X., Tang, W., Chen, J., & Zhang, J. (2020). Optimal investment strategy of a free-floating sharing platform. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 138, 101958. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101958
  54. Wang, Y. W., & Lin, C. C. (2013). Locating multiple types of recharging stations for battery-powered electric vehicle transport. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 58, 76-87. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2013.07.003
  55. Weikl, S., & Bogenberger, K. (2015). A practice-ready relocation model for free-floating carsharing systems with electric vehicles–Mesoscopic approach and field trial results. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 57, 206-223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.06.024
  56. Worley, O., Klabjan, D., & Sweda, T. M. (2012, March). Simultaneous vehicle routing and charging station siting for commercial electric vehicles. In 2012 IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference (pp. 1-3). IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/IEVC.2012.6183279
  57. Xu, J. X., & Lim, J. S. (2007, September). A new evolutionary neural network for forecasting net flow of a car sharing system. In 2007 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation (pp. 1670-1676). IEEE. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2007.4424674 Xu, M., & Meng, Q. (2019). Fleet sizing for one-way electric carsharing services considering dynamic vehicle relocation and nonlinear charging profile. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 128, 23-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.07.016
  58. Xu, M., Meng, Q., & Liu, Z. (2018). Electric vehicle fleet size and trip pricing for one-way carsharing services considering vehicle relocation and personnel assignment. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 111, 60-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.03.001
  59. Yang, J., & Sun, H. (2015). Battery swap station location-routing problem with capacitated electric vehicles. Computers & operations research, 55, 217-232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2014.07.003
  60. Zhang, D., Liu, Y., & He, S. (2019). Vehicle assignment and relays for one-way electric car-sharing systems. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 120, 125-146. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.12.004
  61. Zhao, M., Li, X., Yin, J., Cui, J., Yang, L., & An, S. (2018). An integrated framework for electric vehicle rebalancing and staff relocation in one-way carsharing systems: Model formulation and Lagrangian relaxation-based solution approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 117, 542-572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.09.014
  62. Brandstätter, G., Gambella, C., Leitner, M., Malaguti, E., Masini, F., Puchinger, J.,. & Vigo, D. (2016). Overview of optimization problems in electric car-sharing system design and management. In Dynamic perspectives on managerial decision making (pp. 441-471). Springer, Cham. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-39120-5_24