SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Operations Management / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

A Bibliometric Research in Web of Science Database: Articles on Occupational Safety

Web of Science Veri Tabanında Bibliyometrik Bir Araştırma: İş Güvenliği Makaleleri

Hatice Özdemir(KAYSERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MUSTAFA ÇIKRIKÇIOĞLU MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0003-4449-2433
Ramazan Kayabaşı(KAYSERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TOMARZA MUSTAFA AKINCIOĞLU MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0001-6195-7445
Pages
290–306
Publication Date
2024-07-18
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the network maps, keywords, publications and related issues of the studies in the field of occupational safety were examined with the current literature

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Occupational health and safety attracts the attention of many researchers from different fields of study due to its interdisciplinary nature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the analysis, a data set of 8,271 articles in the field of occupational safety was created and the data were presented in the form of tables and figures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the network maps, keywords, publications and related issues of the studies in the field of occupational safety were examined with the current literature
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bibliyometrik Analiz · İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği · İş Güvenliği

Abstract

Occupational health and safety attracts the attention of many researchers from different fields of study due to its interdisciplinary nature. Elimination of physical, chemical, biological, ergonomic, psychosocial and similar hazards in the work area is possible with occupational health and safety activities. In this research, the bibliometric features of the articles written in the field of occupational safety, which are included in the SCI, SSCI and A&HCI citation indexes in the Web of Science database, were examined. As a result of the analysis, a data set of 8,271 articles in the field of occupational safety was created and the data were presented in the form of tables and figures. VOSviewer software was used to analyze and visualize the relationships between keywords, commonly cited journals, authors, and sources. The most used keyword is the word "job security", which gives the field its name. It has been observed that a total of 24,410 authors contributed to this field and 1,909 journals were the source of the articles. It was determined that the country with the highest number of publications was “USA”, the author with the highest contribution was “Arcury”, the journal with the highest number of articles was “Safety Science” and the most effective institution was “Center for Disease Control Prevention”. In this study, the network maps, keywords, publications and related issues of the studies in the field of occupational safety were examined with the current literature

Özet

İş sağlığı ve güvenliği, disiplinler arası doğası nedeniyle farklı çalışma alanlarından pek çok araştırmacının ilgisini çekmektedir. Çalışma alanında bulunan fiziksel, kimyasal, biyolojik, ergonomik, psikososyal ve benzeri tehlikelerin ortadan kaldırılması iş sağlığı ve güvenliği faaliyetleri ile mümkün olmaktadır. Bu araştırmada, Web of Science veri tabanında SCI, SSCI ve A&HCI atıf indeksleri içerisinde yer alan, iş güvenliği alanında yazılmış makalelerinin bibliyometrik özellikleri incelenmiştir. Analiz sonucunda iş güvenliği alanında 8.271 makale veri seti oluşturulmuş olup veriler tablolar ve şekiller biçiminde sunulmuştur. Anahtar kelimeler, ortak atıf yapılan dergiler, yazarlar ve kaynaklar arasındaki ilişkileri analiz etmek ve görselleştirmek için VOSviewer yazılımı kullanılmıştır. En fazla kullanılan anahtar kelime, alana ismini veren “iş güvenliği” kelimesidir. Bu alana toplam 24.410 yazarın katkı sağladığı ve makalelere 1.909 derginin kaynaklık yaptığı görülmüştür. En fazla yayın yapan ülkenin “ABD”, en fazla katkı yapan yazarın “Arcury”, en fazla makale yayınlanan derginin “Safety Science” ve en etkin kurumun “Center for Disease Control Prevantion” olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu çalışma ile iş güvenliği alanında yapılan çalışmaların ağ haritaları, anahtar kelimeler, yayınlar ve ilişkili konular güncel literatürle incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özdemir, H., Kayabaşı, R. (2024). A Bibliometric Research in Web of Science Database: Articles on Occupational Safety. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 290–306. https://doi.org/10.56554/jtom.1244801

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (56)

  1. Al, U. ve Tonta, Y. (2004). Atıf analizi: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphanecilik Bölümü tezlerinde atıf yapılan kaynaklar.Bilgi Dünyası, 5(1), 19-47.doi: https://doi.org/10.15612/BD.2004.497
  2. Ali, F., Park, E. & Chae, B. (2019). 30 years of contemporary hospitality management: Uncovering the bibliometrics and topical trends. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(7), 2641- 2665. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2018-0832
  3. Archambault, É., Campbell, D., Gingras, Y. & Larivière, V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7),1320-1326. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21062
  4. Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis.Journal of Informetrics. 11(4), 959-975. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  5. Banks, C. (2019). Health, safety, well-being and economic security implications of gig work: An interdisciplinary perspective. 11 Mayıs 2023. https://www.ilo.org/safework/events/safeday/33thinkpieces/WCMS_674004/langzn/index.htm%20adresinden%2 0al%C4%B1nd%C4%B1
  6. Barling, J., Loughlin, C.& Kelloway, E. K. (2002). Development and test of a model linking safety-specific transformational leadership and occupational safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 488-496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.488
  7. Birch, M. E. & Cary, R. A. (1996). Elemental carbon-based method for monitoring occupational exposures to particulate diesel exhaust. Aerosol Science And Technology, 25(3), 221-241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829608965393
  8. Boustras, G.& Waring, A. (2020). Towards a reconceptualization of safety and security, their interactions, and policy requirements in a 21st century context. Safety Science, 132(104942), 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104942
  9. Carayon, P., Hancock, P., Leveson, N., Noy, I., Sznelwar, L.& Hootegem, G. (2015). Advancing a sociotechnical systems approach to workplace safety – developing the conceptual framework.Ergonomics.58(4), 548-564. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2015.1015623
  10. Chen, H., Hou, C., Zhang, L. & Li, S. (2020). Comparative study on the strands of research on the governance model of international occupational safety and healthissues. Safety Science,122, 1-14.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104513
  11. Choudhry, R. M.& Dongping, F. (2008). Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites. Safety Science,46(4), 566-584. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.027
  12. Christian, M. S., Bradley, J. C., Wallace, C. J. & Burke, M. j. (2009). Workplace safety: A meta analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1103-1127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016172 ClarivateWeb of Science Core Collection (2022). Erişim adresi: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science-core-collection/(Erişim tarihi: 01.10.2022)
  13. Çoşkun, H. E. ve Tabak, A. (2017). Örgütsel davranış çalıştığımızda aslında ne çalışıyoruz? Türkiye’de yapılan lisansüstü tezler üzerinden bir değerlendirme. İş ve İnsan Dergisi,4(2). 101-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.18394/iid.297985
  14. Das, A., & Saha, T. (2014). Authorship trends and collaborative research in the library and information science: a bibliometric study of" Desidoc Journal of Library & Information Technology" during 2005-2014. South Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (SAJMS), 2(2). 1-10. Retrieved from: http://sajms.iurc.edu.pk/index.php
  15. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N.& Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  16. Ellegaard, O. (2018). The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics, 116, 181-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2765-z
  17. Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A. & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The Faseb Journal, 22(2), 338-342. doi: https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
  18. International Labour Organization (ILO) OSH Management Sysytem: A tool for continual. (2011). Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/events-training/events-meetings/world-daysafety-health-at-work/lang--en/index.htm
  19. ILO (2019), Çalışma yaşamının geleceğinin merkezinde sağlık ve güvenlik: 100 Yıllık deneyimden hareketle. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---europe/---ro-geneva/---iloankara/ documents/publication/wcms_693766.pdf
  20. Karasözen, B., Bayram, Ö. G. ve Zan, B. U. (2009). 1997-2006 Türkiye Bilim Göstergeleri Analizi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 23(1), 4-21. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tk/issue/48855/622444
  21. Kılkış, İ. (2018). İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği. Dora Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
  22. Kim, J., Kang, S. & Lee, K. H. (2021). Evolution of digital marketing communication: Bibliometric analysis and network visualization from key articles. Journal of Business Research, 130, 552-563. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.043
  23. Kiran, S. (2021). Occupational health could be the new normal challenge in the trade and health cycle: Keywords analysis between 1990 and 2020. Safety and Health at Work, 12(2), 272-276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2020.11.003
  24. Kyle, S. & Larivière, V. (2022). Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation. Research Policy, 51(10), 1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104608
  25. Li, J. & Hale, A. (2015). Identification of, and knowledge communication among core safety science journals. Safety Science, 74, 70-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.12.003.
  26. Li, J. & Hale, A. (2016). Output distributions and topic maps of safety related journals. Safety Science, 82, 236- 244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.09.004
  27. Ma, J. (2022). Lightweight deep learning models for resource constrained devices. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience,, 2022, 1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4293102
  28. Maseda, A., Iturralde, T., Cooper, S. & Aparicio, G. (2022). Mapping women's involvement in family firms: A review based on bibliographic coupling analysis. 24(2), 279-305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12278
  29. Massimo, A. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  30. Merig, J. & Yang, J.-B. (2017). Accounting research: A Bibliometric analysis. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 71-100.doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12109.
  31. Merigó, J. M., Miranda, J., Modak, N. M., Boustras, G. & de la Sotta, C. (2019). Forty years of Safety Science: A bibliometric overview. Safety Science, 115, 66-88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.01.029.
  32. Mohamed, S. (2002). Safety Climate in construction site environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(5), 375-384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:5(375)
  33. Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P. & Hofmann, D. A. (2011). Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 71-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021484
  34. Naveen, D., Satish, K., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  35. Neal, A.& Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4),946-953. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
  36. Newaz, M. T., Ershadi, M., Jefferies, M., Pillay, M.& Davis, P. (2022). A systematic review of contemporary safety management research: a multi-level approach to identifying trending domains in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 41(2), 97-115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2124527
  37. Palaz, S. (2019). Sosyal Bilimlerde İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Uygulamaları. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık Eğitim ve Danışmanlık.
  38. Pesta, B., Fuerst, J.& Kirkegaard, E. O. (2018). Bibliometric keyword analysis across seventeen years (2000– 2016) of intelligence articles. Journal of Intelligence, 6(4), 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6040046
  39. Subramony, M., Golubovskaya, M., Keating, B., Solnet, D., Field, J. & Witheriff, M. (2022). The influence of pandemic-related workplace safety practices on frontline service employee wellbeing outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 149, 363-374. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.040
  40. Sümer, H. H. (2018). İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Hukuku. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  41. Tamdoğan, O. G. (2009). Bilgi üretiminde yazın ürünleri ve kütüphaneler: Atıfların tespiti ve analizi yoluyla araştırma. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 23(2), 254-277. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tk/issue/48929/624162
  42. Tonta, Y. (2017). Türkiye’de yayımlanan ve Web of Science’ta dizinlenen dergilerle ilgili bir değerlendirme. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 31(4), 449-482. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tk/issue/48646/618435 TÜBİTAK Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi (2023). Erişim adresi:https://cabim.ulakbim.gov.tr/bibliyometrikanaliz/ bibliyometrik-analiz-sikca-sorulan-sorular/ Van Nunen, K., Li, J., Reniers, G. & Ponnet, K. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Safety Science, 108, 248-258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.011
  43. Vijayakumarve, R.& Choi, J. H. (2022). Emerging trends of ergonomic risk assessment in construction safety management: A scientometric visualization analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 1-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316120
  44. VOSviewer. VOSviewer: Visiualizing Scientific Landscape (2022)Retrieved from: https://www.vosviewer.com/features/highlights
  45. Wani, S. A., Akhter, M. & Musthtaq, R. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of google scholar indexed top journals in socialsciences. Journal Of Indian Library Association, 57(3), 41-52. Retrieved from: https://ilaindia.net/jila/index.php/jila/article/view/674
  46. Yalçın, S., Yavuz, H. Ç. ve Dibek, M. İ. (2015). En yüksek etki faktörüne sahip eğitim dergilerindeki makalelerin içerik analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(182), 1-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4868
  47. Yıldız, A. N., & Şahan, C. (2020). İş sağlığı ve güvenliği temel kavramlar. İçinde A. N. Yıldız, & A. Sandal, İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Meslek Hastalıkları (s. 27). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  48. Zeng, L. & Li, R. M. (2022). Construction safety and health hazard awareness in Web of Science and Weibo between 1991 and 2021. Safety Science, 152, 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105790
  49. Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organization: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96-102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96
  50. Kılkış, İ. (2018). İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği. Dora Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
  51. Kyle, S. & Larivière, V. (2022). Who games metrics and rankings? Institutional niches and journal impact factor inflation. Research Policy, 51(10), 1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104608
  52. Ma, J. (2022). Lightweight deep learning models for resource constrained devices. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience,, 2022, 1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4293102
  53. Mohamed, S. (2002). Safety Climate in construction site environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(5), 375-384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:5(375)
  54. Naveen, D., Satish, K., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  55. Pesta, B., Fuerst, J.& Kirkegaard, E. O. (2018). Bibliometric keyword analysis across seventeen years (2000– 2016) of intelligence articles. Journal of Intelligence, 6(4), 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6040046
  56. Yıldız, A. N., & Şahan, C. (2020). İş sağlığı ve güvenliği temel kavramlar. İçinde A. N. Yıldız, & A. Sandal, İş Sağlığı ve Güvenliği Meslek Hastalıkları (s. 27). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları.