SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Turkish Operations Management / 2025 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Technostress and Related Managerial Variables: A Global Perspective

Teknostres ve İlgili Yönetimsel Değişkenler: Küresel Bir Perspektif

İbrahim Durmuş(BAYBURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3872-2258
Pages
265–282
Publication Date
2025-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When considering the relationships between these concepts, it was found that technostress, covid-19, burnout, productivity, stress, work-family conflict, job satisfaction, work engagement, technology, coping, higher education, digital transformation, work-life balance, techno-stressors, digital stress, anxiety, health, academic performance, online learning, technostress creators, ICT, job burnout, digital, innovation, information technology, covid-19 pandemic, remote work, and self-efficacy form strong connections together.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Technological innovations have influenced organizations' business activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Some of the key concepts that were often highlighted by the authors include technostress, covid-19, performance, social media, stress, information overload, overload, job satisfaction, technology, burnout, digital transformation, technostress creators, productivity, work-family conflict, digitalization, strain, coping, job, job performance, techno-overload, digital, emotional exhaustion, satisfaction, self-efficacy, work-life balance, anxiety, exhaustion, well-being, and work engagement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When considering the relationships between these concepts, it was found that technostress, covid-19, burnout, productivity, stress, work-family conflict, job satisfaction, work engagement, technology, coping, higher education, digital transformation, work-life balance, techno-stressors, digital stress, anxiety, health, academic performance, online learning, technostress creators, ICT, job burnout, digital, innovation, information technology, covid-19 pandemic, remote work, and self-efficacy form strong connections together.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bibliyometrik Analiz · Organizasyonlar · Teknoloji

Abstract

Technological innovations have influenced organizations' business activities. In the study of technostress in management, the aim was to evaluate the perception of technostress created by technological changes and developments among employees. To achieve this goal, studies published in the WoS literature were examined. The research utilized a bibliometric analysis method. The analysis focused on the key terms and conceptual relationships that the authors frequently emphasized in their studies. Some of the key concepts that were often highlighted by the authors include technostress, covid-19, performance, social media, stress, information overload, overload, job satisfaction, technology, burnout, digital transformation, technostress creators, productivity, work-family conflict, digitalization, strain, coping, job, job performance, techno-overload, digital, emotional exhaustion, satisfaction, self-efficacy, work-life balance, anxiety, exhaustion, well-being, and work engagement. When considering the relationships between these concepts, it was found that technostress, covid-19, burnout, productivity, stress, work-family conflict, job satisfaction, work engagement, technology, coping, higher education, digital transformation, work-life balance, techno-stressors, digital stress, anxiety, health, academic performance, online learning, technostress creators, ICT, job burnout, digital, innovation, information technology, covid-19 pandemic, remote work, and self-efficacy form strong connections together. Regarding centrality and density, technostress creators, job burnout, personality, technostress inhibitors, organizational commitment, personality traits, compliance intention, compulsive usage, eustress, and job engagement were found to have strong relationships. Implementing technological and digital transformations after employees have experienced them may lead to healthier outcomes. Particularly for individuals who enjoy technology and can apply technological innovations in their lives, stress factors may be at lower levels.

Özet

Teknolojik yenilikler organizasyonların iş faaliyetlerini etkilemiştir. Yönetimde teknostres araştırmasında, teknolojik değişimlerin ve gelişimlerin genel olarak çalışanlarda oluşturduğu teknostres algısının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Amaç çerçevesinde WoS literatüründe yer alan araştırmalar incelenmiştir. Araştırmada bibliyometrik analiz yönteminden faydalanılmıştır. Araştırmalarda özellikle yazarların vurgu yaptığı anahtar kelimeler ve kavramsal ilişkiler üzerinden çıkarımlarda bulunulmuştur. Yazarların sıklıkla vurguladığı kavramların bazıları, teknostres, covid-19, performans, sosyal medya, stres, aşırı bilgi yüklemesi, aşırı yükleme, iş tatmini, teknoloji, tükenmişlik, dijital dönüşüm, teknostres yaratıcıları, üretkenlik, iş-aile çatışması, dijitalleşme, gerginlik, başa çıkma , iş, iş performansı, aşırı teknoloji yükü, nbsp, dijital, duygusal tükenme, memnuniyet, öz yeterlilik, iş-yaşam dengesi, kaygı, tükenme, iyilik hali, işe bağlılık şeklinde sıralanmıştır. Yazarların vurguladığı kavramların birbirleri ile ilişkileri dikkate alındığında, teknostres, covid-19, tükenmişlik, üretkenlik, stres, iş-aile çatışması, iş tatmini, işe bağlılık, teknoloji, başa çıkma, yüksek öğrenim, dijital dönüşüm, iş-yaşam dengesi, tekno-stres etkenleri , dijital stres, kaygı, sağlık, akademik performans, çevrimiçi öğrenme, teknostres yaratıcıları, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri, iş tükenmişliği, dijital, inovasyon, bilgi teknolojisi, covid-19 salgını, uzaktan çalışma, öz yeterlilik kavramlarının birlikte güçlü ilişkiler ortaya koyduğu görülmüştür. Merkezilik ve yoğunluk açısından, teknostres yaratıcıları, iş tükenmişliği, kişilik, teknostres önleyiciler, örgütsel bağlılık, kişilik özellikleri, uyum niyeti, kompulsif kullanım, östres, işe bağlılık, güçlü ilişkilere sahip olmuştur. Teknolojik ve dijital dönüşümlerin, çalışanlar terafından tecrübe edildikten sonra uygulamaya geçirilmesi, daha sağlıklı sonuçlar oluşturur. Özellikle teknolojiyi seven ve teknolojik yenilikleri hayatına uygulayabilen bireylerde stres unsuru daha alt seviyelerde yer alır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Durmuş, İ. (2025). Technostress and Related Managerial Variables: A Global Perspective. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 265–282. https://doi.org/10.56554/jtom.1641350

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  2. Atanasoff, L., & Venable, M.A. (2017). Technostress: Implications for adults in the workforce. The Career Development Quarterly, 65, 326-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12111
  3. Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., & Purvis, R. (2011). Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 831-858. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41409963
  4. Bencsik, A., & Csinger, B. (2021). Innovations in human resources management of higher education institutions: Technostress factors. In: Marketing i menedžment innovacij, (4), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2021.4-05
  5. Bencsik, A., & Juhász, T. (2023). The impact of technostress on organizational functioning. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(1), 230-241. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(1).2023.20
  6. Berger, M., Schäfer, R., Schmidt, M., Regal, C., & Gimpel, H. (2024). How to prevent technostress at the digital workplace: a Delphi study. Journal of Business Economics, 94, 1051–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-023-01159-3
  7. Bhatt, N., & Kothari, T.P. (2022). Determinants of technostress: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Business Science and Technology, 8(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.11118/ejobsat.2022.007 Bibliometrix website (2024). (https://www.bibliometrix.org/home/)
  8. Bondanini, G., Giorgi, G., Ariza-Montes, A., Vega-Muñoz, A., & Andreucci-Annunziata, P. (2020). Technostress dark side of technology in the workplace: A scientometric analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218013
  9. Cao, X., & Yu, L. (2019). Exploring the influence of excessive social media use at work: A threedimension usage perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.019
  10. Caro, D.H.J., A., M.B., A., M.H., & Sethi, A.S. (1985). Strategic management of technostress. The chaining of Prometheus. Journal of Medical Systems, 9(5/6), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992568 Cobo, M.J., Martinez, M.A., Gutierrez-Salcedo, M., Fujita, H., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). 25 years at Knowledge-Based Systems: A bibliometric analysis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 80, 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2014.12.035
  11. Çini, M.A., Erdirençelebi M., & Akman A.Z. (2023). The effect of organization employees' perspective on digital transformation on their technostress levels and performance: A public institution example. Central European Business Review, 12(4), 33-57. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.331
  12. Dragano, N., & Lunau, T. (2020). Technostress at work and mental health: concepts and research results. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 33(4), 407-413. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000613
  13. Duggal, H.K., Khatri, P., Thomas, A., & Pironti, M. (2024). Changing learning paradigms: an interplay of Digital Taylorism and technostress on perceived employability. Journal of Management History, 30(2), 166-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-12-2022-0089
  14. Ewers, M., & Kangmennaang, J. (2023). New spaces of inequality with the rise of remote work: Autonomy, technostress, and life disruption. Applied Geography, 152, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102888
  15. Florkowski, G.W. (2019). HR technologies and HR-staff technostress: an unavoidable or combatable effect? Employee Relations: The International Journal, 41(5), 1120-1144. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-08-2018-0214
  16. Ioannou, A., Lycett, M., & Marshan, A. (2024). The role of mindfulness in mitigating the negative consequences of technostress. Information Systems Frontiers, 26, 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10239-0
  17. Irfan, M., Sulehri, N.A., & Manickiam, N. (2024). Digital threads in turbulent times: unraveling technostress and cleaner production in the food industry. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2023.1293904
  18. Jaiswal, A., Sengupta, S., Panda, M., Hati, L., Prikshat, V., Patel, P., & Mohyuddin, S. (2024). Teleworking: Role of psychological well-being and technostress in the relationship between trust in management and employee performance. International Journal of Manpower, 45(1), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2022-0149
  19. Khedhaouria, A., Montani, F., Jamal, A., & Shah, M.H. (2024). Consequences of technostress for users in remote (home) work contexts during a time of crisis: The buffering role of emotional social support. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 199, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123065
  20. Kırıcı, S., & Yılmaz, I. (2025). Application of the nasa-tlx method for workload assessment of information technology employees in the remote working process: a case of defense industry. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, 9(1), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.56554/jtom.1470739
  21. Kim, D.G., & Lee, C.W. (2021). Exploring the roles of self-efficacy and technical support in the relationship between techno-stress and counter-productivity. Sustainability, 13, 1-16. 4349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084349
  22. Kumar, P.S. (2024). Technostress: A comprehensive literature review on dimensions, impacts, and management strategies. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 16, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100475
  23. Leitner, I., & Liepert, M. (2024). Demographic and occupational determinants of technical overload, techno-intrusion and techno-complexity. Scientific Studios on Social and Political Psychology, 30(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.61727/sssppj/1.2024.46
  24. Leitner, I., & Rašticová, M. (2023). Technostress and its management in the 21st century workplace: Implications for consulting workforce. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 27(2), 206-222.
  25. Lim, J., & Hwang, J. (2024). Exploring knowledge management technologies to enhance sustainability and mitigate technostress from a collaborative perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2023-1304
  26. Mahboob, A., & Khan, T. (2016). Technostress and its management techniques: A literature review. Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(3), 28-31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20160403.12
  27. Maier, C., Laumer, S., Wirth, J., & Weitzel, T. (2019). Technostress and the hierarchical levels of personality: a two-wave study with multiple data samples. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(5), 496-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2019.1614739
  28. Martínez-Navalon, J.G., Gelashvili, V., Dematos, N., & Herrera-Enríquez, G. (2023). Exploring the impact of digital knowledge management on technostress and sustainability. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(8), 2194-2216. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2022-0544
  29. Okolo, D., Kamarudin, S., & Ahmad, U.N.U. (2019). Employing the sociotechnical system theory of job design for technostress intervention: An integration of technological and social job characteristics. Change Management: An International Journal, 19(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-798X/CGP/v19i01/11-23 Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps. Encyclopedia, 4, 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065
  30. Pirkkalainen, H., Tarafdar, M., Salo, M., & Makkonen, M. (2022). Proximal and distal antecedents of problematic information technology use in organizations. Internet Research, 32(7), 139-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-02-2021-0083
  31. Riedl, R. (2013). On the biology of technostress: Literature review and research Agenda. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 44(1), 18-55.
  32. Riedl, R., Fischer, T., & Reuter, M. (2023). Measuring digital stress in the workplace context: Short version of the Digital Stressors Scale (DSS). Informatik Spektrum, 46, 235–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00287-023-01553-9
  33. Rodriguez, B.P., Verdu-Jover, A.J., Estrada-Cruz, M., & Gomez-Gras, J.M. (2024). Does digital transformation increase firms’ productivity perception? The role of technostress and work engagement. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 33(2), 137-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-06-2022-0177
  34. Sanjaya, N., Do, B-R, Salim, U., & Moko, W. (2018). Influence socially responsible human resource management, technostress creators and employee satisfaction to use fintech (study on Financial Institutions in Indonesia). Asia-Pacific Management and Business Application, 7(2) 81-94. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2018.007.022
  35. Salazar-Concha, C., Ficapal-Cusí, P., Boada-Grau, J., & Camacho, L.J. (2021). Analyzing the evolution of technostress: A science mapping approach. Heliyon, 7, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06726
  36. Salo, M., Pirkkalainen, H., Makkonen, M., & Hekkala, R. (2018). Distress, eustress, or no stress? Explaining smartphone users' different technostress responses. In ICIS 2018: Proceedings the 39th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1-17). Association for Information Systems (AIS). https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2018/behavior/Presentations/13/
  37. Sharma, I., Tiwari, V., Gupta, S., & Rana, N.P. (2024). Examining the nexus between technostress and turnover intention: the moderating influence of PsyCap in Indian information management contexts. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2023-0434
  38. Soukupová, N., Kocourková, M., & Drahotová, K. (2024). Current approaches of stress management in the Czech business environment. Central European Business Review, 13(5), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.373
  39. Suharti, L., & Susanto, A. (2014). The impact of workload and technology competence on technostress and performance of employees. Indian Journal of Commerce & Management Studies, 5(2), 1-7.
  40. Taneja, A., & Singh, E. (2018). Impact of technostress on organisational commitment in information technology sector. Anusandhan the Research Repository of GIBS, 1(1), 75-79.
  41. Tarafdar, M., Salo, M., Pirkkalainen, H., & Makkonen, M. (2020). Taking on the “Dark Side”–coping with technostress. Information and Knowledge Management, 22(6), 82-89. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2020.2977343
  42. Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B.S., & Ragu-Nathan, T.S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301-328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
  43. Wang, X., & Li, B. (2019). Technostress among university teachers in higher education: A study using multidimensional person-environment misfit theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01791
  44. Wang, K., Shu, Q., & Tu, Q. (2008). Technostress under different organizational environments: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 3002-3013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.05.007
  45. Zeeshan, M., Chaudhry, A.G., & Khan, S.E. (2020). Pandemic preparedness and techno stress among Faculty of DAIs in covid-19. Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research, 3(2), 383-396. https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol3-iss2-2020(383-396)