Journals / Anatomy / 2015 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

A descriptive and morphometric study of the fabellofibular, arcuate popliteal and popliteofibular ligaments

Journal
Anatomy
Pages
51–59
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Findings indicate the structural relationship between ALs and FF, variability in the morphology of the ligaments and a positive relationship between fabella thickness and FF morphology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The anatomical relationship of the fibrous structures in the posterolateral corner of the knee is highly complex, with many different descriptions of these structures in the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aimed to examine these structures and describe their features to clarify our understanding of their morphology.Methods: The posterolateral corner of the knee joint was bilaterally dissected in 10 male cadavers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Findings indicate the structural relationship between ALs and FF, variability in the morphology of the ligaments and a positive relationship between fabella thickness and FF morphology.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:arcuate popliteal ligament · fabellofibular ligament · popliteofibular ligament

Abstract

Objectives: The anatomical relationship of the fibrous structures in the posterolateral corner of the knee is highly complex, with many different descriptions of these structures in the literature. Discrepancy in the definitions of FF, AL and PF are a problem for both clinicians and anatomists. This study aimed to examine these structures and describe their features to clarify our understanding of their morphology.Methods: The posterolateral corner of the knee joint was bilaterally dissected in 10 male cadavers. Fibrous structures originating from the fibular head as a common mass were defined in relation to their attachment sites and positions according to the inferior lateral genicular vessels. The fabellofibular ligament (FF) was grouped into two categories, depending on the presence of a dense, fibrous tissue band. The arcuate popliteal ligament components were grouped into superficial (ALs) and deep (ALd) by their position relative to the inferior lateral genicular vessels. The popliteofibular ligament (PF) was identified as the fibrous bundle attached to the inferior border of popliteus tendon (PT). Dimensions of these structures were measured, and statistical analyses undertaken using paired and independent t-tests (p<0.05 significant).Results: FF had a dense fibrous band in 11 out of 20 knees. The fabella thickness was significantly higher in cases which FF had a dense fibrous band (p=0.04). ALs and PF were present in all knees. Absence of ALd was observed in 5 out of 20 knees. Conclusion: Findings indicate the structural relationship between ALs and FF, variability in the morphology of the ligaments and a positive relationship between fabella thickness and FF morphology. Some structures were consistently present (AL, PF), while ALd was only present intermittently. We suggest descriptions of the posterolateral ligaments of knee that utilize attachment sites, relationships with the inferior lateral genicular vessels, and developmental relationships to the popliteus muscle to clarify terminology for these structures.

🔖

Cite This Article

OLGUNUS, Z. K., ELVAN, Ö., AKTEKİN, M., ÇOLAK, M. (2015). A descriptive and morphometric study of the fabellofibular, arcuate popliteal and popliteofibular ligaments. Anatomy, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 51–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/151513

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Covey DC. Injuries of the posterolateral corner of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83-A:106–18. Espregueira-Mendes JD, da Silva MV. Anatomy of the lateral collateral ligament:a cadaver and histological study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006;14:221–8.
  2. Brinkman JM, Schwering PJA, Blankevoort L, Koolos JG, Luites J, Wymenga AB. The insertion geometry of the posterolateral corner of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87-B:1364–8.
  3. Camarda L, Condello V, Madonna V, Cortese F. Results of isolated posterolateral corner reconstruction. J Orthopaed Traumatol;11:73–79.
  4. Jung GH, Kim JD, Kim H. Location and classification of popliteus tendon’s origin:cadaveric study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg;130:1027–32.
  5. Kim JG, Lee YS, Ha JK, Jun SS, Jin YC. Influence of knee flexion and femoral cross-pin insertion angle on posterolateral structures of the knee and lateral fixation lengths during ACL reconstruction. Surg Radiol Anat 2012;34:421–5.
  6. Wadia FD, Pimple M, Gajjar SM, Narvekar AD. An anatomic study of the popliteofibular ligament. International Orthopaedics;27:172–4.
  7. Minowa T, Murakami G, Suzuki D, Uchiyama E, Kura H, Yamashita T. Topographical histology of the posterolateral corner of the knee, with special reference to laminar configurations around the popliteus tendon: a study of elderly Japanese and latestage fetuses. J Orthop Sci 2005;10:48–55.
  8. Zeng SX, Dong XL, Dang RS, Wu GS, Wang JF, Wang D, Huang HL, Guo XD. Anatomic study of fabella and its surrounding structures in a Chinese population. Surg Radiol Anat;34:65–71.
  9. Ishigooka H, Sugihara T, Shimizu K, Aoki H, Hirata K. Anatomical study of the popliteofibular ligament and surrounding structures. J Orthop Sci 2004;9:51–8.
  10. LaPrade RF, Ly TV, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L. The posterolateral attachments of the knee: a qualitative and quantitative morphologic analysis of the fibular collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, popliteofibular ligament, and lateral gastrocnemius tendon. Am J Sports Med 2003;3:854–60.
  11. Seebacher JR, Inglis AE, Marshall JL, Warren RF. The structure of the posterolateral aspect of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am;64:536–41. Standring S, editor. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 39th ed. Edinburgh (Scotland): Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. p. 1478–80. Standring S, editor. Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 40th ed. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; p. 1400–8.
  12. Williams PL, Bannister LH, Collins P, Dyson M, Ferguson MWJ, editors.