Journals / Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry / 2026 / Volume: 2026 Issue: 2

Artificial Intelligence in Analytical Chemistry: A Critical Review of Applications, Model Performance, Validation, and Emerging Challenges

Celin Jannat Doust(ANKARA MEDİPOL UNIVERSITY)0009-0004-4104-5018
Ece Ozkan(ANKARA MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7529-5569
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Correcting these limitations is essential to implement high-performance AI models in a more realistic, transparent, and transferable analytical tool for modern analytical chemistry, and this is of great importance for their translation and successful application in the field of analytical chemistry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming analytical chemistry by making it even more efficient to process and interpret complex high-dimensional analytical data.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To date, no single approach is more efficient, and hence, the selection of a model is based on the characteristics of analytical data used, application of the data, and validation strategy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Correcting these limitations is essential to implement high-performance AI models in a more realistic, transparent, and transferable analytical tool for modern analytical chemistry, and this is of great importance for their translation and successful application in the field of analytical chemistry.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Artificial Intelligence · Analytical Chemistry · Explainable AI

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming analytical chemistry by making it even more efficient to process and interpret complex high-dimensional analytical data. Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches have huge potential in spectroscopy, chromatography, mass spectrometry, and other analytical applications and thus enhance classification, prediction, method optimization, and data interpretation. In this review we examine the current state of AI applications in analytical chemistry, especially for the commonly employed approaches (PLS, SVM, ANN, random forests, and CNN) and their features and limitations. In addition to predictive accuracy, the main challenges to reliable implementation are overfitting and dataset size and quality, preprocessing dependence, model complexity and interpretability, external validation, and transferability between different instruments and laboratories. To date, no single approach is more efficient, and hence, the selection of a model is based on the characteristics of analytical data used, application of the data, and validation strategy. The major knowledge gaps in this regard are: a lack of standardized datasets, limited and non-standardized external and inter-laboratory validation of models, and a lack of chemically meaningful model interpretation. Correcting these limitations is essential to implement high-performance AI models in a more realistic, transparent, and transferable analytical tool for modern analytical chemistry, and this is of great importance for their translation and successful application in the field of analytical chemistry.

🔖

Cite This Article

Doust, C. J., Ozkan, E. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Analytical Chemistry: A Critical Review of Applications, Model Performance, Validation, and Emerging Challenges. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, Volume: 2026 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.18596/jotcsa.1951243

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (140)

  1. Sharifani K, Amini M. Machine learning and deep learning: A review of methods and applications. World Inf Technol Eng J. 2023;10(7):3897–904. Available from:.
  2. Kaur C, Chandel R, Pal Singh Brar T, Sharma S. Machine learning and its applications-A review study. CGC Int J Contemp Technol Res. 5(2):365–9. Available from:.
  3. Vargas R, Mosavi A, Ruiz R. Deep learning: A review. 2018. Available from:.
  4. Hippe Z. Problems in the application of artificial intelligence in analytical chemistry. Anal Chim Acta. 1983;150:11–21. Available from:.
  5. Cardoso Rial R. AI in analytical chemistry: Advancements, challenges, and future directions. Talanta. 2024 Jul;274:125949. Available from:.
  6. Baum ZJ, Yu X, Ayala PY, Zhao Y, Watkins SP, Zhou Q. Artificial intelligence in chemistry: Current trends and future directions. J Chem Inf Model. 2021 Jul 26;61(7):3197–212. Available from:.
  7. Workman J, Mark H. Artificial intelligence in analytical spectroscopy, part II: Examples in spectroscopy. Spectroscopy. 2023 Jun 1;38(6):10–5. Available from:.
  8. Şeker A, Diri B, Balik HH. Derin öğrenme yöntemleri ve uygulamaları hakkında bir inceleme. Gazi Mühendislik Bilim Derg. 2017;3(3):47–64. Available from:.
  9. Khopkar SM. Basic concepts of analytical chemistry. Second Edition. New Age International; 2004.
  10. Prasad RD, Sarvalkar PD, Prasad N, Prasad SR, Prasad RS, Prasad RB, et al. A review on spectroscopic techniques for analysis of nanomaterials and biomaterials. ES Energy Environ. 2025;27:1264. Available from:.
  11. Workman J. A review of the latest spectroscopic research in pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical applications. Spectroscopy. 2024 Aug 1;39(6):25–9. Available from:.
  12. Gautam R, Vanga S, Ariese F, Umapathy S. Review of multidimensional data processing approaches for raman and infrared spectroscopy. EPJ Tech Instrum. 2015 Dec 2;2(1):8. Available from:.
  13. Kim Y, Oh D, Huh S, Song D, Jeong S, Kwon J, et al. Deep learning-based statistical noise reduction for multidimensional spectral data. Rev Sci Instrum. 2021 Jul 1;92(7). Available from:.
  14. Houhou R, Bocklitz T. Trends in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and chemometrics applied to chemical data. Anal Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 2;2(3–4):128–41. Available from:.
  15. Sunil M, Pallikkavaliyaveetil N, N Mi, Gopinath A, Chidangil S, Kumar S, et al. Machine learning assisted raman spectroscopy: A viable approach for the detection of microplastics. J Water Process Eng. 2024 Apr;60:105150. Available from:.
  16. Ziani I, Bouakline H, El Guerraf A, El Bachiri A, Marie-Laure Fauconnier, Sher F. Integrating AI and advanced spectroscopic techniques for precision food safety and quality control. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2025 Feb;156:104850. Available from:.
  17. Qi Y, Liu Y, Luo J. Recent application of faman spectroscopy in tumor diagnosis: From conventional methods to artificial intelligence fusion. PhotoniX. 2023 Jul 7;4(1):22. Available from:.
  18. Angulo A, Yang L, Aydil ES, Modestino MA. Machine learning enhanced spectroscopic analysis: Towards autonomous chemical mixture characterization for rapid process optimization. Digit Discov. 2022;1(1):35–44. Available from:.
  19. Pan L, Zhang P, Daengngam C, Peng S, Chongcheawchamnan M. A review of artificial intelligence methods combined with raman spectroscopy to identify the composition of substances. J Raman Spectrosc. 2022 Jan 15;53(1):6–19. Available from:.
  20. Ye Z. Artificial-Intelligence approach for biomedical sample characterization using raman spectroscopy. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2005 Jan;2(1):67–73. Available from:.
  21. Mozaffari MH, Tay LL. Raman spectral analysis of mixtures with one-dimensional convolutional neural network. 2021 Jun 1; Available from:.
  22. Chen X, Wu X, Chen C, Luo C, Shi Y, Li Z, et al. Raman spectroscopy combined with a support vector machine algorithm as a diagnostic technique for primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 29;13(1):5137. Available from:.
  23. Barredo Arrieta A, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Del Ser J, Bennetot A, Tabik S, Barbado A, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Inf Fusion. 2020 Jun;58:82–115. Available from:.
  24. Bjerring JC, Mainz J, Munch L. Deep learning models and the limits of explainable artificial intelligence. Asian J Philos. 2025 Jan 30;4(1):22. Available from:.
  25. Samek W, Wiegand T, Müller KR. Explainable artificial intelligence: Understanding, visualizing and interpreting deep learning models. 2017 Aug 28; Available from:.
  26. Contreras J, Winterfeld A, Popp J, Bocklitz T. Spectral Zones-Based SHAP/LIME: Enhancing interpretability in spectral deep learning models through grouped feature analysis. Anal Chem. 2024 Oct 1;96(39):15588–97. Available from:.
  27. Contreras J, Bocklitz T. Explainable artificial intelligence for spectroscopy data: A review. Pflügers Arch - Eur J Physiol. 2025 Apr 1;477(4):603–15. Available from:.
  28. Oviedo F, Ferres JL, Buonassisi T, Butler KT. Interpretable and explainable machine learning for materials science and chemistry. Accounts Mater Res. 2022 Jun 24;3(6):597–607. Available from:.
  29. Mohammed S, Budach L, Feuerpfeil M, Ihde N, Nathansen A, Noack N, et al. The effects of data quality on machine learning performance on tabular data. Inf Syst. 2025 Jul 1;132:102549. Available from:.
  30. Rahal M, Ahmed BS, Szabados G, Fornstedt T, Samuelsson J. Enhancing machine learning performance through intelligent data quality assessment: An unsupervised data-centric framework. Heliyon. 2025 Feb;11(4):e42777. Available from:.
  31. Davariashtiyani A, Wang B, Hajinazar S, Zurek E, Kadkhodaei S. Impact of data bias on machine learning for crystal compound synthesizability predictions. Mach Learn Sci Technol. 2024 Dec 1;5(4):040501. Available from:.
  32. Bertossi L, Geerts F. Data quality and explainable AI. J Data Inf Qual. 2020 Jun 30;12(2):1–9. Available from:.
  33. Balabin RM, Lomakina EI. Support vector machine regression (SVR/LS-SVM)—an alternative to neural networks (ANN) for analytical chemistry? Comparison of nonlinear methods on near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data. Analyst. 2011;136(8):1703–12. Available from:.
  34. Agatonovic-Kustrin S, Zecevic M, Zivanovic L. Use of ANN modelling in structure–retention relationships of diuretics in RP-HPLC. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1999 Oct;21(1):95–103. Available from:.
  35. Vasiljević T, Onjia A, Čokeša Đ, Laušević M. Optimization of artificial neural network for retention modeling in high-performance liquid chromatography. Talanta. 2004 Oct;64(3):785–90. Available from:.
  36. Afradi A, Ebrahimabadi A. Comparison of artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and gene expression programming (GEP) approaches for predicting TBM penetration rate. SN Appl Sci. 2020 Dec 17;2(12):2004. Available from:.
  37. Murphy S. The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing analytical chemistry techniques to streamline drug development and testing processes. J Anal Bioanal Tech. 2025 Apr 30;16(4):1–2. Available from:.
  38. Galán-Freyle NJ, Ospina-Castro ML, Medina-González AR, Villarreal-González R, Hernández-Rivera SP, Pacheco-Londoño LC. Artificial intelligence assisted mid-infrared laser spectroscopy in situ detection of petroleum in soils. Appl Sci. 2020 Feb 15;10(4):1319. Available from:.
  39. Ain QU, Nazir R, Nawaz A, Shahbaz H, Dilshad A, Mufti IU, et al. Machine learning approach towards quality assurance, challenges and possible strategies in laboratory medicine. J Clin Transl Pathol. 2024 Jun 25;4(2):76–87. Available from:.
  40. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C, Favaloro E. Artificial intelligence in the pre-analytical phase: State-of-the art and future perspectives. J Med Biochem. 2024;43(1):1–10. Available from:.
  41. Merone GM, Tartaglia A, Locatelli M, D’Ovidio C, Rosato E, de Grazia U, et al. Analytical chemistry in the 21st century: Challenges, solutions, and future perspectives of complex matrices quantitative analyses in biological/clinical field. Analytica. 2020 Oct 30;1(1):44–59. Available from:.
  42. Rehman IU, Khan RS, Rehman S. Role of artificial intelligence and vibrational spectroscopy in cancer diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2020 Aug 2;20(8):749–55. Available from:.
  43. Sil S, Mukherjee R, Kumbhar D, Reghu D, Shrungar D, Kumar NS, et al. Raman spectroscopy and artificial intelligence open up accurate detection of pathogens from DNA‐based sub‐species level classification. J Raman Spectrosc. 2021 Dec 5;52(12):2648–59. Available from:.
  44. Wu M, Wang S, Pan S, Terentis AC, Strasswimmer J, Zhu X. Deep learning data augmentation for raman spectroscopy cancer tissue classification. Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 13;11(1):23842. Available from:.
  45. Ling-qiao L, Yan-Hui LI, Lin-Lin YIN, Hui-Hua Y, Yan-Chun F, Li-Hui YIN, et al. Data augmentation of raman spectral and its application research based on DCGAN. Spectrosc Spectr Anal. 2021;41(2):400–7.
  46. Yadav N, Pandey S, Gupta A, Dudani P, Gupta S, Rangarajan K. Data privacy in healthcare: In the era of artificial intelligence. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2023 Nov;14(6):788–92. Available from:.
  47. Gray NA. Artificial intelligence in chemistry. Anal Chim Acta. 1988;210:9–32. Available from:.
  48. Hassija V, Chamola V, Mahapatra A, Singal A, Goel D, Huang K, et al. Interpreting black-box models: A review on explainable artificial intelligence. Cognit Comput. 2024 Jan 24;16(1):45–74. Available from:.
  49. Scorzato L. Reliability and interpretability in science and deep learning. Minds Mach. 2024 Jun 25;34(3):27. Available from:.
  50. Linardatos P, Papastefanopoulos V, Kotsiantis S. Explainable AI: A review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy. 2020 Dec 25;23(1):18. Available from:.
  51. Blake N, Kelly DA, Chanchal A, Kapllani-Mucaj S, Thomas G, Chockler H. SpecReX: Explainable AI for raman spectroscopy. 2025 Mar 18; Available from:.
  52. Le BT. Application of deep learning and near infrared spectroscopy in cereal analysis. Vib Spectrosc. 2020 Jan;106:103009. Available from:.
  53. Wang YT, Li B, Xu XJ, Ren HB, Yin JY, Zhu H, et al. FTIR spectroscopy coupled with machine learning approaches as a rapid tool for identification and quantification of artificial sweeteners. Food Chem. 2020 Jan;303:125404. Available from:.
  54. Raulf AP, Butke J, Menzen L, Küpper C, Großerueschkamp F, Gerwert K, et al. Deep neural networks for the correction of mie scattering in fourier-transformed infrared spectra of biological samples. 2020 Feb 18; Available from:.
  55. Lussier F, Thibault V, Charron B, Wallace GQ, Masson JF. Deep learning and artificial intelligence methods for raman and surface-enhanced raman scattering. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2020 Mar;124:115796. Available from:.
  56. Gutiérrez S, Tardaguila J, Fernández-Novales J, Diago MP. Support vector machine and artificial neural network models for the classification of grapevine varieties using a portable NIR spectrophotometer. Scali M, editor. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 24;10(11):e0143197. Available from:.
  57. Brudzewski K, Kesik A, Kołodziejczyk K, Zborowska U, Ulaczyk J. Gasoline quality prediction using gas chromatography and FTIR spectroscopy: An artificial intelligence approach. Fuel. 2006 Mar;85(4):553–8. Available from:.
  58. Raza A, Xu L, Yamijala S, Lian C, Kwon H, Wong B. A machine learning approach for predicting defluorination of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) for their efficient treatment and removal. 2019. Available from:.
  59. Usman AG, Işik S, Abba SI. Qualitative prediction of Thymoquinone in the high‐performance liquid chromatography optimization method development using artificial intelligence models coupled with ensemble machine learning. Sep Sci Plus. 2022 Oct 2;5(10):579–87. Available from:.
  60. Guo K, Shen Y, Gonzalez-Montiel GA, Huang Y, Zhou Y, Surve M, et al. Artificial intelligence in spectroscopy: Advancing chemistry from prediction to generation and beyond. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization; 2025. p. 10445–54. Available from:.
  61. Kothari R, Jones V, Mena D, Bermúdez Reyes V, Shon Y, Smith JP, et al. Raman spectroscopy and artificial intelligence to predict the bayesian probability of breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 22;11(1):6482. Available from:.
  62. Talari ACS, Rehman S, Rehman IU. Advancing cancer diagnostics with artificial intelligence and spectroscopy: Identifying chemical changes associated with breast cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2019 Oct 3;19(10):929–40. Available from:.
  63. Buhas BA, Toma V, Beauval JB, Andras I, Couți R, Muntean LAM, et al. Label-free SERS of urine components: A powerful tool for discriminating renal cell carcinoma through multivariate analysis and machine learning techniques. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 31;25(7):3891. Available from:.
  64. Yang J, Chen X, Luo C, Li Z, Chen C, Han S, et al. Application of serum SERS technology combined with deep learning algorithm in the rapid diagnosis of immune diseases and chronic kidney disease. Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 21;13(1):15719. Available from:.
  65. Srinidhi CL, Ciga O, Martel AL. Deep neural network models for computational histopathology: A survey. Med Image Anal. 2021 Jan;67:101813. Available from:.
  66. Foti G, Longo C. Deep learning and AI in reducing magnetic resonance imaging scanning time: Advantages and pitfalls in clinical practice. Polish J Radiol. 2024 Sep 13;89:443–51. Available from:.
  67. Bastien F, Lamblin P, Pascanu R, Bergstra J, Goodfellow I, Bergeron A, et al. Theano: new features and speed improvements. 2012 Nov 23; Available from:.
  68. Lumumba V, Kiprotich D, Mpaine M, Makena N, Kavita M. Comparative analysis of cross-validation techniques: LOOCV, K-folds cross-validation, and repeated K-folds cross-validation in machine learning models. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2024 Oct 10;13(5):127–37. Available from:.
  69. Qiu J. An analysis of model evaluation with cross-validation: Techniques, applications, and recent advances. Adv Econ Manag Polit Sci. 2024 Sep 10;99(1):69–72. Available from:.
  70. Dicks A. Exploring the applications of spectroscopic techniques in analytical chemistry. Pharm Anal Chem Open Access. 2024 Feb 1;9(2):1–2. Available from:.
  71. de la Torre-López J, Ramírez A, Romero JR. Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature. Computing. 2023 Oct 11;105(10):2171–94. Available from:.
  72. Sharifani K, Amini M. Machine learning and deep learning: A review of methods and applications. World Inf Technol Eng J. 2023;10(7):3897–904. Available from:.
  73. Kaur C, Chandel R, Pal Singh Brar T, Sharma S. Machine learning and its applications-A review study. CGC Int J Contemp Technol Res. 5(2):365–9. Available from:.
  74. Vargas R, Mosavi A, Ruiz R. Deep learning: A review. 2018. Available from:.
  75. Hippe Z. Problems in the application of artificial intelligence in analytical chemistry. Anal Chim Acta. 1983;150:11–21. Available from:.
  76. Cardoso Rial R. AI in analytical chemistry: Advancements, challenges, and future directions. Talanta. 2024 Jul;274:125949. Available from:.
  77. Baum ZJ, Yu X, Ayala PY, Zhao Y, Watkins SP, Zhou Q. Artificial intelligence in chemistry: Current trends and future directions. J Chem Inf Model. 2021 Jul 26;61(7):3197–212. Available from:.
  78. Workman J, Mark H. Artificial intelligence in analytical spectroscopy, part II: Examples in spectroscopy. Spectroscopy. 2023 Jun 1;38(6):10–5. Available from:.
  79. Şeker A, Diri B, Balik HH. Derin öğrenme yöntemleri ve uygulamaları hakkında bir inceleme. Gazi Mühendislik Bilim Derg. 2017;3(3):47–64. Available from:.
  80. Prasad RD, Sarvalkar PD, Prasad N, Prasad SR, Prasad RS, Prasad RB, et al. A review on spectroscopic techniques for analysis of nanomaterials and biomaterials. ES Energy Environ. 2025;27:1264. Available from:.
  81. Workman J. A review of the latest spectroscopic research in pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical applications. Spectroscopy. 2024 Aug 1;39(6):25–9. Available from:.
  82. Gautam R, Vanga S, Ariese F, Umapathy S. Review of multidimensional data processing approaches for raman and infrared spectroscopy. EPJ Tech Instrum. 2015 Dec 2;2(1):8. Available from:.
  83. Kim Y, Oh D, Huh S, Song D, Jeong S, Kwon J, et al. Deep learning-based statistical noise reduction for multidimensional spectral data. Rev Sci Instrum. 2021 Jul 1;92(7). Available from:.
  84. Houhou R, Bocklitz T. Trends in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and chemometrics applied to chemical data. Anal Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 2;2(3–4):128–41. Available from:.
  85. Sunil M, Pallikkavaliyaveetil N, N Mi, Gopinath A, Chidangil S, Kumar S, et al. Machine learning assisted raman spectroscopy: A viable approach for the detection of microplastics. J Water Process Eng. 2024 Apr;60:105150. Available from:.
  86. Ziani I, Bouakline H, El Guerraf A, El Bachiri A, Marie-Laure Fauconnier, Sher F. Integrating AI and advanced spectroscopic techniques for precision food safety and quality control. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2025 Feb;156:104850. Available from:.
  87. Qi Y, Liu Y, Luo J. Recent application of faman spectroscopy in tumor diagnosis: From conventional methods to artificial intelligence fusion. PhotoniX. 2023 Jul 7;4(1):22. Available from:.
  88. Angulo A, Yang L, Aydil ES, Modestino MA. Machine learning enhanced spectroscopic analysis: Towards autonomous chemical mixture characterization for rapid process optimization. Digit Discov. 2022;1(1):35–44. Available from:.
  89. Pan L, Zhang P, Daengngam C, Peng S, Chongcheawchamnan M. A review of artificial intelligence methods combined with raman spectroscopy to identify the composition of substances. J Raman Spectrosc. 2022 Jan 15;53(1):6–19. Available from:.
  90. Ye Z. Artificial-Intelligence approach for biomedical sample characterization using raman spectroscopy. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2005 Jan;2(1):67–73. Available from:.
  91. Mozaffari MH, Tay LL. Raman spectral analysis of mixtures with one-dimensional convolutional neural network. 2021 Jun 1; Available from:.
  92. Chen X, Wu X, Chen C, Luo C, Shi Y, Li Z, et al. Raman spectroscopy combined with a support vector machine algorithm as a diagnostic technique for primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 29;13(1):5137. Available from:.
  93. Barredo Arrieta A, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Del Ser J, Bennetot A, Tabik S, Barbado A, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Inf Fusion. 2020 Jun;58:82–115. Available from:.
  94. Bjerring JC, Mainz J, Munch L. Deep learning models and the limits of explainable artificial intelligence. Asian J Philos. 2025 Jan 30;4(1):22. Available from:.
  95. Samek W, Wiegand T, Müller KR. Explainable artificial intelligence: Understanding, visualizing and interpreting deep learning models. 2017 Aug 28; Available from:.
  96. Contreras J, Winterfeld A, Popp J, Bocklitz T. Spectral Zones-Based SHAP/LIME: Enhancing interpretability in spectral deep learning models through grouped feature analysis. Anal Chem. 2024 Oct 1;96(39):15588–97. Available from:.
  97. Contreras J, Bocklitz T. Explainable artificial intelligence for spectroscopy data: A review. Pflügers Arch - Eur J Physiol. 2025 Apr 1;477(4):603–15. Available from:.
  98. Oviedo F, Ferres JL, Buonassisi T, Butler KT. Interpretable and explainable machine learning for materials science and chemistry. Accounts Mater Res. 2022 Jun 24;3(6):597–607. Available from:.
  99. Mohammed S, Budach L, Feuerpfeil M, Ihde N, Nathansen A, Noack N, et al. The effects of data quality on machine learning performance on tabular data. Inf Syst. 2025 Jul 1;132:102549. Available from:.
  100. Rahal M, Ahmed BS, Szabados G, Fornstedt T, Samuelsson J. Enhancing machine learning performance through intelligent data quality assessment: An unsupervised data-centric framework. Heliyon. 2025 Feb;11(4):e42777. Available from:.
  101. Davariashtiyani A, Wang B, Hajinazar S, Zurek E, Kadkhodaei S. Impact of data bias on machine learning for crystal compound synthesizability predictions. Mach Learn Sci Technol. 2024 Dec 1;5(4):040501. Available from:.
  102. Bertossi L, Geerts F. Data quality and explainable AI. J Data Inf Qual. 2020 Jun 30;12(2):1–9. Available from:.
  103. Balabin RM, Lomakina EI. Support vector machine regression (SVR/LS-SVM)—an alternative to neural networks (ANN) for analytical chemistry? Comparison of nonlinear methods on near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data. Analyst. 2011;136(8):1703–12. Available from:.
  104. Agatonovic-Kustrin S, Zecevic M, Zivanovic L. Use of ANN modelling in structure–retention relationships of diuretics in RP-HPLC. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1999 Oct;21(1):95–103. Available from:.
  105. Vasiljević T, Onjia A, Čokeša Đ, Laušević M. Optimization of artificial neural network for retention modeling in high-performance liquid chromatography. Talanta. 2004 Oct;64(3):785–90. Available from:.
  106. Afradi A, Ebrahimabadi A. Comparison of artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and gene expression programming (GEP) approaches for predicting TBM penetration rate. SN Appl Sci. 2020 Dec 17;2(12):2004. Available from:.
  107. Murphy S. The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing analytical chemistry techniques to streamline drug development and testing processes. J Anal Bioanal Tech. 2025 Apr 30;16(4):1–2. Available from:.
  108. Galán-Freyle NJ, Ospina-Castro ML, Medina-González AR, Villarreal-González R, Hernández-Rivera SP, Pacheco-Londoño LC. Artificial intelligence assisted mid-infrared laser spectroscopy in situ detection of petroleum in soils. Appl Sci. 2020 Feb 15;10(4):1319. Available from:.
  109. Ain QU, Nazir R, Nawaz A, Shahbaz H, Dilshad A, Mufti IU, et al. Machine learning approach towards quality assurance, challenges and possible strategies in laboratory medicine. J Clin Transl Pathol. 2024 Jun 25;4(2):76–87. Available from:.
  110. Lippi G, Mattiuzzi C, Favaloro E. Artificial intelligence in the pre-analytical phase: State-of-the art and future perspectives. J Med Biochem. 2024;43(1):1–10. Available from:.
  111. Merone GM, Tartaglia A, Locatelli M, D’Ovidio C, Rosato E, de Grazia U, et al. Analytical chemistry in the 21st century: Challenges, solutions, and future perspectives of complex matrices quantitative analyses in biological/clinical field. Analytica. 2020 Oct 30;1(1):44–59. Available from:.
  112. Rehman IU, Khan RS, Rehman S. Role of artificial intelligence and vibrational spectroscopy in cancer diagnostics. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2020 Aug 2;20(8):749–55. Available from:.
  113. Sil S, Mukherjee R, Kumbhar D, Reghu D, Shrungar D, Kumar NS, et al. Raman spectroscopy and artificial intelligence open up accurate detection of pathogens from DNA‐based sub‐species level classification. J Raman Spectrosc. 2021 Dec 5;52(12):2648–59. Available from:.
  114. Wu M, Wang S, Pan S, Terentis AC, Strasswimmer J, Zhu X. Deep learning data augmentation for raman spectroscopy cancer tissue classification. Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 13;11(1):23842. Available from:.
  115. Yadav N, Pandey S, Gupta A, Dudani P, Gupta S, Rangarajan K. Data privacy in healthcare: In the era of artificial intelligence. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2023 Nov;14(6):788–92. Available from:.
  116. Gray NA. Artificial intelligence in chemistry. Anal Chim Acta. 1988;210:9–32. Available from:.
  117. Hassija V, Chamola V, Mahapatra A, Singal A, Goel D, Huang K, et al. Interpreting black-box models: A review on explainable artificial intelligence. Cognit Comput. 2024 Jan 24;16(1):45–74. Available from:.
  118. Scorzato L. Reliability and interpretability in science and deep learning. Minds Mach. 2024 Jun 25;34(3):27. Available from:.
  119. Linardatos P, Papastefanopoulos V, Kotsiantis S. Explainable AI: A review of machine learning interpretability methods. Entropy. 2020 Dec 25;23(1):18. Available from:.
  120. Blake N, Kelly DA, Chanchal A, Kapllani-Mucaj S, Thomas G, Chockler H. SpecReX: Explainable AI for raman spectroscopy. 2025 Mar 18; Available from:.
  121. Le BT. Application of deep learning and near infrared spectroscopy in cereal analysis. Vib Spectrosc. 2020 Jan;106:103009. Available from:.
  122. Wang YT, Li B, Xu XJ, Ren HB, Yin JY, Zhu H, et al. FTIR spectroscopy coupled with machine learning approaches as a rapid tool for identification and quantification of artificial sweeteners. Food Chem. 2020 Jan;303:125404. Available from:.
  123. Raulf AP, Butke J, Menzen L, Küpper C, Großerueschkamp F, Gerwert K, et al. Deep neural networks for the correction of mie scattering in fourier-transformed infrared spectra of biological samples. 2020 Feb 18; Available from:.
  124. Lussier F, Thibault V, Charron B, Wallace GQ, Masson JF. Deep learning and artificial intelligence methods for raman and surface-enhanced raman scattering. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2020 Mar;124:115796. Available from:.
  125. Gutiérrez S, Tardaguila J, Fernández-Novales J, Diago MP. Support vector machine and artificial neural network models for the classification of grapevine varieties using a portable NIR spectrophotometer. Scali M, editor. PLoS One. 2015 Nov 24;10(11):e0143197. Available from:.
  126. Brudzewski K, Kesik A, Kołodziejczyk K, Zborowska U, Ulaczyk J. Gasoline quality prediction using gas chromatography and FTIR spectroscopy: An artificial intelligence approach. Fuel. 2006 Mar;85(4):553–8. Available from:.
  127. Raza A, Xu L, Yamijala S, Lian C, Kwon H, Wong B. A machine learning approach for predicting defluorination of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) for their efficient treatment and removal. 2019. Available from:.
  128. Usman AG, Işik S, Abba SI. Qualitative prediction of Thymoquinone in the high‐performance liquid chromatography optimization method development using artificial intelligence models coupled with ensemble machine learning. Sep Sci Plus. 2022 Oct 2;5(10):579–87. Available from:.
  129. Guo K, Shen Y, Gonzalez-Montiel GA, Huang Y, Zhou Y, Surve M, et al. Artificial intelligence in spectroscopy: Advancing chemistry from prediction to generation and beyond. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization; 2025. p. 10445–54. Available from:.
  130. Kothari R, Jones V, Mena D, Bermúdez Reyes V, Shon Y, Smith JP, et al. Raman spectroscopy and artificial intelligence to predict the bayesian probability of breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 22;11(1):6482. Available from:.
  131. Talari ACS, Rehman S, Rehman IU. Advancing cancer diagnostics with artificial intelligence and spectroscopy: Identifying chemical changes associated with breast cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2019 Oct 3;19(10):929–40. Available from:.
  132. Buhas BA, Toma V, Beauval JB, Andras I, Couți R, Muntean LAM, et al. Label-free SERS of urine components: A powerful tool for discriminating renal cell carcinoma through multivariate analysis and machine learning techniques. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 31;25(7):3891. Available from:.
  133. Yang J, Chen X, Luo C, Li Z, Chen C, Han S, et al. Application of serum SERS technology combined with deep learning algorithm in the rapid diagnosis of immune diseases and chronic kidney disease. Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 21;13(1):15719. Available from:.
  134. Srinidhi CL, Ciga O, Martel AL. Deep neural network models for computational histopathology: A survey. Med Image Anal. 2021 Jan;67:101813. Available from:.
  135. Foti G, Longo C. Deep learning and AI in reducing magnetic resonance imaging scanning time: Advantages and pitfalls in clinical practice. Polish J Radiol. 2024 Sep 13;89:443–51. Available from:.
  136. Bastien F, Lamblin P, Pascanu R, Bergstra J, Goodfellow I, Bergeron A, et al. Theano: new features and speed improvements. 2012 Nov 23; Available from:.
  137. Lumumba V, Kiprotich D, Mpaine M, Makena N, Kavita M. Comparative analysis of cross-validation techniques: LOOCV, K-folds cross-validation, and repeated K-folds cross-validation in machine learning models. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2024 Oct 10;13(5):127–37. Available from:.
  138. Qiu J. An analysis of model evaluation with cross-validation: Techniques, applications, and recent advances. Adv Econ Manag Polit Sci. 2024 Sep 10;99(1):69–72. Available from:.
  139. Dicks A. Exploring the applications of spectroscopic techniques in analytical chemistry. Pharm Anal Chem Open Access. 2024 Feb 1;9(2):1–2. Available from:.
  140. de la Torre-López J, Ramírez A, Romero JR. Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature. Computing. 2023 Oct 11;105(10):2171–94. Available from:.