Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi / 2019 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1

Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Mental Foramen Diameter: A retrospective study

Mental Foramen Çapının Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi ile Değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif çalışma

Pages
59–63
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean MF diameter in both bucco-lingual and top-bottom was found to be greater in males than in females on both sides.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to determine the bucco-lingual and the top-bottom distance of Mental Foramen (MF) by using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The CBCT images of 300 subjects (152 females and 148 males with ages ranging from 9 to 74 years) were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean MF diameter in both bucco-lingual and top-bottom was found to be greater in males than in females on both sides.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the bucco-lingual and the top-bottom distance of Mental Foramen (MF) by using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). The CBCT images of 300 subjects (152 females and 148 males with ages ranging from 9 to 74 years) were included in this study. The distance from the buccal border to the lingual border and the top-bottom distance of MF were measured by using the crosssectional images in the 1 mm cross-sectional range. Mann-Whitney U Test was used to compare the mean values of MF diameter between genders and also in each gender for left and right sides. The mean MF diameter in both bucco-lingual and top-bottom was significantly greater in males than in females on both left and right sides. Also, while there was no significant difference in bucco-lingual diameter of MF between the right and left sides in both genders, the mean top-bottom diameter of MF was significantly different between right and left sides in males. The mean MF diameter in both bucco-lingual and top-bottom was found to be greater in males than in females on both sides.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Mental Foramen (MF)'in bukko-lingual çapını ve üst-alt mesafesini Konik Işınlı Bilgisayarlı Tomografi (KIBT) kullanarak incelemektir. Çalışmaya 300 bireye ait (yaşları 9 ile 74 arasında değişen 152 kadın ve 148 erkek) KIBT görüntüleri dahil edildi. MF'nin bukkal sınırından lingual sınırına olan mesafe ve MF'nin üst-alt mesafesi 1 mm kesit aralığındaki çapraz kesit görüntüleri kullanılarak ölçüldü. Mann-Whitney U testi, MF'nin ortalama çapının cinsiyetler arasında ve ayrıca her bir cinsiyette sol ve sağ taraflar için karşılaştırılmasında kullanılmıştır. Hem bukko-lingual hem de üst-alt yönde ortalama MF çapı, erkeklerde hem sol hem de sağ tarafta kadınlardan anlamlı derecede daha yüksekti. Ayrıca, her iki cinsiyette de sağ ve sol taraflar arasında MF'nin bukko-lingual çapında anlamlı bir fark bulunmazken, MF'nin ortalama üst-alt çapı erkeklerde sağ ve sol taraflar arasında anlamlı derecede farklıydı. Bukko-lingual ve üst-alt yöndeki ortalama MF çapının erkeklerde her iki tarafta da kadınlardan daha fazla olduğu bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYTUĞAR, E., LAÇİN, N. (2019). Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Mental Foramen Diameter: A retrospective study. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 1, 59–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/151425

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. Clinical assessment and surgical implications of anatomic challenges in the anterior mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 219-225.
  2. Juodzbalys G, Wang HL, Sabalys G. Anatomy of mandibular vital structures. Part I: mandibular canal and inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle in relation with dental implantology. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2010; 1: e2. Farman AG, Nortje CJ. Panoramic Radiographic Appearance of the Mandibular Canal in Health and in Disease. In: Panoramic Radiology. Springer, Berlin, 2007, 107-118.
  3. Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. Journal of periodontology 2006; 77: 1933-1943.
  4. Kim IS, Kim SG, Kim YK, Kim JD. Position of the mental foramen in a Korean population: a clinical and radiographic study. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 404-11.
  5. Neves FS, Ramírez-Sotelo LR; Roque-Torres G et al. Detection of bifid mandibular condyle by panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Braz J Oral Sci 2013; 12: 16-19.
  6. Gunduz K, Buyuk C, Egrioglu E. Evaluation of the Prevalence of Bifid Mandibular Condyle Detected on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images in a Turkish Population. Int J Morphol 2015; 33: 43-47.
  7. Fishel D, Buchner A, Hershkowith A, Kaffe I. Roentgenologic study of the mental foramen. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976; 41: 682-686. Liebgott B. The Anatomical Basis of Dentistry. 2nd Ed: Elsevier Mosby, 2001.
  8. Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. Journal of periodontology 2006; 77: 1933-1943.
  9. Oliveira-Santos C, Capelozza AL, Dezzoti MS, Fischer CM, Poleti ML, Rubira-Bullen IR. Visibility of the mandibular canal on CBCT cross-sectional images. J Appl Oral Sci 2011; 19: 240-243. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003; 6 Suppl 1: 31-36; discussion 179-182.
  10. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 126-130.
  11. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 707-30. Üner DD, Izol BS, Ipek F. The evaluation of the prevalence and localizations and of antral septa in people living in and around Diyarbakir using cone beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2018; 6