Journals / Eastern Journal of Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Peripartum Hysterectomy; Ten Years of Experience of a Tertiary Center

Pages
175–182
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall rate of peripartum hysterectomy was 99 of 22242 or 4.4 per 1,000 deliveries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study is to assess the 10-year incidence of peripartum hysterectomy that was performed in the province of Van, Turkey, as well as its clinical results.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, we retrospectively examined all patients who underwent peripartum hysterectomy, which was performed at Van Yuzuncu Yil University Dursun Odabas Medical Center between 2010 and 2020. 99 patients who underwent hysterectomy due to severe bleeding, which could not be stopped despite conservative tre atments within 24 hours following the delivery, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall rate of peripartum hysterectomy was 99 of 22242 or 4.4 per 1,000 deliveries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The objective of this study is to assess the 10-year incidence of peripartum hysterectomy that was performed in the province of Van, Turkey, as well as its clinical results. In this study, we retrospectively examined all patients who underwent peripartum hysterectomy, which was performed at Van Yuzuncu Yil University Dursun Odabas Medical Center between 2010 and 2020. 99 patients who underwent hysterectomy due to severe bleeding, which could not be stopped despite conservative tre atments within 24 hours following the delivery, were included in the study. The overall rate of peripartum hysterectomy was 99 of 22242 or 4.4 per 1,000 deliveries. The mean maternal age was 31.98 ± 5.41 years. The most common indications for peripartum hy sterectomy are placental adhesion disorders (70.7%), uterine atony (25.2%), and uterine rupture (4%). Ultimately, the most common indication for peripartum hysterectomy is placental adhesion disorders. The rise in the number of cesarean section might have increased the incidence of placental adhesion disorders. Thus, patients should be provided with healthcare in centers that have adequate equipment and staff.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİRİK, D., KARAMAN, E., OKYAY, T. Y., KÜÇÜKBAŞ, G. N., KARAASLAN, O., ALKIŞ, I., GÜL, A., ŞAHİN, H. G., KOLUSARI, A. (2021). Evaluation of Peripartum Hysterectomy; Ten Years of Experience of a Tertiary Center. Eastern Journal of Medicine, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 175–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/151403

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Clark SL, Hankins GD. Preventing maternal death: 10 clinical diamonds. Obstetrics and gynecology 2012; 119: 360-364
  2. Knight M. Peripartum hysterectomy in the UK: management and outcomes of the associated haemorrhage. BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2007; 114: 1380-1387
  3. Yucel O, Ozdemir I, Yucel N, Somunkiran A. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a 9-year review. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2006; 274: 84-87
  4. Whiteman MK, Kuklina E, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Meikle SF, Posner SF, et al. Incidence and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy. Obstetrics and gynecology 2006; 108: 1486-1492
  5. Huque S, Roberts I, Fawole B, Chaudhri R, Arulkumaran S, Shakur-Still H. Risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy among women with postpartum haemorrhage: analysis of data from the WOMAN trial. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2018; 18: 186
  6. Keskin HL, Engin ÜY, Sanisoğlu S, Karametmetoğlu S, Özcan A, Çelen Ş, et al. The value of autopsy to determine the cause of maternal deaths in Turkey. J Turk ger Gynecol Assoc 2018; 19: 210-214
  7. Viner RM, Coffey C, Mathers C, Bloem P, Costello A, Santelli J, et al. 50-year mortality trends in children and young people: a study of 50 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries. Lancet (London, England) 2011; 377: 1162-1174
  8. Organization WH. Evaluating the quality of care for severe pregnancy complications: the WHO near-miss approach for maternal health. 2011
  9. Govindappagari S, Wright JD, Ananth CV, Huang Y, DʼAlton ME, Friedman AM. Risk of Peripartum Hysterectomy and Center Hysterectomy and Delivery Volume. Obstetrics and gynecology 2016; 128: 1215-1224
  10. Sharma B, Sikka P, Jain V, Jain K, Bagga R, Suri V. Peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary care hospital: Epidemiology and outcomes. Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology 2017; 33: 324- 328
  11. Zeteroglu S, Ustun Y, Engin-Ustun Y, Sahin G, Kamaci M. Peripartum hysterectomy in a teaching hospital in the eastern region of Turkey. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology 2005; 120: 57-62
  12. Agrawal S, Yadav R, Raghunandan C, Dhingra S, Kaur HJAJoMS. Peripartum hysterectomy in a teaching hospital in India. Peripartum hysterectomy in a teaching hospital in India 2013; 4: 5-9
  13. Korejo R, Nasir A, Yasmin H, Bhutta S. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy. JPMA The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 2012; 62: 1322-1325
  14. Flood KM, Said S, Geary M, Robson M, Fitzpatrick C,