Journals / Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Determination of Electrical Properties and Microhardness in Fe-Mn-Ti-Sn Heusler Composition

Mehtap Payveren Arıkan(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-8037-4904
Fermin Ak(MALATYA TURGUT ÖZAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DARENDE BEKİR ILICAK MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0003-3238-4638
Buket Saatçi(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-1351-5279
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-06-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the composition-dependent microhardness measurements of the samples were determined using the Vickers hardness test and the average microhardness values obtained were measured as 481-716 HV0.5.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fe-Mn-Ti-Sn alloy is known as both Heusler and shape memory alloy and electrical conductivity and microhardness studies related to this alloy are insufficient.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the study, Fe-Mn-Ti-Sn Heusler [Fe2-xMnxTiSn (0≤x≤2)] alloy was selected Fe2TiSn, Fe1.5Mn0.5TiSn, FeMnTiSn, Fe0.5Mn1.5TiSn, Mn2TiSn components were obtained in these ratios for the first time using arc melter melting furnace.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the composition-dependent microhardness measurements of the samples were determined using the Vickers hardness test and the average microhardness values obtained were measured as 481-716 HV0.5.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Four Point Probe Technique · Heusler alloys · Vickers Hardness

Abstract

Fe-Mn-Ti-Sn alloy is known as both Heusler and shape memory alloy and electrical conductivity and microhardness studies related to this alloy are insufficient. In the study, Fe-Mn-Ti-Sn Heusler [Fe2-xMnxTiSn (0≤x≤2)] alloy was selected Fe2TiSn, Fe1.5Mn0.5TiSn, FeMnTiSn, Fe0.5Mn1.5TiSn, Mn2TiSn components were obtained in these ratios for the first time using arc melter melting furnace. Temperature dependent electrical measurements of the obtained samples were determined by four point probe method (FPPT). The electrical resistance values of the samples at 330K were obtained as 0.14-2.25x10-6 (m) and 0.02-0.49 x10-6 (m) at 750 K. In addition, the temperature coefficient of electrical resistivity value was calculated as  (0.03-1.29)x (10-3 K-1). Phases belonging to each composition were determined by examining the XRD peaks. Microstructures of the samples were obtained by SEM, EDX and MAPPING images. Finally, the composition-dependent microhardness measurements of the samples were determined using the Vickers hardness test and the average microhardness values obtained were measured as 481-716 HV0.5.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arıkan, M. P., Ak, F., Saatçi, B. (2025). Determination of Electrical Properties and Microhardness in Fe-Mn-Ti-Sn Heusler Composition. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials, Volume: 8 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.54565/jphcfum.1680077

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ullakko, K., Huang, J. K., Kantner, C., O'handley, R. C., & Kokorin, V. V. (1996). Large magnetic-field-induced strains in Ni2MnGa single crystals. Applied Physics Letters, 69(13), 1966-1968.
  2. Kainuma, R., Imano, Y., Ito, W., Sutou, Y., Morito, H., Okamoto, S.,. & Ishida, K. (2006). Magnetic-field-induced shape recovery by reverse phase transformation. Nature, 439(7079), 957-960.
  3. Lütjering, G., & Albrecht, (2003). J. D GINI WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA|.
  4. Billur, C. A., Gerçekcioglu, E., Bozoklu, M., Saatçi, B., Ari, M., & Nair, F., (2015). The electrical, thermal conductivity, microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Sn–Pb ternary alloys. Solid State Sciences, 46, 107-115.
  5. Sartale, S. D., Ansari, A. A., & Rezvani, S. J. (2013). Influence of Ti film thickness and oxidation temperature on TiO2 thin film formation via thermal oxidation of sputtered Ti film. Materials science in semiconductor processing, 16(6), 2005-2012.
  6. Byun, J. M., Choi, H. R., Kim, S. H., Suk, M. J., & Do Kim, Y. (2017). Formation of nanostructured rutile TiO2 synthesized on Ti powder via thermal oxidation. Applied Surface Science, 415, 43-48.
  7. Saito, T., & Kamishima, S. (2018). Magnetic and thermoelectric properties of Fe–Ti–Sn alloys. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 55(2), 1-4.
  8. Tkachuk, A. V., Akselrud, L. G., Stadnyk, Y. V., & Bodak, O. I. (2000). Isothermal section of the Ti–Mn–Sn system and crystal structure of the TiMnSn4 compound. Journal of alloys and compounds, 312(1-2), 284-287.
  9. Wang, Y., Yang, F., Shen, C., Yang, J., Hu, X., & Fei, Y. (2024). Electrical Resistivity and Phase Evolution of Fe–N Binary System at High Pressure and High Temperature. Minerals, 14(5), 467.
  10. Kainuma, R., Imano, Y., Ito, W., Sutou, Y., Morito, H., Okamoto, S.,. & Ishida, K. (2006). Magnetic-field-induced shape recovery by reverse phase transformation. Nature, 439(7079), 957-960.