Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Assessment of the Entrepreneurial Characteristics and Hopelessness Status of Nurses Working in Theonetraining and Research Hospital

Pages
208–215
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The nurses with higher levels of hope are self-confident, have higher levels to take risks with more need to accomplish.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND/AIMS Due to the vast knowledge they obtain during the education process, nurses become self-confident and successful professionals with a life vision,open to risk taking and change.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This research included 140 nurses working in the Training and Research Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The nurses with higher levels of hope are self-confident, have higher levels to take risks with more need to accomplish.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

BACKGROUND/AIMS Due to the vast knowledge they obtain during the education process, nurses become self-confident and successful professionals with a life vision,open to risk taking and change. MATERIALS and METHODS The aim of this study was to determine the entrepreneurial characteristics of the nurses, as well as their opinions and the hope or hopelessness status. This research included 140 nurses working in the Training and Research Hospital. The research wasdescriptive and in the screening model. The Beck hopelessness scale (BHS) and the entrepreneurship scale (ES) were utilized as the data collection tools.To determine the hypothesis tests to be used in the comparison of entrepreneurial tendencies of nurses by their indentifying characteristics and the Beckhopelessness scale, the compliance of the dataset with the normal distribution was tested using the Kolmogrov–Smirnov test, and as a result of the test, the scores from both the scales were found to be compliant with the normal distribution. The Levene test was performed to test the homogeneity of variances, which were then identified as homogenous. Therefore, parametric hypothesis tests were used in the research. RESULTS In the comparison of entrepreneurial tendencies of nurses consideringthe identifier characteristics and Beckhopelessness scores, the t-test was usedwhen the number of categories in the independent variance was 2, and the variance analysis was performed when it was >2. In addition, the correlations between the entrepreneurial tendencies and Beckhopelessness scores were tested with the Pearson correlation analysis. CONCLUSION Therefore, with the increase in the scores obtained by the nurses from the Beck hopelessness scale in the sub-dimension of feelings about future, the scores from the sub-dimensions of self-confidence, innovation, need to accomplish, locus of control and taking risks under the entrepreneurship scale also increase. The nurses with higher levels of hope are self-confident, have higher levels to take risks with more need to accomplish.

🔖

Cite This Article

NURLUÖZ, Ö., ESMAEILZADEH, S. (2019). Assessment of the Entrepreneurial Characteristics and Hopelessness Status of Nurses Working in Theonetraining and Research Hospital. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 208–215. https://ajindex.com/articles/151002

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Aytaç Ö, İlhan S. Girişimcilik ve girişimci kültür: Sosyolojik bir perspektif. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2007; 18: 101-20
  2. Cansız E. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Girişimcilik Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi: Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. 2007
  3. Dayyhoff N, Moore P. Entrepreneurial clinical nurse specialists. Innovators of patient care. Clin Nurs Special 2002; 16(5): 274-6. [CrossRef] 4. Dayyhoff N. Think like an entrepreneur. Clin Nurs Special 2005; 19(2): 65-6. [CrossRef] 5. Petersen JA. 10 keys to becoming a successful fitness entrepreneur. ACSM's Health Fitness Journal 2008; 12(2): 50. [CrossRef] 6. De Jong JPJ, Vermeulen PAM. Determinants of product innovation in small firms: A comparison across industries. ISBJ 2006; 34(6): 587-609. [CrossRef] 7. Langerak F, Hultink EJ, Robben HSJ. The impact of market orientation, product advantage, and launch proficiency on new product performance and organizational performance. JPIM 2044; 21(2): 79-94. [CrossRef] 8 Boso N, Cadogan JW, Story VM. Entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation as drivers of product innovation success: a study of exporters from a developing economy. ISBJ 2013; 31: 57-81. [CrossRef] 9. Anderson BS, Eshima Y. The influence of firm age and intangible resources on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth among Japanese SMEs. J Bus Ventur 2013; 28: 413-29. [CrossRef] 10. Naman JL, Slevin DP. Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: a model and empirical tests. Strategic Management J 1993; 14(2): 137-53. [CrossRef] 11. Covin JG, Slevin DP. A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior. Entrepreneurship theory and practice. Baylor University 1991; 7-20. [CrossRef] 12. Okpara JO. Entrepreneurial orientation and export performance: evidence from an emergent economy. Int Rev Bus Res Papers 2009; 5(6): 195-211
  4. Jiang X, Yang Y, Pei YL, Wang G. Entrepreneurial orientation, strategic alliances, and firm performance: inside the black box. Long Range Planning 2016; 49: 103-16. [CrossRef] 14. Engelen A, Schmidt S, Buchsteiner M. The simultaneous influence of national culture and market turbulence on entrepreneurial orientation: a nine-country study. J Int Manag 2015; 21:18-30. [CrossRef] 15. Özdevecioğlu M, Cingöz A. Sosyal girişimcilik ve sosyal girişimciler: teorik çerçeve. Erciyes Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler