SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Individual Differences in Education / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

University as Perceived by Neurodiverse Individuals: A Photovoice Study

Zehra Kurşun Şen(FATİH SULTAN MEHMET VAKIF ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9628-2924
Esra Macaroğlu Akgül(FATİH SULTAN MEHMET VAKIF ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0001-6897-538X
Tuğba Bingöl(FATIH SULTAN MEHMET VAKIF UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION)0000-0002-1104-2244
Gökçen Göçen(FATIH SULTAN MEHMET VAKIF UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION)0000-0001-7552-8406
Hatice Mertoğlu(MARMARA UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3172-7443
Pages
75–88
Publication Date
2025-06-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Data displays that although participants highlighted different aspects of the university, mostly social aspects and spatial properties of it were visible in their photographs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This is a part of paper series developed by neurodiversity and learning lab researchers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the very beginning of the research, all participants attended to a 1-hour workshop in which they learned basic principles of taking pictures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Data displays that although participants highlighted different aspects of the university, mostly social aspects and spatial properties of it were visible in their photographs.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Neurodiversity · autism · perception

Abstract

This is a part of paper series developed by neurodiversity and learning lab researchers. Special needs individuals’ perceptions and definitions of financial literacy, money use, friendship are among the research focus of the lab. The lab researchers believe neurodiversity approach to autism and focus on how neurodiverse people make meaning of their everyday experiences. Therefore, this paper examines four young boys’, three autistic and one with down syndrome, perceptions of university with photovoice method. Photovoice is a way of communication by pictures. At the very beginning of the research, all participants attended to a 1-hour workshop in which they learned basic principles of taking pictures. One of the researchers was leading the workshop and she let participants practice picture taking with mobile phones. The research was designed as two consecutive sessions. In the first session, the participants were asked to explain their perceptions about university by taking pictures. Each of the participants took at least 10 pictures and they were asked to choose the best 4 ones to explain what university is. Then the researchers interviewed each participant in an unstructured form. In the second session, the researchers used the pictures of different old universities like İstanbul and Bogazici Universities along with the picture of FSMVU, where all participants attended, and asked them to look at the pictures and define what university is. Data collected through two sessions were analyzed by coding pictures and transcripts of interviews. Data displays that although participants highlighted different aspects of the university, mostly social aspects and spatial properties of it were visible in their photographs.

Özet

This is a part of paper series developed by neurodiversity and learning lab researchers. Special needs individuals’ perceptions and definitions of financial literacy, money use, friendship are among the research focus of the lab. The lab researchers believe neurodiversity approach to autism and focus on how neurodiverse people make meaning of their everyday experiences. Therefore, this paper examines four young boys’, three autistic and one with down syndrome, perceptions of university with photovoice method. Photovoice is a way of communication by pictures. At the very beginning of the research, all participants attended to a 1-hour workshop in which they learned basic principles of taking pictures. One of the researchers was leading the workshop and she let participants practice picture taking with mobile phones. The research was designed as two consecutive sessions. In the first session, the participants were asked to explain their perceptions about university by taking pictures. Each of the participants took at least 10 pictures and they were asked to choose the best 4 ones to explain what university is. Then the researchers interviewed each participant in an unstructured form. In the second session, the researchers used the pictures of different old universities like İstanbul and Bogazici Universities along with the picture of FSMVU, where all participants attended, and asked them to look at the pictures and define what university is. Data collected through two sessions were analyzed by coding pictures and transcripts of interviews. Data displays that although participants highlighted different aspects of the university, mostly social aspects and spatial properties of it were visible in their photographs.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şen, Z. K., Akgül, E. M., Bingöl, T., Göçen, G., Mertoğlu, H. (2025). University as Perceived by Neurodiverse Individuals: A Photovoice Study. Journal of Individual Differences in Education, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.47156/jide.1677114

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (55)

  1. Agarwal, N., Moya, E. M., Yasui, N. Y., & Seymour, C. (2015). Participatory action research with college students with disabilities: Photovoice for an inclusive campus. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), 243-250. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1074679.pdf
  2. Akdemir, S. (2023). Covid-19 Pandemi sürecinde ilkokul 1. sınıf öğrencilerinin ‘Okul’ kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıları. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (AKEF) Dergisi, 5(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.38151/akef.2023.42
  3. Akgül, M. Ş. (2021). Undergraduates’ perception and expectation of university education. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(1), 373-384. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i1.3547
  4. Agarwal, N., Moya, E. M., Yasui, N. Y., & Seymour, C. (2015). Participatory action research with college students with disabilities: Photovoice for an inclusive campus. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), 243-250. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1074679
  5. Ali, A., Tariq, R. H., & Topping, J. (2009). Students' perception of university teaching behaviours. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(6), 631-647. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903315391
  6. Aslan, H., & Doğan, Ü. (2016). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin devam ettikleri okulları ile bilim ve sanat merkezine ilişkin metaforik algıları: Karşılaştırmalı durum çalışması. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 335-350. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2016.16.2- 5000191890
  7. Atbaşı, Z., & Özdemir, C. (2020). Türkiye’de özel eğitim hizmetlerinin sunumu. U. Sak & S. Toraman (Ed.), Türkiye’de özel eğitim hizmetleri (pp. 49-71). Ankara: MEB Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü.
  8. Avcı, D., & Doğan, T. (2020). Algılanan Üniversite Desteği ve Yapısı Ölçeğinin (AÜDYÖ) Türkçeye uyarlanması ve ilk yıl üniversite öğrencilerinin algıladıkları üniversite desteği. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(3), 1494-1529. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.853994
  9. Brake, L. R., Schleien, S. J., Miller, K. D., & Walton, G. (2012). Photovoice: A tour through the camera lens of self-advocates. Social Advocacy ve Systems Change, 3(1), 44-53. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237079996_Photovoice_A_Tour_Through_the_Camer a_Lens_of_Self-Advocates
  10. Chappell, A. L. (2000). Emergence of participatory methodology in learning difficulty research: Understanding the context. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3156.2000.00004.x.
  11. Chio, V. C. M., & Fandt, P. M. (2007). Photovoice in the diversity classroom: Engagement, voice, and the “Eye/I” of the camera. Journal of Management Education, 31(4):484-504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562906288124
  12. Cooper, C., Sorensen, W., & Yarbrough, S. (2017). Visualising the health of communities: Using Photovoice as a pedagogical tool in the college classroom. Health Education Journal, 76(4):454–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0017896917691790
  13. Courcy, I., & Koniou, I. (2022). A scoping review of the use of photo-elicitation and photovoice with autistic and neurodiverse people. Moving towards more inclusive research?, Disability & Society, 39(5), 1317-1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2137391
  14. Çalık, E. (2008). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin iyimserlik düzeylerinin ve okula ilişkin algılarının incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=4EW04lOJjt7rn7Gq9ZHqsw&no=f mrLrCNOp9cMeQQmff-liQ
  15. Doğanay, A., & Sarı, M. (2006). Öğrencilerin üniversitedeki yaşam kalitesine ilişkin algılarının demokratik yaşam kültürü çerçevesinde değerlendirilmesi (Çukurova Üniversitesi örneği). Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 107-128. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tebd/issue/26113/275086
  16. Engin Demir, C. (2007). Metaphors as a reflection of middle school students' perceptions of school: A cross-cultural analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(2), 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701240795
  17. Eş, H., & Öztürk Geren, N. (2014). Öğrenci ve velilerin çocuk üniversitesi algısı. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3, 94-105. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/295287
  18. Ford, D. Y., & Ill, J. H. (2008). Perceptions and attitudes of black students toward school, achievement and other educational variables. Child Development, 67(3), 1141-1152. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131884
  19. Girli, A., & Atasoy, S. (2012). The views of students with intellectual disabilities or autism regarding their school experience and their peers in inclusion. Buca Eğitim Dergisi, 32, 16-30. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/231627
  20. Griffin, E., & Pollak, D. (2009). Student Experiences of Neurodiversity in Higher Education: Insights from the BRAINHE Project. Dyslexia, 15, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.383
  21. Grigal, M., & Hart, D. (2010). Think College! Postsecondary Education Options for Students with Intellectual Disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509570
  22. Hayırsever, F. (2019). Perceptions of high school students about university. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(9), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i9.4383
  23. Hrbackova, K., & Hrncirikova, Z. (2022). The perception of school life from the perspective of popular and rejected students. Front. Psychol, 13(80), 16-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.801611
  24. Hoy, W. K., & Hannum, J. (1997). Middle school clmate: an empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33, 290-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X97033003003
  25. Jirásek, I., & Sochor, F. (2023). Behind the words: Visual insights into students’ perception of university study of tourism, leisure, and recreation. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 35(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2023.2205145
  26. Kaya G. N. (2020). Özel eğitim gereksinimi olan çocukların resimlerinin analizi. Euroasia Congress on Scientific Researchess and Recent Trends-6, 559-571. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353827278_OZEL_EGITIM_GEREKSINIMI_OLAN_COCU KLARIN_RESIMLERININ_ANALIZI
  27. Korkmaz, F., & Bağçeci, B. (2013). Lise öğrencilerinin ‘‘üniversite’’ kavramına ilişkin metaforik algıların incelenmesi. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,2(1),187-204. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/buefad/issue/3812/51101
  28. Korucuk, M. (2023). Üniversite öğrencilerinin akademik, sosyo-kültürel ve ekonomik sorunları: Fotoses uygulaması. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (AUJEF), 7(4), 1260-1287. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1224078
  29. Kunt, K., & Tortop, H. S. (2013). Türkiye’deki üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin bilim ve sanat merkezlerine ilişkin metaforik algıları. Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 117- 127.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/uyed/issue/21496/230501
  30. Köhler, W. (1967). Gestalt psychology. Psychologische Forschung, 31(1), 18-30.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422382
  31. Lewis, C. (2017). Creating Inclusive Campus Communities: The Vital Role of Peer Mentorship in Inclusive Higher Education. Metropolitan Universities, 28(3), 20-29.https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1152708
  32. Lin, Y. (2010). Taiwanese university students’ perceptions of university life. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515071003776067
  33. MEB. (2018, Temmuz 7). Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği Mevzuat. www.meb.gov.tr
  34. McNiff, S. (2018). Philosophical and practical foundations of artistic inquiry. In P. Leavy (Ed.), Handbook of arts-based research (pp. 22–36). New York, NY: Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Handbook-of-Arts-Based-Research/Patricia- Leavy/9781462540389/contents?srsltid=AfmBOoq9qeR0MtHkwHSDZVuZupcF8QMXrK_JUjtB5 P2El89eAruMm2Ol
  35. Ogurlu, Ü., Öpengin, E., & Hızlı, E. (2015). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin okul ve öğretmene ilişkin metaforik algıları. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 46, 67-83. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/dpusbe/issue/4788/66085
  36. Özdemir, M., & Kalaycı, H. (2013). Okul bağlılığı ve metaforik okul algısı üzerine bir inceleme: Çankırı ili örneği. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(4), 2125-2137. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2013.4.1680
  37. Öztabak, M. (2017). İlkokul 1. ve 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin okul algısı. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 31(1), 103- 124. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yead/issue/29464/316482
  38. Pemik, K., & Deniz, L. (2017). Kaynaştırma öğrencı̇lerı̇nı̇n okul ortamlarına yönelı̇k algıları. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(41), 76-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.11967
  39. Reese, R. F., Seitz, C. M., Gosling, M., & Craig, H. (2020). Using photovoice to foster a student vision for natural spaces on a college campus in the Pacific Northwest United States. Internatıonal Journal of Environmental Health Research, 30(3), 296-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2019.1593950
  40. Sarmento, Z. C. D., Marques, C. S., Santos, G., & Ferreira, T. (2023). Higher education students’ perception of university social responsibility, satisfaction, service quality, and sustainable development goals 2030. EDULEARN23 Proceedings, 4516-4522. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2023.1194
  41. Segura-Mariño, A. G., Fernández-Sande, M., & Paniagua-Rojano, F. J. (2021). Percepción de estudiantes sobre la comunicación institucional universitaria. Cuadernos.info, (50), 299-322. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.50.27617
  42. Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (2009). Educational pychology. New Jersey: Pearson. https://www.amazon.com/Educational-Psychology-2nd-Robert-Sternberg/dp/0205626076
  43. Sudirman, E. P. (2023). Students’ perception of school environment and its impact on English academic achievement. Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya, 6(4), 1671-1688. https://e- journals.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JBSSB/article/view/11534
  44. Talas, S., Talas, Y., & Sönmez, A. (2013). Bilim sanat merkezlerine devam eden üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin okullarında yaşadıkları problemler. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(1), 42-50. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/210623
  45. Toprakçı, E., & Gülmez, D. (2018). Velilerin penceresinden öğrencilerin eğitim hayatı (Anılar bağlamında nitel bir analiz). Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi - Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(1), 253-275. https://doi.10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.6c1s11m
  46. Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: a prospective study. Journal Of Personality, 60(3), 599-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 6494.1992.tb00922.x
  47. Voight, A., Hanson, T., O’Malley, M., & Adekanye, L. (2015). The racial school climate gap: Within‐ school disparities in students’ experiences of safety, support, and connectedness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56(3-4), 252-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-015-9751-x
  48. Von Sommoggy, J., Rueter, J., Curbach, J., Helten, J., Tittlbach, S., & Loss, J. (2020). How does the campus environment ınfluence everyday physical activity? A photovoice study among students of two German universities. Front. Public Health, 8, 1-11. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpubh.2020.561175
  49. Wang, C. & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education and Behavior, 24(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309
  50. Wasserburg, G. J. (2002). 21. Yüzyılda bilim insanı yetiştirme üzerine öneriler. Ankara: TÜBA Xu, H. (2011). Students’ perceptions of university education—USA and China. Research in Higher Education Journal, 10(1), 1-10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267823537_Students'perceptions_of_university_ education-USA_vs_China
  51. Wertheimer, M., & Riezler, K. (1944). Gestalt theory. Social Research, 11(1), 78-99. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40982002
  52. Yaşlı, E., & Yıldız Demirtaş, V. (2023). Özel gereksinimi olan öğrenciler ile tipik gelişim gösteren öğrencilerin okul kavramına yönelik algıları. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 58, 2948-2968. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1338536
  53. Yılmazlı Trout, İ., & Yıldırım, F. (2021). Lisansüstü öğrencilerinin gözünden kampüs ortamı: Bir photovoice (fotoses) çalışması. Nitel Sosyal Bilimler, 3(2), 231-257. https://doi.org/10.47105/nsb.937091
  54. Yiğit, B., & Bayrakdar, M. (2006). Okul-çevre ilişkileri. Ankara: Pegem.
  55. Yüner, B., & Özdemir, M. (2017). Metaforik okul algısı ile okulu terk eğilimi arasındaki ilişkinin öğrenci görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(3), 1041- 1060. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.303842