Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Supplementary abbreviated supine breast MRI following a standard prone breast MRI with single contrast administration: is it effective in detecting the initial contrast-enhancing lesions?

Pages
265–269
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION An abbreviated supine sequence following a standard prone DCE-MRI with single contrast media administration is an effective method for defining the lesion location in supine position.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the detectability of contrast enhancing lesions, initially demonstrated in standard prone dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), in a supplementary supine breast MRI examination performed following the standard prone DCE-MRI examination and to show the correlation of spatial displacement of the lesions with breast size and density.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS Forty-two patients with 45 lesions were prospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION An abbreviated supine sequence following a standard prone DCE-MRI with single contrast media administration is an effective method for defining the lesion location in supine position.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the detectability of contrast enhancing lesions, initially demonstrated in standard prone dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), in a supplementary supine breast MRI examination performed following the standard prone DCE-MRI examination and to show the correlation of spatial displacement of the lesions with breast size and density. METHODS Forty-two patients with 45 lesions were prospectively evaluated. Supine breast MRI was acquired with a 6-channel body coil following a standard DCE-MRI in prone position after repositioning the patient. No additional contrast media was administered. Images were evaluated by two radiologists in consensus for the visibility of the lesions. Lesion localization relative to the sternal midline, chest wall and nipple was measured in both prone and supine positions. Correlations between lesion displacement and breast size or breast density were analyzed. RESULTS Of 45 lesions, 23 (52.3%) were masses, 22 (47.7%) were nonmass enhancements (NME). Forty-four lesions (97.8%) could be detected on supine images. One linear NME of 33 mm in length could not be seen on supine images. Twenty (46.5%) of the detected lesions in supine position were equal to or smaller than 10 mm (11 NME [55%] and 9 masses [45%]). Lesion displacement relative to the chest wall increased with increasing breast size (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION An abbreviated supine sequence following a standard prone DCE-MRI with single contrast media administration is an effective method for defining the lesion location in supine position.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARIBAL, E., BUĞDAYCI, O. (2019). Supplementary abbreviated supine breast MRI following a standard prone breast MRI with single contrast administration: is it effective in detecting the initial contrast-enhancing lesions?. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 265–269. https://ajindex.com/articles/150931

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Morris EA. Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions. Radiol Clin North Am 2007
  2. 863–880. [CrossRef] 2. Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, et al. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2008
  3. 671–679. [CrossRef] 3. Aribal E, Asadov R, Ramazan A, et al. Multiparametric breast MRI with 3T: Effectivity of combination of contrast enhanced MRI, DWI and 1H single voxel spectroscopy in differentiation of Breast tumors. Eur J Radiol 2016
  4. 979–986. [CrossRef] 4. Rahbar H, Partridge SC. Multiparametric MR imaging of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2016
  5. 223–238. [CrossRef] 5. Kuhl CK, Strobel K, Bieling H, et al. Supplemental Breast MR Imaging Screening of Women with Average Risk of Breast Cancer. Radiology 2017
  6. 361–370. [CrossRef] 6. Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, et al. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European society of breast imaging. Eur Radiol 2008
  7. 1307–1318. [CrossRef] 7. Carbonaro LA, Tannaphai P, Trimboli RM, et al. Contrast enhanced breast MRI: spatial displacement from prone to supine patient's position. Preliminary results. Eur J Radiol 2012
  8. e771–e774. [CrossRef] 8. Satake H, Ishigaki S, Kitano M, et al. Prediction of prone-to-supine tumor displacement in the breast using patient position change: investigation with prone MRI and supine CT. Breast Cancer 2016
  9. 149–158. [CrossRef] 9. Fausto A, Rizzatto G, Preziosa A, et al. A new method to combine contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging during live ultrasound of the breast using volume navigation technique: a study for evaluating feasibility, accuracy and reproducibility in healthy volunteers. Eur J Radiol 2012
  10. e332–e337. [CrossRef] 10. Nakano S, Kousaka J, Fujii K, et al. Impact of real-time virtual sonography, a coordinated sonography and MRI system that uses an image fusion technique, on the sonographic evaluation of MRI-detected lesions of the breast in second-look sonography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012
  11. 1179–1188. [CrossRef] 11. Kucukkaya F, Aribal E, Tureli D, et al. Use of a volume navigation technique for combining real-time ultrasound and contrast-enhanced MRI: accuracy and feasibility of a novel technique for locating breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015
  12. 217–225. [CrossRef] 12. Morris EA, Comstock CE, Lee CH. ACR BI-RADS® Magnetic Resonance Imaging. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American Col