Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2025 / Volume: 8 Issue: 6

Evaluation of clinical and laboratory findings in cases of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis

İnfantil hipertrofik pilor stenozu olgularının klinik ve laboratuar bulgularının incelenmesi

Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-10-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our study provides valuable insights into the risk factors and clinical characteristics of IHPS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) is the most common gastrointestinal disorder in early infancy that requires surgical intervention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 19 cases of IHPS diagnosed from 2012 to 2024 at the Department of Pediatrics, Düzce University Research and Training Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our study provides valuable insights into the risk factors and clinical characteristics of IHPS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis · metabolic alkalosis · olive sign

Abstract

Aims: Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) is the most common gastrointestinal disorder in early infancy that requires surgical intervention. Although its etiology is not fully understood, several risk factors have been identified, including male sex, bottle feeding, and being a first-born child. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and laboratory findings of patients with IHPS and to contribute to the existing literature. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 19 cases of IHPS diagnosed from 2012 to 2024 at the Department of Pediatrics, Düzce University Research and Training Hospital. Demographic characteristics, presenting complaints, laboratory results, and birth histories of the patients were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and correlation analyses were performed using SPSS version 25. Results: Of the patients, 78.9% were male, with a median age at diagnosis of 42 days. Bottle feeding was observed in 47.4% of cases, and 47.4% were first-born children. Vomiting was present in all patients, while 68.4% had complaints of poor weight gain. The rate of hypochloremia was 42.1%. A moderate negative correlation was found between maternal age and the duration of symptoms. Conclusion: Early recognition is crucial in the diagnosis and management of IHPS. Training healthcare professionals on this condition may improve early diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Our study provides valuable insights into the risk factors and clinical characteristics of IHPS.

Özet

Giriş: İnfantil hipertrofik pilor stenozu (İHPS), bebeklerde yaşamın erken döneminde cerrahi müdahale gerektiren en sık gastrointestinal hastalıktır. Etyolojisi tam olarak bilinmemekle birlikte erkek cinsiyet, biberonla beslenme ve ilk çocuk olma gibi risk faktörleri tanımlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada, İHPS’li hastaların klinik ve laboratuvar bulgularını değerlendirmek ve literatüre katkıda bulunmak amaçlanmıştır. Metodoloji: 2012-2024 yılları arasında Düzce Üniversitesi Araştırma ve Uygulama Hastanesi, çocuk sağlığı ve hastalıkları kliniklerinde İHPS tanısı alan 19 olgu retrospektif olarak incelenmiştir. Olguların demografik özellikleri, başvuru şikayetleri, laboratuvar sonuçları ve doğum öyküleri analiz edilmiştir. Tanımlayıcı istatistikler ve korelasyon analizleri SPSS 25 programı kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar: Olguların %78,9’u erkekti, median tanı yaşı 42 gündü. Olguların %47,4’ü biberonla besleniyordu ve %47,4’ü ilk çocuktu. Kusma tüm hastalarda görülürken, %68,4’ünde kilo alamama şikayeti vardı. Hipokloremi oranı %42,1 olarak saptandı. Anne yaşı ile semptom süresi arasında orta düzeyde negatif korelasyon bulundu. Sonuç: İHPS tanı ve tedavisinde erken farkındalık hayati öneme sahiptir. Sağlık çalışanlarının bu konuda eğitilmesi, erken tanı ve tedavi başarısını artıracaktır. Çalışmamız, İHPS’nin risk faktörleri ve klinik özelliklerine dair değerli bilgiler sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kurt, F., Kaya, M. (2025). Evaluation of clinical and laboratory findings in cases of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 8 Issue: 6. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1773064

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Zampieri N, Corato V, Scirè G, Camoglio FS. Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: 10 years’ experience with standard open and laparoscopic approach. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2021;24(3):265-272. doi:10.5223/pghn.2021.24.3.265
  2. Sakharkar S, Tiwari D, Yemul R, Kabra N. The enigma of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in preterm neonate. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2025:99228251342391. doi:10.1177/00099228251342391
  3. van den Bunder FA, Derikx JP, Kiblawi R, van Rijn RR, Dingemann J. Diagnostic accuracy of palpation and ultrasonography for diagnosing infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol. 2022;95(1139):20211251. doi:10.1259/bjr.20211251
  4. Oetzmann von Sochaczewski C, Muensterer OJ. The incidence of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis nearly halved from 2005 to 2017: analysis of German administrative data. Pediatr Surg Int. 2021;37(5):579-585. doi:10.1007/s00383-020-04810-0
  5. Obaid YY, Toubasi AA, Albustanji FH, Al-Qawasmeh AR. Perinatal risk factors for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2023;58(3):458-466. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.08.016
  6. Hernanz-Schulman M. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Radiology. 2003;227(2):319-331. doi:10.1148/radiol.2272011329
  7. Muse AI, Hussein BO, Adem BM, Osman MO, Abdulahi ZB, Ibrahim MA. Treatment outcome and associated factors of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis at eastern Ethiopia public hospitals. BMC Surg. 2024;24(1):262. doi:10.1186/s12893-024-02567-0
  8. Kozak M. What is strong correlation? Teaching Statistics. 2009;31(3):85-86. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9639.2009.00387.x
  9. Chuang YH, Chao HC, Yeh HY, Lai MW, Chen CC. Factors associated with pyloric hypertrophy severity and post-operative feeding and nutritional recovery in infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Biomed J. 2022;45(6):948-956. doi:10.1016/j.bj.2021.12.011
  10. Acker SN, Garcia AJ, Ross JT, Somme S. Current trends in the diagnosis and treatment of pyloric stenosis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015;31(4):363-366. doi:10.1007/s00383-015-3682-3
  11. Fawkner-Corbett D, McHoney M. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Paediatr Child Health. 2024;34(4):126-129. doi:10.1016/j.paed.2024.01.004
  12. Taylor ND, Cass DT, Holland AJ. Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: has anything changed? J Paediatr Child Health. 2013;49(1):33-37. doi:10.1111/jpc.12027
  13. Bundak R, Neyzi O, Günöz H, Darendeliler F. Pediatri Cilt 1. 3. Baskı. Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2002. Büyüme-gelişme ve bozuklukları; 79-99.
  14. Kaya B, Akduman H, Dilli D, et al. Pyloric Index, a new parameter: predicting perioperative prognosis in neonates with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2024;59(12):1272-1276. doi:10.1080/00365521.2024.2425982
  15. Zhu J, Zhu T, Lin Z, Qu Y, Mu D. Perinatal risk factors for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52(9):1389-1397. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.02.017
  16. Krogh C, Biggar RJ, Fischer TK, et al. Bottle-feeding and the risk of pyloric stenosis. Pediatrics. 2012;130(4):e943-e949. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2785
  17. Gotley LM, Blanch A, Kimble R, Frawley K, Acworth JP. Pyloric stenosis: a retrospective study of an Australian population. Emerg Med Australas. 2009;21(5):407-13. doi:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2009.01218.x
  18. Feng Z, Nie Y, Zhang Y, et al. The clinical features of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in Chinese Han population: analysis from 1998 to 2010. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88925. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088925
  19. Broom BL. Impact of marital quality and psychological well-being on parental sensitivity. Nurs Res. 1994;43(3):138-143. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088925