Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Hidden bridges of the cranium: anatomical foundations of clinical challenges

Pınar Öztürk(Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Yenimahalle Education and Research Hospital, Neurology Clinic)0000-0002-9422-5723
Buket Oğuz(Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Anatomi Anabilim Dalı)0000-0002-5983-1875
Sinem Akkaşoğlu Taş(Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Anatomi Anabilim Dalı)0000-0002-3371-4734
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A thorough understanding of the incidence and clinical implications of cranial bony bridges, as demonstrated in our laboratory observations and supported by the existing literature, is therefore critical for optimizing diagnostic accuracy and ensuring safe and effective surgical management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency, laterality, morphology, and coexistence of clinically relevant cranial bony bridges (interclinoid bridge, caroticoclinoid bridge, pterygospinous bridge and pterygoalar bridge ) in dry human skulls.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Examination of 40 skulls identified infrequent sphenoidal bony bridges: one specimen showed bilateral complete caroticoclinoid foramina concomitant with bilateral interclinoid foramina, without spicular components.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A thorough understanding of the incidence and clinical implications of cranial bony bridges, as demonstrated in our laboratory observations and supported by the existing literature, is therefore critical for optimizing diagnostic accuracy and ensuring safe and effective surgical management.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sella turcica bridge · sphenoid spine bridge · pterygospinous bridge

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency, laterality, morphology, and coexistence of clinically relevant cranial bony bridges (interclinoid bridge, caroticoclinoid bridge, pterygospinous bridge and pterygoalar bridge ) in dry human skulls. Methods: Forty adult dry human skulls of unknown age and sex were examined. Only specimens allowing visualization of the sphenoid bone were included. The presence and morphology of the caroticoclinoid foramen (CCF), interclinoid foramen (ICF), pterygospinous bridge, and pterygoalar bridge were assessed. Variants were classified according to completeness, laterality, and associated spicules, and all findings were documented photographically. Results: Examination of 40 skulls identified infrequent sphenoidal bony bridges: one specimen showed bilateral complete caroticoclinoid foramina concomitant with bilateral interclinoid foramina, without spicular components. Unilateral pterygospinous bridging occurred in two skulls on opposite sides, whereas pterygoalar bridges were not observed. Conclusion: Cranial bony bridges represent clinically relevant anatomical variants that warrant careful consideration during diagnostic evaluation, particularly in patients presenting with atypical or unexplained neurological symptoms. Recognition of these variations is essential for preoperative planning, as their presence may increase the risk of neurovascular injury and intraoperative complications. A thorough understanding of the incidence and clinical implications of cranial bony bridges, as demonstrated in our laboratory observations and supported by the existing literature, is therefore critical for optimizing diagnostic accuracy and ensuring safe and effective surgical management.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öztürk, P., Oğuz, B., Taş, S. A. (2026). Hidden bridges of the cranium: anatomical foundations of clinical challenges. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1860844

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Das S, Suri R, Kapur V. Ossification of caroticoclinoid ligament and its clinical importance in skull-based surgery. Sao Paulo Med J. 2007;125(6): 351-353. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802007000600009
  2. Priya A, Narayan RK, Ghosh SK, Kumar PJ. Morphometry and morphological analysis of carotico-clinoid foramen: an anatomical study with clinical implications. Folia Morphologica. 2023;82(1):108-118. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2021.0128
  3. Bansode SA, Devadas P, Vinila BHS. Study on the ıncidence of the carotico-clinoid foramen in the South Indian dry adult skulls: a cross-sectional study. Int J Anat Res. 2017;5(3.1):4051-4055. doi:10.16965/ijar. 2017.247
  4. Tayebi Meybodi A, Mignucci-Jiménez G, Lawton MT, Liu JK, Preul MC, Sun H. Comprehensive microsurgical anatomy of the middle cranial fossa: part I-osseous and meningeal anatomy. Front Surg. 2023;10: 1132774. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1132774
  5. Cederberg RA, Benson BW, Nunn M, English JD. Calcification of the interclinoid and petroclinoid ligaments of sella turcica: a radiographic study of the prevalence. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2003;6(4):227-232. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2003.00243.x
  6. Fernandez-Miranda JC, Tormenti M, Latorre F, Gardner P, Snyderman C. Endoscopic endonasal middle clinoidectomy: anatomic, radiological, and technical note. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2 Suppl Operative):ons 233-239. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182690b6b
  7. Muthukumar V, Nanjundaiah K, Shetty S. Study of carotico clinoid foramen in dry human skulls. Int J Anat Res. 2017;5(4.2):4630-4634. doi: 10.16965/ijar.2017.425
  8. Ryu SJ, Park MK, Lee UY, Kwak HH. Incidence of pterygospinous and pterygoalar bridges in dried skulls of Koreans. Anat Cell Biol. 2016;49(2): 143-150. doi: 10.5115/acb.2016.49.2.143
  9. Erturk M, Kayalioglu G, Govsa F. Anatomy of the clinoidal region with special emphasis on the caroticoclinoid foramen and interclinoid osseous bridge in a recent Turkish population. Neurosurg Rev. 2004; 27(1):22-26. doi: 10.1007/s10143-003-0265-x
  10. Boyan N, Özşahin E, Kizilkanat E, Tekdemir İ, Soames R, Oguz O. Surgical ımportance of the morphometry of the anterior clinoid process, optic strut, caroticoclinoid foramen, and ınterclinoid osseous bridge. Neurosurgery Quarterly. 2011;21(2):133-136. doi:10.1097/WNQ. 0B013E31820F1929
  11. Freire AR, Rossi AC, Prado FB, Groppo FC, Caria PHF, Botacin PR. Caroticoclinoid foramen in human skulls: ıncidence, morphometry and its clinical ımplications. Int J Morphol. 2011;29(2):427-431. doi:10.4067/S0717-95022011000200021
  12. Gibelli D, Cellina M, Gibelli S, et al. Sella turcica bridging and ossified carotico-clinoid ligament: correlation with sex and age. Neuroradiol J. 2018;31(3):299-304. doi:10.1177/1971400917751036
  13. Lepp FH, Sandner O. Anatomic-radiographic study of ossified pterygospinous and "innominate" ligaments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1968;26(2):244-260. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(68)90262-4
  14. Kapur E, Dilberović F, Redzepagić S, Berhamović E. Variation in the lateral plate of the pterygoid process and the lateral subzygomatic approach to the mandibular nerve. Med Arh. 2000;54(3):133-137.
  15. Peker T, Karaköse M, Anil A, Turgut HB, Gülekon N. The incidence of basal sphenoid bony bridges in dried crania and cadavers: their anthropological and clinical relevance. Eur J Morphol. 2002;40(3):171-180. doi: 10.1076/ejom.40.3.171.16686