SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

3D-printed zirconia in dentistry: a bibliometric analysis of global research trends

Mesut Tuzlalı(Inonu University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics)0000-0002-7602-8101
Nagehan Baki(INONU UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY, DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY THERAPY)0000-0002-3221-4543
Nazik İrem Önügören(INONU UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY, DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY THERAPY)0000-0002-5770-9163
İrem Sarkaya(INONU UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY, DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY THERAPY)0009-0005-0460-4834
Esma Başak Gül Aygün(CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY, DEPARTMENT OF CLINICAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY THERAPY, PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY)0000-0002-9475-4035
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Future studies should prioritize clinical investigations and standardized reporting of printing and post-processing parameters to support translation into predictable outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Three-dimensional (3D) printing of zirconia is an emerging domain in digital dentistry; however, its global research landscape, collaboration structure, and thematic focus have not been comprehensively mapped.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to characterize scientific output, collaboration patterns, citation impact, and major research themes in publications on 3D-printed zirconia in dentistry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Future studies should prioritize clinical investigations and standardized reporting of printing and post-processing parameters to support translation into predictable outcomes.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Zirconium oxide (zirconia) · 3D-printed · bibliometrics

Abstract

Aims: Three-dimensional (3D) printing of zirconia is an emerging domain in digital dentistry; however, its global research landscape, collaboration structure, and thematic focus have not been comprehensively mapped. The aim of this study was to characterize scientific output, collaboration patterns, citation impact, and major research themes in publications on 3D-printed zirconia in dentistry. Methods: A Web of Science Core Collection (WoS-CC) Topic Search was conducted in December 2025 using terms related to zirconia, additive manufacturing/3D printing, and dental applications. Of 584 retrieved records, 185 eligible articles on 3D-printed zirconia for dental use (2009–2025) were included. Descriptive indicators were calculated (annual production, journals, countries, institutions, authors, and citations). Co-authorship and keyword co-occurrence networks were generated with VOSviewer to visualize collaboration and identify thematic clusters. Results: Publication activity increased sharply after 2019, with 128/185 publications (69.2%) published in 2023–2025. Most documents were original research articles (n=159) or reviews (n=26); no case reports were identified in WoS-CC. The 185 articles involved 730 authors from 38 countries and were published in 48 journals. China and the United States were leading contributors. Network analyses identified three interconnected themes: digital/additive manufacturing workflows, implantprosthodontic applications, and biomechanical or accuracy-based evaluation. Evidence was predominantly in vitro and laboratory-based, with limited clinical data. Conclusion: Research on 3D-printed zirconia in dentistry is rapidly expanding but concentrated in a small set of countries, institutions, and journals. Future studies should prioritize clinical investigations and standardized reporting of printing and post-processing parameters to support translation into predictable outcomes.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tuzlalı, M., Baki, N., Önügören, N. İ., Sarkaya, İ., Aygün, E. B. G. (2026). 3D-printed zirconia in dentistry: a bibliometric analysis of global research trends. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1847310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Huang B, Chen M, Wang J, Zhang X. Advances in zirconia-based dental materials: properties, classification, applications, and future prospects. J Dent. 2024;147:105111. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105111
  2. Branco AC, Colaço R, Figueiredo-Pina CG, Serro AP. Recent advances on 3D-printed zirconia-based dental materials: a review. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(5):1860. doi:10.3390/ma16051860
  3. Khanlar LN, Salazar Rios A, Tahmaseb A, Zandinejad A. Additive manufacturing of zirconia ceramic and its application in clinical dentistry: a review. Dent J (Basel). 2021;9(9):104. doi:10.3390/dj9090104
  4. Tian Y, Chen C, Xu X, et al. A review of 3D printing in dentistry: technologies, affecting factors, and applications. Scanning. 2021;2021: 9950131. doi:10.1155/2021/9950131
  5. Altıntaş E, Tartuk BK, Tartuk GA. 3D printing technology applied to dentistry: a review. Bingöl Üniv Sağlık Derg. 2025;6(2):250-265. doi:10. 58605/bingolsaglik.1694419
  6. Chen Y, Wei J. Application of 3D printing technology in dentistry: a review. Polymers (Basel). 2025;17(7):886. doi:10.3390/polym17070886
  7. Ebrahimi M, Shaikh H, Sichani HR, et al. Additive manufacturing for dentistry: a comprehensive review of techniques and applications. Prog Mater Sci. 2025:101613. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.101613
  8. Nakai H, Inokoshi M, Nozaki K, et al. Additively manufactured zirconia for dental applications. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(13):3694. doi:10.3390/ma14133694
  9. Gatto ML, Groppo R, Furlani M, Giuliani A, Mangano C, Mangano F. Lithography-based ceramic manufacturing (LCM) versus milled zirconia blocks under uniaxial compressive loading: an in vitro comparative study. J Dent. 2022;116:103886. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2021. 103886
  10. Su G, Zhang Y, Jin C, et al. 3D printed zirconia used as dental materials: a critical review. J Biol Eng. 2023;17(1):78. doi:10.1186/s13036-023-00396-y
  11. Yoo LG, Pang NS, Kim SH, Jung BY. Mechanical properties of additively manufactured zirconia with alumina air abrasion surface treatment. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):9153. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-36181-6
  12. Frąckiewicz W, Szymlet P, Jedliński M, Światłowska-Bajzert M, Sobolewska E. Mechanical characteristics of zirconia produced additively by 3D printing in dentistry-a systematic review with meta-analysis of novel reports. Dent Mater. 2024;40(1):124-138. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.020
  13. Wang Y, Zhou Y, Zhu H, Jiang J, He F. Accuracy, fit, and marginal quality of advanced additively manufactured and milled zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(1):208.e1-208.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.09.016
  14. Floriani F, Henprasert P, Cho SH, Zandinejad A. Evaluating dimensional accuracy of additively manufactured zirconia and the impact of porosity variations: part 2. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;134(1):228.e1-228.e6. doi:10. 1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.026
  15. Alghauli M, Alqutaibi AY, Wille S, Kern M. 3D-printed versus conventionally milled zirconia for dental clinical applications: trueness, precision, accuracy, biological and esthetic aspects. J Dent. 2024;144: 104925. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104925
  16. Mosaddad SA, Peláez J, Panadero RA, Ghodsi S, Akhlaghian M, Suárez MJ. Do 3D printed and milled tooth-supported complete monolithic zirconia crowns differ in accuracy and fit? A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2025;133(2):383-393. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.010
  17. Baysal N, Tuğba Kalyoncuoğlu Ü, Ayyıldız S. Mechanical properties and bond strength of additively manufactured and milled dental zirconia: a pilot study. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(7):629-634. doi:10.1111/jopr.13472
  18. Karabulut-Açıkgöz T, Takva Ş, Canay Ş. 3D-printed zirconia restorations. Cumhuriyet Dent J. 2025;28(3):447-451. doi:10.7126/cumudj.1648247
  19. Lin WS, Chen L, Alfaraj A. 3D-printed zirconia and lithium disilicate in dentistry and their clinical applications. Int J Prosthodont. 2025;38(1):12-26. doi:10.11607/ijp.8831
  20. Han M-K. Advances and challenges in zirconia-based materials for dental applications. J Korean Ceramic Soci. 2024;61(5):783-799. doi:10. 1007/s43207-024-00416-7
  21. Teles A, Dos Anjos LM, Dallepiane FG, et al. What are the research trends on the use of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in dentistry? A bibliometric analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.11.013
  22. de Oliveira Rocha A, Dos Anjos LM, Freire-Maia J, Henriques B, Cardoso M, Martins Júnior PA. Analysis of the profile of metric-based reviews published in dentistry and proposal for a standardized guideline: metrics. Odontology. 2025. doi:10.1007/s10266-025-01208-z
  23. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr. 2017;11(4):959-975. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  24. Zhu H, Zhou Y, Jiang J, Wang Y, He F. Accuracy and margin quality of advanced 3D printed monolithic zirconia crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 2025; 133(5):1284-1292. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.07.004
  25. Abualsaud R, Alalawi H. Fit, precision, and trueness of 3D-printed zirconia crowns compared to milled counterparts. Dent J (Basel). 2022; 10(11):215. doi:10.3390/dj10110215