Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Body composition, hormonal and metabolic profiles in polycystic ovary syndrome with and without insulin resistance

Belma Özlem Tural Balsak(Ankara Bilkent City Hospital)0000-0002-1348-7706
Hikmet Soylu(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, DİYARBAKIR GAZİ YAŞARGİL HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0003-4118-366X
Mehmet Güven(UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, DİYARBAKIR GAZİ YAŞARGİL HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER)0000-0002-0752-8815
Zafer Pekkolay(DICLE UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0000-0002-5323-2257
Fatih Mehmet Fındık(DICLE UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0000-0001-9142-6127
Alparslan Kemal Tuzcu(DICLE UNIVERSITY, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE)0000-0002-1814-9773
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Assessment of body composition, including fat mass, may provide a more sensitive tool than BMI alone for identifying metabolic risk in PCOS.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: This study aimed to compare body compositions, as assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), hormonal parameters, and metabolic profiles of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) according to their IR status.
📊
Key Findings & Data:IR was assessed in 86 patients and defined as HOMA-IR >2.5.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Assessment of body composition, including fat mass, may provide a more sensitive tool than BMI alone for identifying metabolic risk in PCOS.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bioimpedance · PCOS

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to compare body compositions, as assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), hormonal parameters, and metabolic profiles of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) according to their IR status. Methods: Ninety-four women diagnosed with PCOS according to the Rotterdam criteria were included. IR was assessed in 86 patients and defined as HOMA-IR >2.5. Participants were classified as insulin-resistant (IR+) or insulin-sensitive (IR–). Anthropometric measurements, body composition parameters, oral glucose tolerance test results, lipid profiles, and hormonal parameters were compared. Results: IR was present in 51 patients, while 35 were IR–. Compared with the IR–, IR+ patients had significantly higher body weight, BMI, waist and hip circumferences, body fat percentage, fat mass, fat-free mass, muscle mass, bone mass, total body water, basal metabolic rate, metabolic age, and visceral fat ratio (p<0.0001). In contrast, total body water percentage was significantly lower in the IR+ group (p<0.001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, fat mass emerged as the only independent predictor of insulin resistance (OR=1.115, 95% CI: 1.053–1.180, p<0.001), whereas BMI was not significant. Insulin resistance prevalence did not differ significantly across Rotterdam PCOS phenotypes. IR+ patients also exhibited higher fasting and 120-minute glucose and insulin levels during oral glucose tolerance testing, higher triglyceride and VLDL levels, and lower HDL levels (p<0.05). No significant differences were observed between groups in total testosterone, DHEAS levels, or Ferriman–Gallwey scores. Conclusion: Although IR can be observed in both lean and obese women with PCOS, obesity appears to aggravate the metabolic severity of the disease. Hyperandrogenism may be more severe in IR+ women but is also present in IR– patients, indicating that androgen excess in PCOS cannot be explained solely by IR. Assessment of body composition, including fat mass, may provide a more sensitive tool than BMI alone for identifying metabolic risk in PCOS.

🔖

Cite This Article

Balsak, B. Ö. T., Soylu, H., Güven, M., Pekkolay, Z., Fındık, F. M., Tuzcu, A. K. (2026). Body composition, hormonal and metabolic profiles in polycystic ovary syndrome with and without insulin resistance. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1850275

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Bozdag G, Mumusoglu S, Zengin D, et al. The prevalence and phenotypic features of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(12):2841-2855. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew218
  2. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2004;19(1):41-47. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh098
  3. Majumdar A, Singh TA. Comparison of clinical features and health manifestations in lean vs obese Indian women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2009;2(1):12-17. doi:10.4103/0974-1208.51336
  4. Carmina E, Lobo RA. Comparing lean and obese PCOS in different PCOS phenotypes: evidence that the body weight is more important than the Rotterdam phenotype in influencing the metabolic status. Diagnostics. 2022;12(10):2313. doi:10.3390/diagnostics12102313
  5. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412-419. doi:10.1007/BF00280883
  6. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606-613. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
  7. Legro RS. Diabetes prevalence and risk factors in polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2001;28(1):99-109. doi:10. 1016/S0889-8545(05)70188-1
  8. Evans DJ, Hoffmann RG, Kalkhoff RK, Kissebah AH. Relationship of androgenic activity to body fat topography, fat cell morphology, and metabolic aberrations in premenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;57(2):304-310. doi:10.1210/jcem-57-2-304
  9. Lovejoy JC, Bray GA, Bourgeois MO, et al. Exogenous androgens influence body composition and regional body fat distribution in obese postmenopausal women: a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(6):2198-2203. doi:10.1210/jcem.81.6.8964851
  10. Bagatell CJ, Bremner WJ. Androgens in men: uses and abuses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(11):707-714. doi:10.1056/NEJM199603143341107
  11. Zhang H, Wang W, Zhao J, et al. Relationship between body composition, insulin resistance, and hormonal profiles in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023;13:1085656. doi:10. 3389/fendo.2022.1085656
  12. Legro RS, Kunselman AR, Dodson WC, Dunaif A. Prevalence and predictors of risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective, controlled study in 254 affected women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(1):165-169. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.1.5393
  13. Ehrmann DA, Barnes RB, Rosenfield RL, Cavaghan MK, Imperial J. Prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(1):141-146. doi:10. 2337/diacare.22.1.141
  14. Ehrmann DA, Kasza K, Azziz R, Legro RS, Ghazzi MN, PCOS/Troglitazone Study Group. Effects of race and family history of type 2 diabetes on metabolic status of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(1):66-71. doi:10.1210/jc.2004-0229
  15. Rizza RA. Pathogenesis of fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: implications for therapy. Diabetes. 2010;59(11):2697-2707. doi:10.2337/db10-1032
  16. Salley KE, Wickham EP, Cheang KI, Essah PA, Karjane NW, Nestler JE. Glucose intolerance in polycystic ovary syndrome: a position statement of the Androgen Excess Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(12): 4546-4556. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-1549
  17. Velling Magnussen L, Mumm H, Andersen M, Glintborg D. Hemoglobin A1c as a tool for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in 208 premenopausal women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(5):1275-1280. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.035
  18. Wild RA, Rizzo M, Clifton S, Carmina E. Lipid levels in polycystic ovary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3): 1073-1081.e11. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.12.027
  19. Teede HJ, Mousa A, Tay CT, et al. Summary of the 2023 international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: an Australian perspective. Med J Aust. 2024;221(7):389-395. doi:10.5694/mja2.52432
  20. Newman CB, Blaha MJ, Boord JB, et al. Lipid management in patients with endocrine disorders: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(12):dgaa674. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa674
  21. Kruszynska YT, Worrall DS, Ofrecio J, Frias JP, Macaraeg G, Olefsky JM. Fatty acid-induced insulin resistance: decreased muscle PI3K activation but unchanged Akt phosphorylation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(1):226-234. doi:10.1210/jcem.87.1.8187
  22. Rosenfield RL, Ehrmann DA. The pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the hypothesis of PCOS as functional ovarian hyperandrogenism revisited. Endocr Rev. 2016;37(5):467-520. doi:10. 1210/er.2015-1104
  23. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dunaif A. Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome revisited: an update on mechanisms and implications. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(6):981-1030. doi:10.1210/er.2011-1034