Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 2

Correlation of ACR TI-RADS ultrasound classification with cytopathology: a retrospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy

Şeref Barbaros Arık(YÜKSEK İHTİSAS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6030-977X
Pınar Atabey(YÜKSEK İHTİSAS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2055-8437
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Using TI-RADS ≥4 as the threshold, sensitivity was 78.8%, specificity 61.0%, PPV 11.1%, and NPV 97.9%, with an overall accuracy of 62.1% and an AUC of 0.75 (p<0.001).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) in predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules and to assess the correlation between TI-RADS categories, cytopathological outcomes, and guideline-recommended biopsy thresholds.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 567 thyroid nodules evaluated with ultrasound and Doppler imaging between January 2023 and November 2025.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Using TI-RADS ≥4 as the threshold, sensitivity was 78.8%, specificity 61.0%, PPV 11.1%, and NPV 97.9%, with an overall accuracy of 62.1% and an AUC of 0.75 (p<0.001).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:ACR TI-RADS · thyroid nodule · ultrasonography

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) in predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules and to assess the correlation between TI-RADS categories, cytopathological outcomes, and guideline-recommended biopsy thresholds. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 567 thyroid nodules evaluated with ultrasound and Doppler imaging between January 2023 and November 2025. TI-RADS scores were retrospectively assigned according to ACR criteria based on sonographic features. Cytopathology served as the reference standard, with nodules classified as benign (Bethesda II) or malignant/suspicious for malignancy (Bethesda V–VI). Diagnostic performance metrics of TI-RADS ≥4 were calculated, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of malignancy. Results: Of the 567 nodules, 33 (5.8%) were malignant. Malignancy rates increased across TI-RADS categories, reaching 31.6% in TR5 nodules. Using TI-RADS ≥4 as the threshold, sensitivity was 78.8%, specificity 61.0%, PPV 11.1%, and NPV 97.9%, with an overall accuracy of 62.1% and an AUC of 0.75 (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that both TI-RADS score (OR=4.09 per category increase, p<0.001) and nodule size (OR=1.04 per mm, p=0.013) were independent predictors of malignancy. Nodules meeting guideline-based biopsy size criteria showed significantly higher malignancy odds. Conclusion: ACR TI-RADS provides reliable malignancy risk stratification with a high NPV in routine clinical practice. The system effectively reduces unnecessary biopsies while maintaining diagnostic safety, supporting its continued use as a standardized ultrasound-based risk stratification tool for thyroid nodules.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arık, Ş. B., Atabey, P. (2026). Correlation of ACR TI-RADS ultrasound classification with cytopathology: a retrospective evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1853967

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1-133. doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020
  2. Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Bray F, Wild CP, Plummer M, Dal Maso L. Worldwide thyroid-cancer epidemic? The increasing impact of overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(7):614-617. doi:10.1056/NEJMp 1604412
  3. Seo H, Na DG, Kim JH, Kim KW, Yoon JW. Ultrasound-based risk stratification for malignancy in thyroid nodules: a four-tier categorization system. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(7):2153-2162. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3621-7
  4. Na DG, Baek JH, Sung JY, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system risk stratification of thyroid nodules: categorization based on solidity and echogenicity. Thyroid. 2016;26(4):562-572. doi:10.1089/thy. 2015.0460
  5. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5):587-595. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.046
  6. Chen Q, Lin M, Wu S. Validating and comparing C-TIRADS, K-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS in stratifying the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:899575. doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.899575
  7. Hoang JK, Langer JE, Middleton WD, et al. Managing incidental thyroid nodules detected on imaging: white paper of the ACR Incidental Thyroid Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(2):143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.09.038
  8. Park JY, Lee HJ, Jang HW, et al. A proposal for a thyroid imaging reporting and data system for ultrasound features of thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1257-1264. doi:10.1089/thy.2008.0021
  9. Kwak JY, Han KH, Yoon JH, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features of nodules: a step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk. Radiology. 2011;260(3):892-899. doi:10.1148/radiol.11110206
  10. Ringel MD, Sosa JA, Baloch Z, et al. 2025 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for adult patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2025;35(8):841-985. doi:10.1177/10507256251363120
  11. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG. Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): a user's guide. Radiology. 2018;287(1):29-36. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017171240
  12. Frates MC, Benson CB, Charboneau JW, et al. Management of thyroid nodules detected at US: society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference statement. Radiology. 2005;237(3):794-800. doi:10.1148/radiol.2373050220