Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 3

Patient satisfaction and objective outcomes after Burch colposuspension for female stress urinary incontinence: no mesh

İnci Öz(Medicana Ataköy Hastanesi)0000-0001-9160-2733
Ali Utku Öz(Department of Gynaecology of Obstetrics, Beykoz Government Hospital)0009-0000-9908-5187
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-19
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, longer-term follow-up studies are required to confirm the durability of these outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: To evaluate clinical characteristics, objective and subjective outcomes, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications in women undergoing Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This retrospective observational study included 137 women who underwent Burch colposuspension between 2018 and 2022.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, longer-term follow-up studies are required to confirm the durability of these outcomes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Burch colposuspension · stress urinary incontinence · cough stress test

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate clinical characteristics, objective and subjective outcomes, patient satisfaction, and postoperative complications in women undergoing Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 137 women who underwent Burch colposuspension between 2018 and 2022. Objective outcomes were assessed using cough stress and pad tests preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. Subjective outcomes included a stress urinary incontinence severity score (0-5) and patient satisfaction measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Postoperative complications were recorded. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results: The mean age was 58.13±7.08 years and the mean body-mass index was 32.20±3.71 kg/m². At 6 months, 88.3% of patients demonstrated negative cough stress and pad test results. Symptom severity improved substantially, with 89.1% reporting a postoperative score of 0 compared to 43.8% reporting scores of 4-5 preoperatively. High patient satisfaction was observed, with 94.9% reporting scores of 4-5. Postoperative complications occurred in 9.5% of patients. Conclusion: Burch colposuspension provides high short-term success rates, significant symptom improvement, and excellent patient satisfaction with an acceptable complication profile. However, longer-term follow-up studies are required to confirm the durability of these outcomes.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öz, İ., Öz, A. U. (2026). Patient satisfaction and objective outcomes after Burch colposuspension for female stress urinary incontinence: no mesh. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1906810

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Kobashi KC, Albo ME, Dmochowski RR, et al. Surgical treatment of female stress urinary ıncontinence: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2017; 198(4):875-883. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.06.061
  2. Kobashi KC, Vasavada S, Bloschichak A, et al. Updates to surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI): AUA/SUFU guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023;209(6):1091-1098. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000 000003435
  3. Veit-Rubin N, Dubuisson J, Ford A, Dubuisson JB, Mourad S, Digesu A. Burch colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(2):553-562. doi:10. 1002/nau.23905
  4. NICE Guidance-Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management: © NICE (2019) Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management. BJU Int. 2019;123(5):777-803. doi:10.1111/bju.14763
  5. Zimmern P, Kobashi K, Lemack G. Outcome measure for stress urinary incontinence treatment (OMIT): results of two society of urodynamics and female urology (SUFU) surveys. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29(5):715-718. doi:10.1002/nau.20840
  6. Kjølhede P. Long-term efficacy of Burch colposuspension: a 14-year follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(8):767-772. doi:10. 1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00731.x
  7. Langer R, Lipshitz Y, Halperin R, Pansky M, Bukovsky I, Sherman D. Long-Term (10-15 years) follow-up after Burch colposuspension for urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12(5):323-326; discussion 326-327. doi:10.1007/s001920170034
  8. Alcalay M, Monga A, Stanton SL. Burch colposuspension: a 10-20 year follow up. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102(9):740-745. doi:10.1111/j.1471- 0528.1995.tb11434.x
  9. Lose G. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1998;168:29-33.
  10. Moehrer B, Carey M, Wilson D. Laparoscopic colposuspension: a systematic review. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110(3):230-235.
  11. Karmakar D, Dwyer PL, Murray C, Schierlitz L, Dykes N, Zilberlicht A. Long-term effectiveness and safety of open Burch colposuspension vs retropubic midurethral sling for stress urinary incontinence-results from a large comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(6):593.e1-593.e8. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.043
  12. Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(21):2143-2155. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa070416
  13. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Karram MM, Walters MD, Paraiso MFR. Randomised trial of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: long-term follow up. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;115(2):219-225; discussion 225. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01592.x
  14. El-Barky E, El-Shazly A, El-Wahab OA, Kehinde EO, Al-Hunayan A, Al-Awadi KA. Tension free vaginal tape versus Burch colposuspension for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005;37(2):277-281. doi:10.1007/s11255-004-6101-6
  15. Paraiso MFR, Walters MD, Karram MM, Barber MD. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(6):1249-1258. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000 146290.10472.b3
  16. Novara G, Artibani W, Barber MD, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2010;58(2):218-238. doi:10. 1016/j.eururo.2010.04.022
  17. Eriksen BC, Hagen B, Eik-Nes SH, Molne K, Mjølnerød OK, Romslo I. Long-term effectiveness of the Burch colposuspension in female urinary stress incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1990;69(1):45-50. doi:10.3109/00016349009021038
  18. Yilmaz TS, Kumtepe Y, Senocak GNC, Yilmaz EPT, Yapar A. Randomized Trial of Single-Incision Midurethral Sling and Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension: Postoperative Surgical Outcomes and Complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024;31(9):738-746. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.05.009