Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 3

AI-based determination of Kennedy classification and modification spaces on panoramic radiographs

Fatma Nur Ortataş(YOZGAT BOZOK UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7897-9958
Ayça Dolar(YOZGAT BOZOK UNIVERSITY)0009-0005-5556-2718
Süha Kuşçu(YOZGAT BOZOK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-0805-5888
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-19
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Unlike prior AI-based studies that address Kennedy classification only at the basic class level, the present study explicitly and systematically incorporates modification space determination, representing a more detailed and systematic approach toward automated prosthetic assessment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: The aim of this study is to automatically perform tooth segmentation, FDI (Fédération Dentaire Internationale) tooth numbering, and the Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based determination of Kennedy classification and its modifications using images obtained from panoramic dental radiographs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient and Intersection over Union metrics.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Unlike prior AI-based studies that address Kennedy classification only at the basic class level, the present study explicitly and systematically incorporates modification space determination, representing a more detailed and systematic approach toward automated prosthetic assessment.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Deep learning · prosthodontics · Kennedy classification

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to automatically perform tooth segmentation, FDI (Fédération Dentaire Internationale) tooth numbering, and the Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based determination of Kennedy classification and its modifications using images obtained from panoramic dental radiographs. The study aims to help clinical decision support processes in prosthetic dentistry. Methods: The U-Net architecture was used for pixel-level tooth segmentation on panoramic dental radiographs, and different pre-trained encoder backbones were compared. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient and Intersection over Union metrics. The outputs of the best-performing model were integrated with the FDI tooth numbering system to automatically determine Kennedy classification and modification areas. Results: The results were evaluated by two clinicians specialized in prosthetic dentistry. Findings the U-Net model with the ResNet34 encoder demonstrated higher and more balanced segmentation performance compared to the other architectures. Statistical analyses revealed that the ResNet34 model was significantly superior to the other encoder configurations used in the study (p<0.05). The FDI-based analysis of the segmentation outputs showed that Kennedy classification and its modifications could be automatically determined in accordance with clinical rules. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that Kennedy classification and its modifications can be automatically determined using AI-assisted analysis of panoramic dental radiographs and provides a robust framework for decision support systems in prosthetic dentistry. Unlike prior AI-based studies that address Kennedy classification only at the basic class level, the present study explicitly and systematically incorporates modification space determination, representing a more detailed and systematic approach toward automated prosthetic assessment.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kuşçu, A. İ., Ortataş, F. N., Dolar, A., Kuşçu, S. (2026). AI-based determination of Kennedy classification and modification spaces on panoramic radiographs. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1870007

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Mizuno Y, Gonda T, Takahashi T, Tomita A, Maeda Y. Root fracture of abutment teeth for partial removable dental prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(5):461-466. doi:10.11607/ijp.4327
  2. Takahashi T, Nozaki K, Gonda T, Ikebe K. A system for designing removable partial dentures using Artificial Intelligence. Part 1. Classification of partially edentulous arches using a convolutional neural network. J Prosthodont Res. 2021;65(1):115-118. doi:10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_354
  3. Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Vyas S, et al. Artificial intelligence applications in implant dentistry: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(2):293-300. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.05.008
  4. Najeeb M, Islam S. Artificial intelligence (AI) in restorative dentistry: current trends and future prospects. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):592. doi:10.1186/s12903-025-05989-1
  5. Ayhan B, Ayan E, Bayraktar Y. A novel deep learning-based perspective for tooth numbering and caries detection. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(3): 178. doi:10.1007/s00784-024-05566-w
  6. Bağ İ, Bilgir E, Bayrakdar İŞ, et al. An Artificial Intelligence study: automatic description of anatomic landmarks on panoramic radiographs in the pediatric population. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):764. doi:10. 1186/s12903-023-03532-8
  7. Bernauer SA, Zitzmann NU, Joda T. The use and performance of Artificial Intelligence in prosthodontics: a systematic review. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21(19):6628. doi:10.3390/s21196628
  8. Keiser-Nielsen S. Federation Dentaire Internationale. Two-digit system of designating teeth. Dent Pract (Ewell). 1971;3:4.
  9. Mallya SM, Lam EWN. White and Pharoah’s Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. 8th ed. Elsevier; 2018.
  10. Adnan A, Rizwan MT, Attaullah HM, Basheer S, Quasim MT. Deep architectural classification of dental pathologies using orthopantomogram imaging. Comput Mater Contin. 2025;85(3):5073-5091. doi:10.32604/cmc.2025.068797
  11. Humans In The Loop. Teeth segmentation on dental X-Ray images [dataset]. Kaggle. 2023. doi:10.34740/kaggle/dsv/5884500
  12. Yüksel İB, Güntekin N, Tuncdemir AR. Diş eksikliği olan hastaların Kennedy sınıflamasına göre insidansının değerlendirilmesi: bir retrospektif çalışma. NEU Dent J. 2023;5(1):19-24. doi:10.51122/neudentj.2023.54
  13. Kennedy E. Partial denture construction. Dent Items Interest. 1928;1:3-8.
  14. Applegate OC. Essentials of removable partial denture prosthesis. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders; 1954.
  15. Herath HMSS, Yasakethu SLP, Madusanka N, Yi M, Lee BI. Comparative analysis of deep learning architectures for macular hole segmentation in OCT images: a performance evaluation of U-Net variants. J Imaging. 2025;11(2):53. doi:10.3390/jimaging11020053
  16. Maqsood R, Abid F, Rasheed J, Osman O, Alsubai S. Optimal Res-UNET architecture with deep supervision for tumor segmentation. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025;12:1593016. doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1593016
  17. Polat Ö. Sadeleştirilmiş U-Net mimarisi ile beyin tümörü segmentasyonu. NOHU J Eng Sci. 2022;11(4):856-861. doi:10.28948/ngumuh
  18. Özçelik STA, Üzen H, Şengür A, Çelebi A. Derin öğrenme ile panoramik radyografi görüntülerinden diş segmentasyonu: UNet, FPN ve PSPNet karşılaştırması. NOHU J Eng Sci. 2024;13(4):1347-1354. doi:10.28948/ngumuh.1497540
  19. Revilla-León M, Gómez-Polo M, Vyas S, et al. Artificial Intelligence models for tooth-supported fixed and removable prosthodontics: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(2):276-292. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.001.
  20. Rokhshad R, Khosravi K, Motie P, et al. Deep learning applications in prosthodontics: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.04.009
  21. Rutkunas V, Gendviliene I, Auskalnis L, et al. Influence of Kennedy class and number of implants on the accuracy of dynamic implant navigation: an in vitro study using an X-Ray free evaluation methodology. J Dent. 2023;139:104679. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104679
  22. Alibrahim A, Al Salieti H, Alrawashdeh M, Darweesh H, Alsaleh H. Patterns and predictors of tooth loss among partially dentate individuals in Jordan: a cross-sectional study. Saudi Dent J. 2024;36(3):486-491. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.12.010
  23. Sultan Z, Waqas M, Hasan S, Kazmi S, Faheemuddin M, Alkhames H. Automated classification of partially edentulous arches using Artificial Intelligence. Int Dent J. 2024;74:S369. doi:10.1016/j.identj.2024.07.493
  24. Meine H, Metzger MC, Weingart P, et al. Determination of Kennedy’s classification in panoramic X-Rays by automated tooth labeling. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2025;20(9):1835-1843. doi:10.1007/s11548-025-03469-z
  25. Khurshid Z, Waqas M, Hasan S, Kazmi S, Faheemuddin M. Deep learning architecture to infer Kennedy classification of partially edentulous arches using object detection techniques and piecewise annotations. Int Dent J. 2025;75(1):223-235. doi:10.1016/j.identj.2024.11.005
  26. Hassan NA, Abdelmongi A, Magdi S, et al. A novel Artificial Intelligence approach to Kennedy classification for partially edentulous patients using panoramic radiographs. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2025; 33(2):155-163. doi:10.1922/EJPRD_2801Hassan09