Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 3

Predictors of re-rupture after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: the role of age and systemic comorbidities

Nasuhi Altay(Erzurum Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0002-5518-3938
Fatih Emre Topsakal(Erzurum Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0002-6033-0795
Ekrem Özdemir(Erzurum Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0002-3709-558X
Esra Demirel(Erzurum Şehir Hastanesi)0000-0002-8468-6286
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-19
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Detailed preoperative risk profiling may enable optimization of surgical planning and personalized rehabilitation strategies for high-risk patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: The aim of this study was to identify the comorbidities that most strongly influence re-rupture following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) and to determine the independent risk contributions of age, diabetes mellitus, bone mineral density (BMD), tear size, and retraction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A total of 481 patients who underwent primary arthroscopic full-thickness RCR between February 2020 and June 2024 were retrospectively reviewed; after exclusions, 392 patients were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Detailed preoperative risk profiling may enable optimization of surgical planning and personalized rehabilitation strategies for high-risk patients.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Rotator cuff repair · re-rupture · diabetes mellitus

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to identify the comorbidities that most strongly influence re-rupture following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) and to determine the independent risk contributions of age, diabetes mellitus, bone mineral density (BMD), tear size, and retraction. Methods: A total of 481 patients who underwent primary arthroscopic full-thickness RCR between February 2020 and June 2024 were retrospectively reviewed; after exclusions, 392 patients were included. Demographic variables, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, smoking, obesity, hypercholesterolemia), BMD, tear size, retraction, and fatty infiltration were collected from preoperative records. Functional outcomes were assessed with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant scores. Re-rupture was confirmed by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical functional loss. Risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: The re-rupture rate was 18.6% (73/392). Patients with re-rupture had significantly larger tears (38.9±9.2 mm, p 65 years (aOR 5.67, p<0.001), and large/massive tears (aOR 11.84, p<0.001) were identified as independent predictors of re-rupture. The model demonstrated excellent discrimination with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.927. Postoperative ASES (64.5), constant (62.8), and VAS (4.8) scores were significantly worse in the re-rupture group. Conclusion: Re-rupture after arthroscopic RCR is significantly associated with older age, diabetes mellitus, low bone mineral density, and large/massive tears. Among these, DEXA <-2 and diabetes mellitus emerge as the strongest determinants of structural healing. Detailed preoperative risk profiling may enable optimization of surgical planning and personalized rehabilitation strategies for high-risk patients.

🔖

Cite This Article

Altay, N., Topsakal, F. E., Özdemir, E., Demirel, E. (2026). Predictors of re-rupture after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: the role of age and systemic comorbidities. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1861072

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Gumina S, Carbone S, Campagna V, Candela V, Sacchetti FM, Giannicola G. The impact of aging on rotator cuff tear size. Musculoskelet Surg. 2013; 97(Suppl 1):69-72. doi:10.1007/s12306-013-0263-2
  2. Lambers Heerspink FO, Dorrestijn O, van Raay JJ, Diercks RL. Specific patient-related prognostic factors for rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(7):1073-1080. doi:10.1016/j.jse. 2014.01.001
  3. Tashjian RZ. Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin Sports Med. 2012;31(4):589-604. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2012.07.001
  4. Mall NA, Tanaka MJ, Choi LS, Paletta GA Jr. Factors affecting rotator cuff healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(9):778-788. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M. 00583
  5. Chung SW, Oh JH, Gong HS, Kim JY, Kim SH. Factors affecting rotator cuff healing after arthroscopic repair: osteoporosis as one of the independent risk factors. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10):2099-2107. doi: 10.1177/0363546511415659
  6. Tashjian RZ, Hollins AM, Kim HM, et al. Factors affecting healing rates after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(12):2435-2442. doi:10.1177/0363546510382835
  7. Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(6):1229-1240. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02035
  8. Harryman DT 2nd, Mack LA, Wang KY, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA 3rd. Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(7):982-989.
  9. Bedi A, Fox AJ, Harris PE, et al. Diabetes mellitus impairs tendon-bone healing after rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(7):978-988. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.11.045
  10. Dhar Y, Anakwenze OA, Steele B, Lozano S, Abboud JA. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: impact of diabetes mellitus on patient outcomes. Phys Sportsmed. 2013;41(1):22-29. doi:10.3810/psm.2013.02.1995
  11. Abboud JA, Kim JS. The effect of hypercholesterolemia on rotator cuff disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(6):1493-1497. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1151-9
  12. Beason DP, Tucker JJ, Lee CS, Edelstein L, Abboud JA, Soslowsky LJ. Rat rotator cuff tendon-to-bone healing properties are adversely affected by hypercholesterolemia. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(6):867-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.018
  13. Warrender WJ, Brown OL, Abboud JA. Outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs in obese patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(6):961-967. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.006
  14. Bishop JY, Santiago-Torres JE, Rimmke N, Flanigan DC. Smoking predisposes to rotator cuff pathology and shoulder dysfunction: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(8):1598-1605. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2015.01.026
  15. Galatz LM, Silva MJ, Rothermich SY, Zaegel MA, Havlioglu N, Thomopoulos S. Nicotine delays tendon-to-bone healing in a rat shoulder model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(9):2027-2034. doi:10. 2106/JBJS.E.00899
  16. Lundgreen K, Lian OB, Scott A, Nassab P, Fearon A, Engebretsen L. Rotator cuff tear degeneration and cell apoptosis in smokers versus nonsmokers. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(8):936-941. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2014. 03.027
  17. Wang G, Liu C, Wang J, Li H, Yu G. Risk factors for healing failure after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in small to medium-sized tears: a retrospective cohort study. Front Surg. 2024;11:1456540. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1456540
  18. Chuang HC, Chiu NT, Liu ZW, et al. Compensatory activation of periscapular muscles aids active abduction in patients with massive rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025;483(12):2295-2305. doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000003556
  19. Jollant F, Voegeli G, Kordsmeier NC, et al. A Visual Analog Scale to measure psychological and physical pain: a preliminary validation of the PPP-VAS in two independent samples of depressed patients. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019;90:55-61. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.10.018
  20. Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3(6):347-352. doi:10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0
  21. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;(214):160-164.
  22. Neyton L, Godenèche A, Nové-Josserand L, Carrillon Y, Cléchet J, Hardy MB. Arthroscopic suture-bridge repair for small to medium size supraspinatus tear: healing rate and retear pattern. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29(1):10-17. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.020
  23. Oh JH, Kim SH, Kang JY, Oh CH, Gong HS. Effect of age on functional and structural outcome after rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(4):672-678. doi:10.1177/0363546509352460
  24. Charousset C, Bellaïche L, Kalra K, Petrover D. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: is there tendon healing in patients aged 65 years or older? Arthroscopy. 2010;26(3):302-309. doi:10.1016/j.arthro. 2009.08.027
  25. Meyer DC, Fucentese SF, Koller B, Gerber C. Association of osteopenia of the humeral head with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(3):333-337. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2003.12.016
  26. Cadet ER, Hsu JW, Levine WN, Bigliani LU, Ahmad CS. The relationship between greater tuberosity osteopenia and the chronicity of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1):73-77. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.04. 017
  27. Park JY, Kim MH. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal humerus in Koreans: suture anchor in rotator cuff repair. Orthopedics. 2004;27(8):857-861. doi:10.3928/0147-7447-20040801-22
  28. Yakacki CM, Poukalova M, Guldberg RE, et al. The effect of the trabecular microstructure on the pullout strength of suture anchors. J Biomech. 2010;43(10):1953-1959. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.013
  29. Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Lehtinen J, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ. Anchor design and bone mineral density affect the pull-out strength of suture anchors in rotator cuff repair: which anchors are best to use in patients with low bone quality? Am J Sports Med. 2004;32(6):1466-1473. doi:10. 1177/0363546503262644
  30. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J. Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(11):1307-1316. doi:10. 1016/j.arthro.2005.08.011