SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 3

Oral health–related quality of life improvement following full-mouth implant rehabilitation in stage III/IV periodontitis patients

Evre III/IV reriodontitis hastalarında tam ağız implant rehabilitasyonunun ağız sağlığı ile ilişkili yaşam kalitesine etkisi

Fatma Soysal(ANKARA MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6581-6092
Hacer Eberliköse(ANKARA MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1450-1968
Zeliha Güney(ANKARA MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6897-0773
Caner Öztürk(ANKARA MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9549-2770
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-05-19
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Prosthetic design, especially the choice of fixed over removable prostheses, is crucial in achieving the best patient-reported outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly impairs oral function and quality of life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this longitudinal study, 54 patients diagnosed with stage III/IV periodontitis were enrolled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Prosthetic design, especially the choice of fixed over removable prostheses, is crucial in achieving the best patient-reported outcomes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Periodontitis · OHIP-14 · oral health-related quality of life

Abstract

Aims: Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly impairs oral function and quality of life. In advanced stages (stage III/IV), full-mouth extraction followed by implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation is often necessary, yet limited data are available regarding the effect of this transition on oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL). To assess the changes in OHRQoL among patients with stage III/IV periodontitis who underwent complete tooth extraction and full-arch implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation, and to evaluate the impact of clinical and demographic variables on patient-reported outcomes. Methods: In this longitudinal study, 54 patients diagnosed with stage III/IV periodontitis were enrolled. Clinical parameters and OHRQoL were assessed using the Turkish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). Measurements were recorded at two time points: at baseline (T0), when patients retained their natural dentition and clinical assessments were obtained from periodontal tissues, and at follow-up (T1), two years after completion of full-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation, when clinical assessments were performed on peri-implant tissues. Statistical analysis involved paired t-tests and multiple linear regression to evaluate changes and influencing factors. Results: A significant improvement in OHIP-14 scores was observed, decreasing from 44.96±11.63 at baseline to 16.81±8.61 after treatment (p<0.001). Clinical parameters (probing depth, attachment level, and bleeding on probing) also showed significant changes over time, with baseline measurements obtained from periodontal tissues (T0) and follow-up measurements reflecting peri-implant tissues (T1). Among evaluated factors, only prosthesis type significantly influenced follow-up OHIP-14 scores, with fixed prostheses associated with better outcomes (β=0.286, p=0.044). Conclusion: Full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation significantly enhances OHRQoL in patients with advanced periodontitis. Prosthetic design, especially the choice of fixed over removable prostheses, is crucial in achieving the best patient-reported outcomes.

Özet

Giriş: Periodontitis, oral fonksiyonu ve yaşam kalitesini önemli ölçüde olumsuz etkileyen kronik inflamatuar bir durumdur. İleri evrelerde (Evre III-IV) tam ağız diş çekimi ve ardından implant destekli protetik rehabilitasyon sıklıkla gerekli olmaktadır; ancak bu geçişin ağız sağlığı ile ilişkili yaşam kalitesi (OHRQoL) üzerindeki etkisine yönelik veriler sınırlıdır. Amaç: Evre III–IV periodontitis hastalarında tüm dişlerin çekimi ve tam ark implant destekli protetik rehabilitasyon sonrasında OHRQoL’deki değişiklikleri değerlendirmek ve klinik ile demografik değişkenlerin hasta bildirimli sonuçlar üzerindeki etkisini incelemek amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Evre III–IV periodontitis tanısı konulan 54 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Ağız Sağlığı Etki Profili-14 (OHIP-14) ölçeğinin Türkçe versiyonu tedavi öncesinde ve protetik rehabilitasyondan iki yıl sonra uygulandı. Periodontal parametreler ve sosyodemografik veriler kaydedildi. Değişiklikleri ve etkileyen faktörleri değerlendirmek için t-testi ve çoklu lineer regresyon analizleri kullanıldı. Bulgular: OHIP-14 skorlarında anlamlı bir iyileşme gözlendi; başlangıçta 44.96±11.63 olan skorlar tedavi sonrasında 16.81±8.61’e geriledi (p<0.001). Periodontal parametrelerde (sondlama derinliği, klinik ataşman kaybı ve sondlamada kanama) da belirgin iyileşme kaydedildi. Değerlendirilen faktörler arasında yalnızca protez türü tedaviler sonrası OHIP-14 skorlarını anlamlı olarak etkiledi; sabit protezler daha iyi sonuçlarla ilişkili bulundu (β=0.286, p=0.044). Sonuç: Tam ark implant destekli rehabilitasyon, ileri periodontitisli hastalarda OHRQoL’yi anlamlı düzeyde iyileştirmektedir. Protetik tasarım, özellikle sabit protez tercih edilmesi, en iyi hasta bildirimli sonuçların elde edilmesinde kritik bir rol oynamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Soysal, F., Eberliköse, H., Güney, Z., Öztürk, C. (2026). Oral health–related quality of life improvement following full-mouth implant rehabilitation in stage III/IV periodontitis patients. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1838238

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Papapanou PN, Sanz M, Buduneli N, et al. Periodontitis: consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S173-S182. doi:10.1002/JPER.17-0721
  2. Tonetti MS, Greenwell H, Kornman KS. Staging and grading of periodontitis: framework and proposal of a new classification and case definition. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S159-S172. doi:10.1002/JPER. 18-0006
  3. Buset SL, Walter C, Friedmann A, Weiger R, Borgnakke WS, Zitzmann NU. Are periodontal diseases really silent? A systematic review of their effect on quality of life. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(4):333-344. doi:10. 1111/jcpe.12517
  4. Shanbhag S, Dahiya M, Croucher R. The impact of periodontal therapy on oral health-related quality of life in adults: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(8):725-735. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01910.x
  5. Tonetti MS, Jepsen S, Jin L, Otomo-Corgel J. Impact of the global burden of periodontal diseases on health, nutrition and wellbeing of mankind: a call for global action. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(5):456-462. doi:10. 1111/jcpe.12732
  6. Liang YH, Chou C, Chen YJ, et al. Impact of periodontal disease and chewing ability on the quality of life of the elderly in an affluent community. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(11):1693-1701. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2020.01.002
  7. Sødal ATT, Skudutyte-Rysstad R, Diep MT, Koldsland OC, Hove LH. Periodontitis in a 65-year-old population: risk indicators and impact on oral health-related quality of life. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):640. doi:10.1186/s12903-026-07693-0
  8. Durham J, Fraser HM, McCracken GI, Stone KM, John MT, Preshaw PM. Impact of periodontitis on oral health-related quality of life. J Dent. 2013;41(4):370-376. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.01.008
  9. Efeoğlu NH, Başer Ü. Evaluation of the impact of different stages of periodontitis on quality of life with Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14): a systematic review. J Clin Pract Res. 2025;47(3):227. doi:10.14744/cpr.2025.99232
  10. Bajunaid SO, Alshahrani AS, Aldosari AA, et al. Patients’ satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life of edentulous patients using conventional complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures in Saudi Arabia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(1):557. doi:10. 3390/ijerph19010557
  11. Duong HY, Roccuzzo A, Stähli A, Salvi GE, Lang NP, Sculean A. Oral health-related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant-supported dental prostheses. Periodontol 2000. 2022;88(1):201-237. doi:10.1111/prd.12419
  12. Feine J, Abou-Ayash S, Al Mardini M, et al. Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: patient-reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):270-275. doi:10.1111/clr.13299
  13. Fuller J, Donos N, Suvan J, Tsakos G, Nibali L. Association of oral health-related quality of life measures with aggressive and chronic periodontitis. J Periodontal Res. 2020;55(4):574-580. doi:10.1111/jre.12745
  14. Moya-Villaescusa MJ, Sánchez-Pérez A, Esparza-Marín J, Jornet-García A, Montoya-Carralero JM. Periodontal disease and nonsurgical periodontal therapy on the OHRQoL of the patient: a pilot study of case series. Dent J (Basel). 2023;11(4):94. doi:10.3390/dj11040094
  15. El MA, Elgamal M, Askar OM, Al-Tonbary GY. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of conventional denture, fixed prosthesis and milled bar overdenture for All-on-4 implant rehabilitation: a crossover study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(11): 1107-1117. doi:10.1111/clr.13524
  16. Gonçalves GSY, de Magalhães KMF, Rocha EP, Dos Santos PH, Assunção WG. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported full dentures all-on-four concept: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(1):83-94. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04213-y
  17. Başol ME, Karaağaçlıoğlu L, Yılmaz B. Türkçe Ağız Sağlığı Etki Ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: OHIP-14-TR. Turkiye Klin J Dent Sci. 2014; 20(2):80-87. doi:10.5336/dentalsci.2013-36842
  18. Mumcu G, Inanc N, Ergun T, et al. Oral health-related quality of life is affected by disease activity in Behçet's disease. Oral Dis. 2006;12(2):145-151. doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01173.x
  19. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-3191. doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  20. Tuğay BU, Tuğay N, Güney H, Hazar Z, Yüksel İ, Atilla B. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of Oxford Hip Score. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(6):879-889. doi:10.1007/s00402-015-2215-9
  21. Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):7-21. doi:10.1111/prd.12185
  22. Graziani F, Tsakos G. Patient-based outcomes and quality of life. Periodontol 2000. 2020;83(1):277-294. doi:10.1111/prd.12305
  23. Nitschke I, Müller F. The impact of oral health on the quality of life in the elderly. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2004;2(Suppl 1):271-275.
  24. Coltro M, Villarinho EA, Ozkomur A, Shinkai RS. Long-term impact of implant-supported oral rehabilitation on quality of life: a 5-year prospective study. Aust Dent J. 2022;67(2):172-177. doi:10.1111/adj.12906
  25. Berretin-Felix G, Nary Filho H, Padovani CR, Machado WM. A longitudinal study of quality of life of elderly with mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(7):704-708. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01451.x
  26. Oh SH, Kim Y, Park JY, Jung YJ, Kim SK, Park SY. Comparison of fixed implant-supported prostheses, removable implant-supported prostheses, and complete dentures: patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(2):e31-e37. doi:10. 1111/clr.12514
  27. Bidra AS, Daubert DM, Garcia LT, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for recall and maintenance of patients with tooth-borne and implant-borne dental restorations. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(Suppl 1):S32-S40. doi:10.1111/jopr.12416
  28. van der Moolen PL, Post BJ, Slot DE, van der Weijden FA. Outcome of peri-implant maintenance care in patients with an implant-supported lower denture: a 3.5-year retrospective analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23(2):236-243. doi:10.1111/cid.12963