Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 4

Evaluation of alveolar bone density around abutments in fixed prostheses designed according to prosthetic principles using CBCT: a retrospective study

Bülent Kadir Tartuk(BINGOL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY)0000-0003-2282-8944
Eyyüp Altıntaş(FIRAT UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY)0000-0002-7767-9694
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Normalization-based CBCT analysis enhances comparability among scans taken with differing imaging parameters and provides a useful method for detecting longitudinal variations in peri-abutment bone density.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate temporal changes in the alveolar bone density surrounding abutment teeth in fixed prosthetic restorations designed according to prosthetic principles, using normalized gray values obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Among 211 patients who had undergone at least two CBCT scans within the last decade (2016-2025), 15 patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Normalization-based CBCT analysis enhances comparability among scans taken with differing imaging parameters and provides a useful method for detecting longitudinal variations in peri-abutment bone density.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2016-2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bone density · cone-beam computed tomography · denture partial fixed

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate temporal changes in the alveolar bone density surrounding abutment teeth in fixed prosthetic restorations designed according to prosthetic principles, using normalized gray values obtained from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Among 211 patients who had undergone at least two CBCT scans within the last decade (2016-2025), 15 patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected. A total of 22 fixed dental bridges and 55 abutment teeth were evaluated, with a mean actual follow-up duration of 15.9\pm 6.3 months (range: 8.3-31.5 months). For each abutment, a 2-mm circumferential peri-radicular bone zone was segmented using 3D Slicer software. To minimize variability arising from different imaging parameters, gray values were normalized based on the theoretical -1000 HU reference of the maxillary sinus air cavity. To account for intra-subject clustering, data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model (LMM) and Pearson correlation analysis. A significance level of p<0.05 was adopted. Results: No statistically significant difference was detected between the normalized bone density values at T1 and T2 according to the LMM (F=0.217, p=0.642). Examination of the measurements from both time points revealed a strong positive correlation, indicating that baseline and follow-up normalized gray values remained statistically unchanged throughout the observation period (p<0.001). Conclusion: In fixed prosthetic restorations planned in accordance with established prosthetic principles, the alveolar bone density surrounding abutment teeth did not exhibit a significant change over the follow-up period. Normalization-based CBCT analysis enhances comparability among scans taken with differing imaging parameters and provides a useful method for detecting longitudinal variations in peri-abutment bone density.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tartuk, B. K., Akgül, M. C., Altıntaş, E. (2026). Evaluation of alveolar bone density around abutments in fixed prostheses designed according to prosthetic principles using CBCT: a retrospective study. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1921927

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Shillingburg HT, Sather DA, eds. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed. Quintessence Publishing Co Inc; 2012.
  2. England GM, Moon ES, Roth J, et al. Conditions and calibration to obtain comparable grey values between different clinical cone beam computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46(2):20160322. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20160322
  3. Selvaraj A, Jain RK, Nagi R, Balasubramaniam A. Correlation between gray values of cone-beam computed tomograms and Hounsfield units of computed tomograms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Imaging Sci Dent. 2022;52(2):133-140. doi:10.5624/isd.20210274
  4. JASP Team. JASP. Version 0.19.3. Published 2025. https://jasp-stats.org
  5. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41(4):1149-1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  6. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Psychology Press; 2009.
  7. Ciocan-Pendefunda AA, Apostu AM, Antohe ME, Dascălu CG, Țănculescu O. Correlations between the long-span fixed dental prostheses and periodontal tissues modifications. Roman J Oral Rehabil. 2021;13(2):148-155.
  8. Rehmann P, Podhorsky A, Schaaf D, Rudel K, Wöstmann B. Long-span fixed dental prostheses not meeting Ante’s law: a retrospective analysis. Quintessence Int. 2015;46(1):51-57. doi:10.3290/j.qi.a32816
  9. Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Singer SR, Mupparapu M. CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140238. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20140238
  10. Wilson AN, Middleton J, Jones ML, McGuinness NJ. The finite element analysis of stress in the periodontal ligament when subject to vertical orthodontic forces. Br J Orthod. 1994;21(2):161-167. doi:10.1179/bjo.21.2.161
  11. Kovačević Pavičić D, Delić Z, Lajnert V, Fugosić V, Simonić Kocijan S, Buković D. Changes of alveolar bone density around the abutment teeth in patients wearing removable partial dentures depending on Kennedy classification. Coll Antropol. 2009;33(4):1349-1352.
  12. Hsu JT, Chang HW, Huang HL, Yu JH, Li YF, Tu MG. Bone density changes around teeth during orthodontic treatment. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(4):511-519. doi:10.1007/s00784-010-0410-1
  13. Yu JH, Huang HL, Liu CF, et al. Does orthodontic treatment affect the alveolar bone density? Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(10):e3080. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000003080
  14. Watanabe C, Wada J, Mizutani K, Watanabe H, Wakabayashi N. Chronological grey scale changes in supporting alveolar bone by removable partial denture placement on patients with periodontal disease: a 6-month follow-up study using digital subtraction analysis. J Dent. 2017;63:8-13. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2017.05.004