Journals / Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 4

How informative is YouTube for Freiberg disease? A cross-sectional analysis of video quality and content

Numan Mercan(Necip Fazil City Hospital)0000-0002-0581-7023
Tevfik Çatal(Necip Fazil City Hospital)0000-0001-5151-6478
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the overall educational quality and disease-specific content adequacy of YouTube videos about Freiberg disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the overall educational quality and disease-specific content adequacy of YouTube videos about Freiberg disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted on December 8, 2025.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Level of Evidence: Level IV, cross-sectional observational study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Freiberg disease · YouTube · patient education

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the overall educational quality and disease-specific content adequacy of YouTube videos about Freiberg disease. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted on December 8, 2025. A search was performed on YouTube using six keywords related to Freiberg disease, sorted by relevance. The first 50 videos for each keyword were screened. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and removing duplicates, 29 unique videos were incorporated into the analysis. The videos were assessed utilizing the DISCERN and JAMA Benchmark criteria, the Global Quality Score (GQS), and the Freiberg Scoring System (FSS) established by the authors. The Kruskal-Wallis test was employed for group comparisons, and the Spearman rho test was used for correlation analyses. Results: The mean total scores for DISCERN and FSS were 36.36±7.98 and 7.05±1.78, respectively. The median JAMA and GQS scores were 2.00 and 3.00, respectively. The presenter’s qualification was significantly associated with total DISCERN, JAMA, GQS, and FSS scores. Videos presented by orthopedic surgeons exhibited the highest median quality scores. Strong positive correlations were found between DISCERN, GQS, and FSS. Video duration was positively associated with some quality scores, but most engagement metrics did not show a significant relationship with quality. Conclusion: YouTube videos about Freiberg disease demonstrate moderate educational quality and moderate adequacy of disease-specific content. While the source of the content appears to influence quality, popularity metrics do not reliably reflect educational value. There is a need for more accurate, comprehensive, and patient-centered video content on Freiberg disease. Level of Evidence: Level IV, cross-sectional observational study.

🔖

Cite This Article

Mercan, N., Çatal, T. (2026). How informative is YouTube for Freiberg disease? A cross-sectional analysis of video quality and content. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, Volume: 9 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1932608

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Scartozzi G, Schram A, Janigian J. Freiberg’s infraction of the second metatarsal head with formation of multiple loose bodies. J Foot Surg. 1989;28(3):195-199.
  2. Cerrato RA. Freiberg’s disease. Foot Ankle Clin. 2011;16(4):647-658. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2011.08.008
  3. Talusan PG, Diaz-Collado PJ, Reach JS Jr. Freiberg’s infraction: diagnosis and treatment. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014;7(1):52-56. doi:10.1177/1938640013510314
  4. Schade VL. Surgical management of Freiberg’s infraction: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Spec. 2015;8(6):498-519. doi:10.1177/1938640015585 966
  5. Seybold JD, Zide JR. Treatment of Freiberg disease. Foot Ankle Clin. 2018;23(1):157-169. doi:10.1016/j.fcl.2017.09.011
  6. Wax A, Leland R. Freiberg disease and avascular necrosis of the metatarsal heads. Foot Ankle Clin. 2019;24(1):69-82. doi:10.1016/j.fcl. 2018.11.003
  7. Yoshimura I, Takao M, Wagner E, et al. Evidence-based treatment algorithm for Freiberg disease. Cartilage. 2024;15(1):58-64. doi:10.1177/19476035231205676
  8. Mercan N, Eravsar E, Ergin M, Çatal T, Çiftci S, Akkaya M. Evaluation of ChatGPT-5 responses to patient-centered questions on stromal vascular fraction for knee osteoarthritis: fair to good quality and content. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2026;27(1):348. doi:10.1186/s12891-026-09731-y
  9. Zhang X, Yang Y, Shen YW, et al. Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: a YouTube-based quality-control study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:972348. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348
  10. Kunze KN, Alter KH, Cohn MR, et al. YouTube videos provide low-quality educational content about rotator cuff disease. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2022;25(3):217-223. doi:10.5397/cise.2022.00927
  11. Yu JS, Manzi JE, Apostolakos JM, Carr Ii JB, Dines JS. YouTube as a source of patient education information for elbow ulnar collateral ligament injuries: a quality control content analysis. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2022;25(2):145-153. doi:10.5397/cise.2021.00717
  12. Özcan F, Gürçay E. Is the information about lateral epicondylitis on the YouTube platform reliable and of good quality? Phys Sportsmed. 2023; 51(5):458-462. doi:10.1080/00913847.2022.2129504
  13. Karagoz B, Bakir M, Kececi T. Evaluation of the accuracy and quality of information in videos about lateral epicondylitis shared on internet video sharing services. Cureus. 2022;14(2):e22583. doi:10.7759/cureus.22583
  14. Eravsar E, Mercan N. Platelet-rich plasma videos for knee osteoarthritis on YouTube are of acceptable quality and content. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025;104(30):e43437. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000043437
  15. Abed V, Sullivan BM, Skinner M, et al. YouTube is a poor-quality source for patient information regarding patellar dislocations. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023;5(2):e459-e464. doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2023.01.014
  16. Kıvrak A, Ulusoy İ. How high is the quality of the videos about children’s elbow fractures on Youtube? J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):166. doi:10.1186/s13018-023-03648-1
  17. Yüce A, İğde N, Ergün T, Mısır A. YouTube provides insufficient information on patellofemoral instability. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2022;56(5):306-310. doi:10.5152/j.aott.2022.22005
  18. Lama CJ, Hartnett DA, Donnelly JC, et al. YouTube as a source of patient information for cubital tunnel syndrome: an analysis of video reliability, quality, and content. Hand (N Y). 2024;19(6):986-994. doi:10.1177/15589 447231151428
  19. Goyal R, Mercado AE, Ring D, Crijns TJ. Most YouTube videos about carpal tunnel syndrome have the potential to reinforce misconceptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479(10):2296-2302. doi:10.1097/CORR.0000000000001773
  20. Sozlu U, Ayas IH, Kjær BH, Basar S, Kanatlı U. Educational quality of YouTube videos on scapular dyskinesis: a cross-sectional analysis. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2025;28(3):306-316. doi:10.5397/cise.2025.00346
  21. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53(2):105-111. doi:10.1136/jech.53.2.105
  22. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor-Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277(15): 1244-1245.
  23. Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):2070-2077. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01325.x
  24. Javidan A, Nelms MW, Li A, et al. Evaluating YouTube as a source of education for patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2023;278(4):e712-e718. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000005892
  25. Kaymakoglu M, Aksoy T, Kolac UC, et al. Source-dependent quality variation in shoulder dislocation videos on YouTube. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024;6(3):100921. doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100921
  26. Martinez VH, Ojo D, Gutierrez-Naranjo JM, Proffitt M, Hartzler RU. The most popular YouTube videos about shoulder replacement are of poor quality for patient education. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023;5(3):e623-e628. doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2023.03.001
  27. Cole EW, Bach KE, Theismann JJ, et al. Physician-led YouTube videos related to anterior cruciate ligament injuries provide higher-quality educational content compared to other sources. J ISAKOS. 2025;10:100367. doi:10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100367
  28. Ng MK, Emara AK, Molloy RM, Krebs VE, Mont M, Piuzzi NS. YouTube as a source of patient information for total knee/hip arthroplasty: quantitative analysis of video reliability, quality, and content. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(20):e1034-e1044. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00910
  29. Osman W, Mohamed F, Elhassan M, Shoufan A. Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):382. doi:10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z