Flexibility is assumed as a resultant of different adaptation tactics, and their combinations.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study discusses how the existing primary and middle school buildings can be adapted to the new needs emerging in the Covid-19 process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The three levels of adaptation are defined as follows: Building envelope-outdoor space relationship, plan layout-function relationship, and furniture relocation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Flexibility is assumed as a resultant of different adaptation tactics, and their combinations.
This study discusses how the existing primary and middle school buildings can be adapted to the new needs emerging in the Covid-19 process. The three levels of adaptation are defined as follows: Building envelope-outdoor space relationship, plan layout-function relationship, and furniture relocation. In the scope of this study, four selected school plans were evaluated in the context of flexibility in the plan layout-function relationship. In this study, the concept of “adaptation” is considered as a design approach at the early design phase and/or intervention to respond to a new need in the life cycle of the building. Flexibility is assumed as a resultant of different adaptation tactics, and their combinations.
Güzelci, O. Z., Alaçam, S., Kocabay, S., Akkuyu, E. (2020). Adaptability of Primary and Middle Schools to Post-Pandemic Reuse - A Discussion in the Context of Flexibility. Journal of Design Studio, Volume: 2 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.776665
Abbasi, N. (2016). Adolescent identity formation and the school environment, In Kenn Fisher (Ed.), The Translational Design of Schools (pp. 81-103). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Akyürek, O. (1973). Bir Orta Okul Binası. Arkitekt, 350, 70.
da Graça, V. A. C., Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K., & Petreche, J. R. D. (2007). An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimisation of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of the State São Paulo in Brazil. Building and Environment, 42(2), 984-999.
Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: The school as socio-spatial assemblage. The Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 43-63.
Dudek, M. (2007). A design manual schools and kindergartens. Berlin: Birkhäuser Verlag AG.
Kızıltan, A. (1967). Birleşik Amerikada Eğitim ve İlkokul Planlaması Yöntemler ve Eğilimler. İstanbul: İsmail Akgün Matbaası.
Köse, Ç., & Barkul, Ö. (2012). İlköğretim Yapılarında Tip Proje Uygulama Sorunları Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Megaron, 7(2), 94-102.
Online Etymology Dictionary (2020). Retrieved July 30, 2020, from https://www.etymonline.com/word/pandemic Pereira, P. R. P., Kowaltowski, D. C. C. K., & Deliberador, M. S. (2018). Analysis support for the design process of school buildings. Ambiente Construído, 18(3), 375-390.
Tapkı, S., & Canbay Türkyılmaz, Ç. (2018). İlköğretim Yapılarında Ergonomi Kavramının İncelenmesi: TİP Proje İlkokulu ile Tasarım Projesi İlkokulunun Karşılaştırılması. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 6(ÖS: Ergonomi2017), 220-233.
Woodman, K. (2016). Re-placing flexibility: Flexibility in learning spaces and learning, In Kenn Fisher (Ed.), The Translational Design of Schools (pp. 51-79). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Yürekli, F. (1983). Mimari Tasarımda Belirsizlik Esneklik/Uyarlık İhtiyacının Kaynakları ve Çözümü Üzerine Bir Araştırma. (Thesis of Associate Professorship), İstanbul: İTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Baskı Atölyesi.