Journals / Ege Klinikleri Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1

The Change Of Intraocular Pressure İn Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma Patients After Visual Field Testing

Psödoeksfoliyatif Glokom Hastalarında Görme Alanı Testi Sonrası Göz İçi Basınç Değişiklikleri

Pages
13–17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: No significant intraocular pressure change was observed after visual field testing using 24-2 SITA Standard strategy allowing short test duration in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To demonstrate the effect of visual field test on intraocular pressure values in patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma followed up in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: From October 2015 to February 2016, 38 eyes of 30 patients who came to our clinic for glaucoma control were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: No significant intraocular pressure change was observed after visual field testing using 24-2 SITA Standard strategy allowing short test duration in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate the effect of visual field test on intraocular pressure values in patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma followed up in our clinic. Materials and methods: From October 2015 to February 2016, 38 eyes of 30 patients who came to our clinic for glaucoma control were included. Immediately before, immediately after (0 min), at 15th and 30th minutes using the 24-2 SITA Standard strategy, intraocular pressures measured by Icare Rebaund Tonometer were compared. Results: Sixteen (53.3%) of the patients were male and 14 (46.7%) were female. 12 patients had left, 10 patients had right and 8 patients had bilateral pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. The mean age was 68.9 ± 5.1 years. The mean duration of the test was 5.7 ± 0.5 minutes. The mean intraocular pressure immediately before the VFT was 17.3±4.3 mmHg, the mean masured IOP immediately after the VFT was 17.4±3.9 mmHg, 17.3±3.8 mmHg at the 15th minute, and 30th minutes was 17.5±4.0 mmHg. There was no statistically significant difference between the measurements made before and after the test(p= 0.741, p=0.531, p=0.144 respectively). Only medical treatment was applied to 22 of the eyes followed by trabeculectomy with 4 eyes only and medical treatment and trabeculectomy combined with 12 eyes. There was no clinical difference in pressure changes at 0 minute, 15th and 30th minütes between the different treatment groups. Conclusion: No significant intraocular pressure change was observed after visual field testing using 24-2 SITA Standard strategy allowing short test duration in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients.

Özet

Amaç: Kliniğimizde takip edilen Psödoeksfoliyatif glokom hastalarında görme alanı testinin göz içi basınç değerlerine etkisini göstermek. Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışmamıza Ekim 2015 – Şubat 2016 arası kliniğimiz glokom birimine kontrole gelen 30 hastanın 38 gözü dahil edildi. 24-2 SITA Standard stratejisi kullanılarak uygulanan görme alanı testi hemen öncesi, hemen sonrası(0. Dk), 15.dk ve 30.dk da Icare Rebound Tonometri ile ölçülen göz içi basınç değerleri karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların 16 (%53,3)’sı erkek, 14 (46,7)’ü kadındı. 12 hastada sol, 10 hastada sağ ve 8 hastada bilateral Psödoeksfoliyatif glokom mevcuttu. Ortalama yaş 68,9 ± 5,1 idi. Ortalama test süresi 5,7 ± 0,5 dakika olarak saptandı. GA testi öncesi ortalama GİB 17.3±4.3 mmHg’ iken GA testi sonrası hemen ölçülen ortalama GİB 17.4±3.9 mmHg, 15. Dk’ da 17.3±3.8 mmHg ve 30.dk’ da 17.5±4.0 mmHg idi. Önce yapılan ölçümlerle test sonrası yapılan ölçümler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptanmadı( sırasıyla p= 0.741, p=0.531, p=0.144). Tutulum izlenen gözlerin 22’ sine sadece medikal tedavi uygulanırken 4 göze sadece trabekülektomi ve 12 göze ise medikal tedavi ve trabekülektomi kombine uygulanmıştı. Farklı tedavi uygulanan gruplar arasında; 0.dk, 15.dk ve 30.dk basınç değişimleri klinik olarak farklı değildi. Sonuç: Psödoeksfoliyatif glokom hastalarında kısa test sürelerine izin veren 24-2 SITA Standard stratejisi kullanılarak uygulanan görme alanı testi sonrası anlamlı bir göz içi basınç değişikliği izlenmedi.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKMAZ, O., BİNZET, M., GEDİZ, F., KÜSBECİ, T. (2019). The Change Of Intraocular Pressure İn Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma Patients After Visual Field Testing. Ege Klinikleri Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1, 13–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/150649

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Schmidt T, The use of the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Transactions of the Ophthalmological Societies of the United Kingdom,vol.79,pp.637–650,1959. 2. Agarwal HC, Gulati V, Sihota R, Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology,vol.48,no.4,pp.301–306,2000. 3. Brusini P.,Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma vol.15,pp.213-17,2006. 4. Pakrou N.,Gray T, Clinical comparison of the ICare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma vol.17,pp.43-7,2008. 5. Asrani S, Chatterjee A, Evaluation of the ICare rebound tonometer as a home intraocular pressure monitoring device. J Glaucoma vol.20,no.2,pp.74-9, 2011. 6. Baykara M, Türüdü S, Zaim N ve ark. Icare Tonometresi ve Goldmann Aplanasyon Tonometrelerinin Klinik Olarak Karşılaştırılması. Uludag Medical Journal. Vol.37,no.2,pp.89-91,2011. 7. Recupero SM, Contestabile MT, Taverniti L et al. Open-angle glaucoma: variations in the intraocular pressure after visual field examination. J Glaucoma,vol.12,no.2,pp.114–118,2003. 8. Rebolleda G, Rodr´ıguez-Villace C, Anton MV et al. Variations in intraocular pressure after visual field examination. J Glaucoma,vol.13,no.2,pp.178–179,2004. 9. Martin L, Intraocular pressure before and after visual field examination. Eye, vol. 21, no.12,pp.1479–1481,2007. 10. Konstas AGP, Stewart WC, Stromman GA, Clinical presentation and initial treatment patterns in patients with exfoliation glaucoma versus primer open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmol Surg Lasers vol.28,pp.111-117,1997. 11. Konstas AGP, Mantziris DA, Stewart WC, Diurinal intraocular pressure in untreated exfoliation and primer open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol vol.115,pp.182-185,1997. 12. Altıntaş O, Yüksel N, KarabaşVL ve ark. Diurnal intraocular pressure variation in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Eur J Ophthalmol. Vol.14,pp.495-500,2004. 13. Gumus K, Bozkurt B, Sonmez B ve ark. Diurnal variation of intraocular pressure and its correlation with retinal nerve fiber analysis in Turkish patients with exfoliation syndrome. Gra-efes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. Vol.244,pp.170-176,2006. 14. Scuderi GL, Cascone NC, Regine F et al. Validity and limits of the rebound tonometer (ICare®). Eur J Ophthalmol.vol. 21,no.3,pp.251-7,2011. 15. Ni N, Tsai JC, Shields MB et al. Elevation of intraocular pressure in glaucoma patients after au