SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal for the Interdisciplinary Art and Education / 2026 / Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Examining shared experience in visual design in three categories

Mehmet Remzi Demirel(Dicle Üniversitesi, Sanat ve Tasarım Fakültesi, Görsel İletişim Tasarımı Bölümü)0000-0002-9075-4513
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is concluded that the shared experience resulting from the different ways in which users communicate with the object has certain limitations in all three categories.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The concept of the shared experience plays an important role in human life as well as in the arts and sciences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Because users communicate with the objects in the environment they are in, depending on the time, and as a result of this communication they can be psychologically affected in a positive or negative way.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is concluded that the shared experience resulting from the different ways in which users communicate with the object has certain limitations in all three categories.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Shared Experience · Artificial world · Real world

Abstract

The concept of the shared experience plays an important role in human life as well as in the arts and sciences. Because users communicate with the objects in the environment they are in, depending on the time, and as a result of this communication they can be psychologically affected in a positive or negative way. In this sense, it is necessary to study what kind of structure the objects have in the shared experience space in which the user is located. The main purpose of the research is to examine the concept of shared experience in visual design by considering the relationship between user, object and time in three different worlds: real, artificial and virtual. The method used for the article was document analysis, one of the qualitative research methods. In this context, a search process was carried out in various sources, based on the keywords experience and common experience concept. At the centre of these different worlds, which are treated in three different categories, are the user and the object. It is concluded that the shared experience resulting from the different ways in which users communicate with the object has certain limitations in all three categories. In the real world, due to the unique structures of natural objects, shared experience means unlimited diversity for users, while in the artificial world, objects have more limitations due to their imitation or similar structure. It was found that the virtual world simulates the real world and therefore has certain limitations in terms of originality and creativity. It was also found that all three worlds are different from each other in terms of structural aspects and user experience. As a result, it was concluded that real, artificial and virtual worlds have intertwined relationships with each other in the context of shared experience; the real world can be defined as the universe, the artificial world is a subset of the real world, and the virtual world is a subset of the artificial world. It was also concluded that these defined the worlds have the potential to show variability in the context of object-time relationships.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirel, M. R. (2024). Examining shared experience in visual design in three categories. Journal for the Interdisciplinary Art and Education, Volume: 5 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12601833

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (53)

  1. Allanwood, G., Beare, P. (2019). User experience design: a practical introduction. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  2. Al-Qahtani, A. A., S Alenzi, A. A., & Ali, A. S. (2020). Playerunknown's battlegrounds: yet another internet gaming addiction. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC, 32 (1), 145–146.
  3. Battarbee, K. (2004). Co-Experience, understanding user experiences in social interaction (Doctoral Thesis). Publication Series of the University of Art and Design Helsinki, Finland.
  4. Battarbee, K. (2003). Defining Co-Experience. Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, New York, 23-26 June 2003, 109-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/782896.782923
  5. Bombari, D., Schmid Mast, M., Canadas, E., & Bachmann, M. (2015). Studying social interactions through immersive virtual environment technology: virtues, pitfalls, and future challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 869. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00869
  6. Boothby, E. J., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2014). Shared experiences are amplified. Psychological Science, 25(12), 2209–2216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551162
  7. Bratman G. N. vd. (2019). Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective. Science Advances, 5(7). https://doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax0903
  8. Buley, L. (2013). The user experience team of one: a research and design survival guide. Page 4. United States: Rosenfeld Media.
  9. Caddick, R., Cable, S. (2011). Communicating the user experience: a practical guide for creating useful ux documentation. Germany: Wiley.
  10. Chernikova, O., Heitzmann, N., Stadler, M., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T., & Fischer, F. (2020). Simulation-based learning in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(4), 499–541. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320933544
  11. Coxon, I. (2014). Fundamental aspects of human experience: a phenomeno(logical) explanation, page 11. editor: peter benz. experience design: concepts and case studies. United Kingdom: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  12. Crespo, R. F., & Mesurado, B. (2015). Happiness economics, eudaimonia and positive psychology: From happiness economics to flourishing economics. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 16(4), 931–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9541-4
  13. Çilenti, K. (1979). Educational Technology. Ankara: Kadıoğlu Matbaası.
  14. Eğüz, E. B. (2022). A Research on Augmented Reality Applications and User Experience in the Context of the Concept of Convergence. Page 204. İstanbul: Efe Akademi Yayınları.
  15. Ergen İ. (2023). The effect of experience design on graphic design. Journal of Arts, 6(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.31566/arts.1969
  16. Ertürk, M. (2018). Aesthetic Experience in Visual Communication Design and The Importance of First Attraction. İdil Sanat ve Dil Dergisi, 7(41), Doi: 10.7816 /idil-07-41-08
  17. Forster, N. (1994). The analysis of company documentation. C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds). Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical guide. London: Sage Publications.
  18. Geddes, O., & Passmore, H.-A. (2021). Green exercise: Actively flourishing in nature. In E. Brymer, M. Rogerson, & J. Barton (Eds.), Nature and health: Physical activity in nature (pp. 35–46). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003154419-4
  19. Goodman, E., Kuniavsky, M., Moed, A. (2012). Observing the user experience: a practitioner's guide to user research. Page 45. Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
  20. Hartson, R., Pyla, P. S. (2012). The UX Book: Process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. pages 3-7. Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
  21. Hussain A. T., Halford E., AlKaabi F. (2023). The Abu Dhabi Police Virtual Training Centre: A case study for building a virtual reality development capacity and capability. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paad028
  22. Keniger, L., Gaston, K., Irvine, K. N., & Fuller, R. (2013). What are the benefits of interacting with nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(3), 913–935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913
  23. Küçük, M. (2012). Communication information, communication concept and communication process. Page 10. Eskişehir: T.C. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını
  24. Landriscina, F. (2013). Simulation and learning: a model-centered approach. Pages 1-7. United States: Springer New York.
  25. Lateef, F. (2010). Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing. Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock, 3(4), 348-352 doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.70743
  26. Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, Explicated, Communication Theory, 14(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
  27. Miller, L. (2015). The Practitioner's Guide to User Experience Design. United Kingdom: Little, Brown Book Group.
  28. Miller, R. (2016) Oculus founder thinks VR may affect your ability to perceive time passing. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2016/3/17/11258718/palmer-luckey-oculus-time-vr-virtual-reality-gdc-2016 12.03.2024
  29. Mullen, G., & Davidenko, N. (2021). Time Compression in Virtual Reality. Timing & Time Perception, 9(4), 377-392. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134468-bja10034
  30. Özsoy V., & Ayaydın A. (2016). Visual Design Elements and Principles. Page 55. Ankara: Pegem Akademi
  31. Plambech T. & Konijnendijk C. (2015). The impact of nature on creativity – A study among Danish creative professionals, Urban Forestry - Urban Greening, 14(3), 255-263 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.02.006
  32. Puhakka R. & Hakoköngäs E. (2024) Adolescents’ experiences in nature: Sources of everyday well-being, Journal of Leisure Research, 55(2), 250-269, doi: 10.1080/00222216.2023.2204346
  33. Riaz, T., Akram, M., Afera, A., Parmar, P. (2023). The PUBG Paradox: Exploring the Link between Video Games and Suicide Risk. IAIM, 10(8), 8-14.
  34. Schatzschneider, C., Bruder, G., & Steinicke, F. (2016). Who turned the clock? Effects of manipulated zeitgebers, cognitive load and immersion on time estimation. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph., 22(4), 1387–1395. doi: 10.1109/tvcg.2016.2518137.
  35. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial, third edition, Page 5, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press
  36. Summer, M. (2020). Connecting with life: finding nature in an urban world. Page 27. USA: Summer Press.
  37. Sunil, S., Sharma, M. K., & Anand, N. (2021). Impact of PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG) on mental health. The Medico-legal Journal, 89(2), 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817220981817
  38. Tal A, Wansink B. (2011). Turning Virtual Reality into Reality: A Checklist to Ensure Virtual Reality Studies of Eating Behavior and Physical Activity Parallel the Real World. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 5(2), 239-244. doi:10.1177/193229681100500206
  39. Trevors, J.T. & Saier Jr., M.H. (2010) A Tale of Two Worlds: The Natural World and the Artificial World. Water Air Soil Pollut 205 (Suppl 1), 37–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9444-7
  40. Turan, M. T., & Besirli, A. (2008). Impacts of urbanization process on mental health. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 9(4), 238-243.
  41. Turner, W. R., T. Nakamura, and M. Dinetti. (2004). Global Urbanization and The Separation Of Humans From Nature. BioScience, 54(6), 585–590. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0585:GUATSO]2.0.CO;2
  42. Turner, P. (2017). A Psychology of User Experience: Involvement, Affect and Aesthetics. Pages 9-10. Germany: Springer International Publishing.
  43. Wang, W. (2020). Difference between the Real World and Virtual World, Proceedings 47, no. 1: 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2020047035
  44. Wilson, R. (2007). Nature and young children: encouraging creative play and learning in natural environments. Pages 4-5. United States: Taylor & Francis.
  45. Wright, T., Boria, E., & Breidenbach, P. (2002). Creative Player Actions in FPS Online Video Games. Playing Counter-Strike. The International Journal of Computer Game Research, 2(2), 103-123.
  46. Yeh, C. W., Hung, S. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2022). The influence of natural environments on creativity. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 895213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.895213Visual Bibliography
  47. Figure 1. Demirel, M. R. (2024). Real, artificial and virtual worlds
  48. Figure 2: Pidvalnyi, O. (2022). Tenerife, Spain. Pixabay. https://pixabay.com/photos/park-mountains-tenerife- teide-7670716/
  49. Figure 3: Steinmetz, T. (2021). New york, Manhattan. Pixabay. https://pixabay.com/photos/new-york- manhattan-usa-skyscrapers-6578473/
  50. Figure 4: Decentraland, https://decentraland.org/
  51. Figure 5: Jolanda, D. (2013) Four seasons of an oak tree (Die vier Jahreszeiten einer Eiche). Flickr. https://www.flickr.com/photos/120241063@N05/14596241385
  52. Figure 6: Variety of chair designs, https://kitkemp.com/a-brief-history-of-chairs/
  53. Figure 7: PUBG Battlegrounds, Maps, Gallery. https://pubg.com/en/game-info/maps/erangel