Journals / Journal for the Interdisciplinary Art and Education / 2026 / Volume: 6 Issue: 3

Tangible cultural heritage examples from Konya Hacı Fettah Cemetery: a study on the writing and form features of gravestones

Hatice Ünlerşen(NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0925-8564
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All the gravestones examined are headstones, with no footstones found in situ.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Gravestones are extremely important, both artistically and as historical documents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Historical gravestones on islands 101, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, and 116 in the cemetery were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All the gravestones examined are headstones, with no footstones found in situ.
🔬Design:Review Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cultural Heritage · Gravestone · Epigraphy

Abstract

Gravestones are extremely important, both artistically and as historical documents. Tombstone culture has persisted in Turkish-Islamic art from the Karakhanids to the Ottomans. Gravestones, which have a three-dimensional feature, are not only a personal structure but also have a social place. Information or an ornamental element on a tombstone sheds light on the art, socio-cultural situation, history, economy, and important events of the period, like a projector. Each tombstone of such importance is put under scrutiny, with none of it being overlooked. Since Hacı Fettah Cemetery is vast, areas that have not been studied sufficiently were included in the scope of the research. Historical gravestones on islands 101, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, and 116 in the cemetery were examined. The examined gravestones are 3 on the 101st island, 4 on the 102nd island, 5 on the 104th island, 1 on the 106th island, 3 on the 108th island, 1 on the 110th island, and 2 on the 116th island. A total of 19 tombstones on these islands were photographed. The width, length, and thickness measurements of the gravestones were taken. The inscription texts of the stones were written and recorded in both Ottoman Turkish and modern Turkish. The content of the inscriptions was analyzed. The names of dynasties, titles, hometowns, professions, and details of death in the inscription texts on the tombstone have been identified. These dynasty names extracted from the inscriptions are significant in terms of shedding light on past periods and providing information to subsequent generations. The gravestones were evaluated in terms of material, technique, form, and decoration. All the gravestones examined are headstones, with no footstones found in situ.

Özet

Gravestones are extremely important, both artistically and as historical documents. Tombstone culture has persisted in Turkish-Islamic art from the Karakhanids to the Ottomans. Gravestones, which have a three-dimensional feature, are not only a personal structure but also have a social place. Information or an ornamental element on a tombstone sheds light on the art, socio-cultural situation, history, economy, and important events of the period. Each tombstone of such importance is put under scrutiny, with none of it being overlooked. Since Hacı Fettah Cemetery is vast, areas that have not been studied sufficiently were included in the scope of the research. Historical gravestones on islands 101, 102, 104, 106, 108, 110, and 116 in the cemetery were examined. The examined gravestones are 3 on the 101st island, 4 on the 102nd island, 5 on the 104th island, 1 on the 106th island, 3 on the 108th island, 1 on the 110th island, and 2 on the 116th island. The study adopts an on-site observational approach supported by photographic documentation and physical measurement. The analysis is structured under the headings of Artifact Review, Evaluation, and Conclusion, following a chronological and thematic classification. A total of 19 tombstones on these islands were photographed. The width, length, and thickness measurements of the gravestones were taken. The inscription texts of the stones were written and recorded in both Ottoman Turkish and modern Turkish. The content of the inscriptions was analyzed. The names of dynasties, titles, hometowns, professions, and details of death in the inscription texts on the tombstone have been identified. These dynasty names extracted from the inscriptions are significant in terms of shedding light on past periods and providing information to subsequent generations. The gravestones were evaluated in terms of material, technique, form, and decoration. All the gravestones examined are headstones, with no footstones found in situ.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ünlerşen, H. (2025). Tangible cultural heritage examples from Konya Hacı Fettah Cemetery: a study on the writing and form features of gravestones. Journal for the Interdisciplinary Art and Education, Volume: 6 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16948042

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bastaban, Ü. (2024). Kolektif farkındalığın geliştirilmesinde sanatın rolü (The Role of Art in Developing Collective Awareness). Uluslararası İletişim ve Sanat Dergisi, 11, 172–192.
  2. Berk, S. (2006). Zeytinburnu’nun tarihi mezar taşları: Zamanı aşan taşlar (The Historical Tombstones of Zeytinburnu: Stones Beyond Time). Zeytinburnu Belediyesi.
  3. Bozkurt, N. (2004). Mezarlık (Cemetery). In İslam Ansiklopedisi (Vol. 29, pp. 519–522).
  4. Çal, H. (1999). İstanbul Eyüp’teki erkek mezar taşlarında başlıklar (Headgear on Male Tombstones in Eyüp, Istanbul). In Tarihi Kültürü ve Sanatıyla III. Eyüp Sultan Sempozyumu Tebliğler (pp. 206–225).
  5. Çetinaslan, M. (2014). Taşların dili: İnegöl mezarlıkları ve mezar taşları (The Language of Stones: Cemeteries and Tombstones in İnegöl). İnegöl Belediyesi.
  6. Diyarbekirli, N. (1997). Türklerde mezar yapısı ve defin merasimleri (Grave Structures and Funeral Rituals among Turks). Türk Kültürü Araştırmaları, 28(1–2), 53–62.
  7. Güzel, E. (2016). Osmanlı erkek mezar taşlarında serpuş biçimleri (Headgear Forms on Ottoman Male Tombstones) [Master’s thesis, Süleyman Demirel University].
  8. Hanoğlu, C. (2015). Batılılaşma dönemi Rize mezar taşları (Tombstones from the Westernization Period in Rize) [Master’s thesis, Atatürk University].
  9. Kara, H., & Şerife, D. (2005). Konya mezarlıkları ve mezar taşları (Cemeteries and Tombstones of Konya). Meram Belediyesi Kültür Yayınları.
  10. Karaçağ, D. (1994). Bursa’daki 14–15. yüzyıl mezar taşları (14th–15th Century Tombstones in Bursa).
  11. Karamağaralı, B. (1992). Ahlat mezar taşları (Ahlat Tombstones). Kültür Bakanlığı.
  12. Kubbealtı Lugatı. (n.d.). Şahide. Retrieved May 9, 2024, from http://www.lugatim.com/s/%C5%9Fahide
  13. The Qur’an. (n.d.). Al-Ma’idah 5:31. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı.
  14. Laqueur, H. P. (1997). Hüve’l Baki: İstanbul’da Osmanlı mezarlıkları ve mezar taşları (Huwa al-Baqi: Ottoman Cemeteries and Tombstones in Istanbul) (S. Dilidüzgün, Trans.).
  15. Mezarlık Bilgi Sistemi. (2024, May 5). Konya cemetery database. https://konmeb.konya.bel.tr/#!/App/Mezarliklar
  16. Ünlerşen, H. (2023). Karaman cami hazirelerinde ve Karaman Müzesi’nde bulunan mezar taşları (Tombstones in Mosque Courtyards and the Museum of Karaman) [Doctoral dissertation, Sosyal Bilgiler Enstitüsü].