Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Multiparametric MRI of rectal cancer—repeatability of quantitative data: a feasibility study

Pages
87–94
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

New studies with larger patient groups are needed to validate the role of multiparametric MRI.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to analyze the repeatability of quantitative multiparametric rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters with different measurement techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS All examinations were performed with 3 T MRI system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:New studies with larger patient groups are needed to validate the role of multiparametric MRI.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to analyze the repeatability of quantitative multiparametric rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters with different measurement techniques. METHODS All examinations were performed with 3 T MRI system. In addition to routine sequences for rectal cancer imaging protocol, small field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging and perfusion sequences were acquired in each patient. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was used for diffusion analysis and ktrans was used for perfusion analysis. Three different methods were used in measurement of these parameters; measurements were performed twice by one radiologist for intraobserver and separately by three radiologists for interobserver variability analysis. ADC was measured by the lowest value, the value at maximum wall thickness, and freehand techniques. Ktrans was measured at the slice with maximum wall thickness, by freehand drawn region of interest (ROI), and at the dark red spot with maximum value. RESULTS A total of 30 patients with biopsy-proven rectal adenocarcinoma were included in the study. The mean values of the parameters measured by the first radiologist on the first and second measurements were as follows: mean lowest ADC, 721.31±147.18 mm2 /s and 718.96±135.71 mm2 /s; mean ADC value on the slice with maximum wall thickness, 829.90±144.24 mm2/s and 829.48±149.23 mm2 /s; mean ADC value measured by freehand ROI on the slice with maximum wall thickness, 846.56±136.31 mm2/s and 848.23±144.15 mm2/s; mean ktrans value on the slice with maximum wall thickness, 0.219±0.080 and 0.214±0.074; mean ktrans by freehand ROI technique (including as much tumoral tissue as possible), 0.208±0.074 and 0.207±0.069; mean ktrans measured from the dark red foci, 0.308±0.109 and 0.311±0.105. Intraobserver agreement was very good among diffusion and perfusion parameters obtained with all three measurement techniques. Interobserver agreement was very good, except for one of the measurement techniques. As far as interobserver variability is considered, only ADC value measured on the slice with maximum wall thickness differed significantly. CONCLUSION Multiparametric MRI of rectum, using ADC as the diffusion and ktrans as the perfusion parameter is a repeatable technique. This technique may potentially be used in prediction and evaluation of neoadjuvant treatment response. New studies with larger patient groups are needed to validate the role of multiparametric MRI.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRSES, B., ALTINMAKAS, E., BÖGE, M., AYGÜN, M. S., BAYRAM, O., BALIK, E. (2020). Multiparametric MRI of rectal cancer—repeatability of quantitative data: a feasibility study. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 87–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/150348

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Blazic IM, Campbell NM, Gollub MJ. MRI for evaluation of treatment response in rectal cancer. Br J Radiol 2016
  2. 20150964. [CrossRef] 2. Balyasnikova S, Brown G. Imaging advances in colorectal cancer. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 2016
  3. 162–169. [CrossRef] 3. Jhaveri KS, Hosseini-Nik H. MRI of rectal cancer: an overview and update on recent advances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015
  4. W42–55. [CrossRef] 4. Hötker AM, Garcia-Aguilar J, Gollub MJ. Multiparametric MRI of rectal cancer in the assessment of response to therapy: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2014
  5. 790–799. [CrossRef] 5. Pham TT, Liney G, Wong K, et al. Study protocol: multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for therapeutic response prediction in rectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2017
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Park MJ, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Jang KM, Rhim H. Locally advanced rectal cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting tumor clearance of the mesorectal fascia after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Radiology 2011
  7. 771–780. [CrossRef] 7. Engin G, Sharifov R, Güral Z, et al. Can diffusion-weighted MRI determine complete responders after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer? Diagn Interv Radiol 2012
  8. 574–581. [CrossRef] 8. Balyasnikova S, Brown G. Optimal imaging strategies for rectal cancer staging and ongoing management. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2016
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Attenberger UI, Pilz LR, Morelli JN, et al. Multi-parametric MRI of rectal cancer - do quantitative functional MR measurements correlate with radiologic and pathologic tumor stages? Eur J Radiol 2014
  10. 1036–1043. [CrossRef] 10. Lambregts DMJ, Delli Pizzi A, Lahaye MJ, et al. A pattern-based approach combining tumor morphology on MRI with distinct patterns on diffusion-weighted imaging to assess response of rectal tumors after chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 2018
  11. 328–337. [CrossRef] 11. Delli Pizzi A, Cianci R, Genovesi D, et al. Performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T for early assessment of tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Abdom Radiol 2018
  12. 2221–2230. [CrossRef] 12. Hötker AM, Tarlinton L, Mazaheri Y, et al. Multiparametric MRI in the assessment of response of rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A comparison of morphological, volumetric and functional MRI parameters. Eur Radiol 2016
  13. 4303–4312. [CrossRef] 13. Gürses B, Böge M, Altınma