Journals / Central Bank Review / 2010 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Modelling the daily currency in circulation in Turkey

Pages
29–46
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that the forecasting performance of the model is better than the expert judgments both in the short-term and the long-term.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main focus of this paper is to model the daily series of currency in circulation in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The currency in circulation is one of the most significant factors influencing the liquidity of the Turkish banking system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that the forecasting performance of the model is better than the expert judgments both in the short-term and the long-term.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main focus of this paper is to model the daily series of currency in circulation in Turkey. The currency in circulation is one of the most significant factors influencing the liquidity of the Turkish banking system. Therefore, the amount of currency in circulation has to be forecasted as accurately as possible. The currency in circulation displays an increasing long-term trend and strong seasonal factors which can be forecasted. This paper introduces the ARIMA-based approach to model seasonality in daily time series and evaluates the forecasting performance of the model. The results indicate that the forecasting performance of the model is better than the expert judgments both in the short-term and the long-term.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜLER, H., TALASLI, A. (2010). Modelling the daily currency in circulation in Turkey. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 29–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/150237

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Baumol, W. J. (1952) "The Transactions Demand for Cash: An Inventory Theoretic Approach" Quarterly Journal of Economics, DXVI, 4, 545-556.
  2. Bell, W. R. and S. C. Hillmer (1984) "Modeling Time Series With Calendar Variation" Journal of the American Statistical Association, DXXVIII, 526-534.
  3. Bollerslev, T. (1986) "Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity" Journal of Econometrics. XXXI, 307 - 327. Box, G. E. P. and G. M. Jenkins (1976) Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. Holden-Day, San Francisco. Cabrero, G. Camba-Mendez, A. Hirsch, F. Nieto (2002) "Modelling the Daily Banknotes in the Context of the Liquidity Management of the European Central Bank". European Central Bank Working Paper No. 142. Caporale, G.M., Ntantamis, C., Pantelidis, T. and Pittis, N. (2005) "The BDS test as a test for adequacy of a GARCH (1,1) specification: a Monte Carlo study" Journal of Financial Econometrics, 3(2), 282-309.
  4. Franses, P. H. (2004)
  5. Forecasting Seasonal Time Series, Econometric Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam. Friedman, M. (1956) The Quantity Theory of Money- A Restatement, Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  6. Jadhav, N. (1994)
  7. Monetary Economics for India, Macmillan India, New Delhi. Palanivel, T. and Klein, L.R. (1999) "An econometric model for India with emphasis on the monetary sector" The Developing Economies, 275-336.
  8. Stavreski, Z. (1998) "Currency In Circulation" National Bank of Republic of Macedonia. Working Paper No. 1. Tobin, J. (1956) "The Interest Elasticity of Transactions Demand for Cash" Review of Economics and Statistics, XXXYHI, 3, 241-247.