Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Transhiatal and Transthoracic Approaches in Esophageal Cancer Surgery

Pages
66–76
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We believe that these results are due to the low number of patients in the study, the fact that more experienced surgeons had performed THE in the first 4 years, and that esophagectomy cases were not performed by a single surgical team in our clinic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND/AIMS We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of transthoracic and transhiatal surgical approaches for esophageal cancer in our clinic.
📊
Key Findings & Data:MATERIAL and METHODS The records of patients who underwent curative resection for esophageal cancer between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We believe that these results are due to the low number of patients in the study, the fact that more experienced surgeons had performed THE in the first 4 years, and that esophagectomy cases were not performed by a single surgical team in our clinic.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

BACKGROUND/AIMS We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of transthoracic and transhiatal surgical approaches for esophageal cancer in our clinic. MATERIAL and METHODS The records of patients who underwent curative resection for esophageal cancer between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach: Group 1, transhiatal esophagectomy (THE); and Group 2, transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE). Demographics, preoperative stages, intraoperative findings, postoperative morbidity, mortality, and mean survival were compared. RESULTS Group 1 (THE) had 11 patients and Group 2 (TTE) had 19 patients. The groups were similar in terms of age, sex, and preoperative stage (p=0.5). Surgery duration (p=0.002) and the number of dissected lymph nodes (p=0.048) were significantly higher in the TTE group, but intraoperative blood loss (p=0.801), postoperative hospital stay (p=0.414), postoperative complication rates (p=0.734), postoperative mortality (p=0.393), and mean survival time (p=0.164) were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION Comparing the TTE and THE surgical techniques performed for esophageal cancer in our clinic, the surgery time was longer for TTE, which allowed for more lymph node dissection; however, TTE showed similar morbidity and mortality rates as THE, and the type of surgical approach did not affect postoperative mortality, major morbidity rates, anastomosis complications, length of hospital stay, or survival time. We believe that these results are due to the low number of patients in the study, the fact that more experienced surgeons had performed THE in the first 4 years, and that esophagectomy cases were not performed by a single surgical team in our clinic.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALAV, O., TOPAL, U., YAVUZ, B., DALCI, K. (2020). Comparison of Transhiatal and Transthoracic Approaches in Esophageal Cancer Surgery. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 66–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/150201

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Arnold M, Soerjomataram I, Ferlay J, Forman D. Global incidence of oesophageal cancer by histological subtype in 2012. Gut 2015
  2. 64(3): 381-7. [CrossRef] 2. Smyth EC, Lagergren J, Fitzgerald RC, Lordick F, Shah MA, Lagergren P, et al. Oesophageal cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017
  3. 17048. [CrossRef] 3. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014
  4. 64(1): 9-29. [CrossRef] 4. Boshier PR, Anderson O, Hanna GB. Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2011
  5. 254(6): 894-906. [CrossRef] 5. Lewis I. The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus: with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third. Br J Surg 1946
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Turner GG. Excision of thoracic esophagus for carcinoma with construction of extrathoracic gullet. Lancet 1933
  7. 222(5754): 1315-16. [CrossRef] 7. Orringer MB, Sloan H. Esophagectomy without thoracotomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978
  8. 76(5): 643-54. [CrossRef] 8. Heger P, Blank S, Gooßen K, Nienhüser H, Diener MK, Ulrich A, et al. Thoracoabdominal versus transhiatal surgical approaches for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Archives Surg 2019
  9. 404(1): 103-13. [CrossRef] 9. Wei MT, Zhang YC, Deng XB, Yang TH, He YZ, Wang ZQ. Transthoracic vs transhiatal surgery for cancer of the esophagogastric junction: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014
  10. 20(29): 10183-92. [CrossRef] 10. Khullar OV, Jiang R, Force SD, Pickens A, Sancheti MS, Ward K et al. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus: A value-based comparison. J Surg Oncol 2015
  11. 112(5): 517-23. [CrossRef] 11. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers version 2. NCCN Clin Pract Guidel Oncol 2018. 12. Stahl M, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Cervantes A, Arnold D. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2013
  12. 24 Suppl 6: vi51-6. [CrossRef] 13. Chang AC, Ji H, Birkmeyer NJ, Orringer MB, Birkmeyer J. Outcomes after transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2008
  13. 85(2): 424-29. [CrossRef] 14. Papenfuss WA, Kukar M, Attwood K, Kakarla VR, Chousleb S, Hochwald SN, et al. Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A 2005–2011 NSQIP comparison of modern multicenter resul