SavedAdd your journal

Journals / InTraders Uluslararası Ticaret Akademik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 1

How Does ESG Uncertainty Affect Green Finance: The Top ESG Performing Countries

Çisem Bektur(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCES)0000-0001-9220-5932
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study is the first to directly examine the empirical relationship between country-based ESGUI and green finance, focusing on the group of countries with the highest ESG scores.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In light of the current climate crisis, sustainable development has become a strategic element of economic policies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The analysis covers seven countries (Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, and Sweden) that scored 85 points or higher in the ISESG 2025 global ESG ranking and covers the period 2002–2021.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study is the first to directly examine the empirical relationship between country-based ESGUI and green finance, focusing on the group of countries with the highest ESG scores.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Green Finance · ESG-Related Uncertainty Index (ESGUI) · Inflation

Abstract

In light of the current climate crisis, sustainable development has become a strategic element of economic policies. This has led to the step of green finance instead of traditional financial methods, adopting an approach based on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards. In this context, this study examines the effects of environmental protection (ESG) on green finance. The analysis covers seven countries (Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, and Sweden) that scored 85 points or higher in the ISESG 2025 global ESG ranking and covers the period 2002–2021. The cointegration test of Westerlund and Edgerton is utilized in the study. Long-term coefficients are then obtained through AMG and rCCE estimators. Green finance is measured by the share of environmental protection expenditures in GDP, while ESG uncertainty (ESGUI), inflation, and financial development are included in the model. The analysis results reveal a long-term relationship between the variables and significant heterogeneity among countries. The findings display that ESG uncertainty negatively affects green finance in Ireland and Sweden, but positively affects it in Belgium. Inflation has a negative impact on green finance only in Germany, while the supportive role of financial development is found in Ireland and the Netherlands. Therefore, analyses reveal that high ESG performance alone does not guarantee the stability of green finance, and that ESG uncertainty plays a decisive role in this process. This study is the first to directly examine the empirical relationship between country-based ESGUI and green finance, focusing on the group of countries with the highest ESG scores.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bektur, Ç. (2026). How Does ESG Uncertainty Affect Green Finance: The Top ESG Performing Countries. InTraders Uluslararası Ticaret Akademik Dergisi, Volume: 9 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.55065/intraders.1873038

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (54)

  1. Aguila, N., & Wullweber, J. (2024). Greener and cheaper: Green monetary policy in the era of inflation and high interest rates. Eurasian Economic Review, 14(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-024-00266-y
  2. Ahn, S. K. (1993). Some tests for unit roots in autoregressive-integrated-moving average models with deterministic trends. Biometrika 80(4), 855–868. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/80.4.855
  3. Ajour El Zein, S., Consolacion-Segura, C., & Huertas-Garcia, R. (2020). The role of sustainability in brand equity value in the financial sector. Sustainability, 12(1), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010254
  4. Akadiri, S. S., & Özkan, O. (2026). Navigating uncertainty: the impact of ESG factors on clean energy markets and investment dynamics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 33(1), 1270-1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70227
  5. Aleknevičienė, V., Staugaitis, A. J., Gudaitienė, R., & Bendoraitytė, A. (2025). How do the uncertainties affect the connectedness between the green bond market and conventional financial markets? Evidence from the Russian-Ukrainian war. Green Finance, 7(4), 634. https://doi.org/10.3934/GF.2025024
  6. Al-Mulali, U., Saboori, B., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy, 76, 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.019
  7. Amsler, C., & Lee, J. (1995). An LM test for a unit root in the presence of a structural change. Econometric Theory, 11(2), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646660000921X
  8. Arhinful, R., Mensah, L., Amin, H. I. M., Obeng, H. A., & Gyamfi, B. A. (2025). The strategic role of sustainable finance in corporate reputation: A signaling theory perspective. Sustainability, 17(11), 5002. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115002
  9. Becker R., Enders W., & Lee, J. (2006). A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x
  10. Berk, N., Sarılı, S., & Yıldırtan, D. C. (2023). Do green bonds perform better than conventional bonds?. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 261, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.2495/ESUS230111
  11. Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
  12. Chen, X., & Chen, Z. (2021). Can green finance development reduce carbon emissions? Empirical evidence from 30 Chinese provinces. Sustainability, 13(21), 12137. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112137
  13. Chen, S. S., & Lin, T. Y. (2024). Monetary policy and renewable energy production. Energy Economics, 132, 107495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107495
  14. Chen, P., & Yue, C. (2024). Construction of green finance’s ESG evaluation system for rural innovation and entrepreneurship. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 19, 2646-2655. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctae209
  15. Czipf, C. (2025). The impact of changing energy prices, interest rates, and investment costs on the net present value and internal rate of return for alternative energy projects. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00921-7
  16. Das, N., Pradhan, R. P., & Janjua, L. R. (2025). Climate commitments and market risks: Analysing the drivers of sovereign green bond issuance in India. Finance Research Letters, 90 109365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.109365
  17. Dobnik, F. (2011). Energy consumption and economic growth revisited: Structural breaks and cross-section dependence. Ruhr Economic Papers, (No. 303). https://hdl.handle.net/10419/61681
  18. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
  19. Dou, J., Su, C. W., Li, W., & Dou, J. (2025). Green finance and artificial intelligence: Catalysts for promoting sustainability?. Economic Analysis and Policy, 88, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2025.08.037
  20. Dutordoir, M., Li, S., & Neto, J. Q. F. (2024). Issuer motivations for corporate green bond offerings. British Journal of Management, 35(2), 952–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12747
  21. Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2010). Productivity analysis in global manufacturing production. Discussion Paper 515, Department of Economics, University of Oxford. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:ea831625-9014-40ec-abc5-516ecfbd2118
  22. European Commission (2020). Finance and the Green Deal. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/finance-and-green-deal_en (Accessed March 30, 2026).
  23. Ergün, H. O. (2024). Yeşil finansın belirleyicileri: Yeşil tahvil üzerine bir araştırma. 6. International Liberty Interdisciplinary Studies Conference, November 29-30, 2024, New York. https://www.libertyacademicbooks.com/libertyconference
  24. Farooq, F., Sajid, M., Faheem, M., & Khan, K. H. (2024). Evaluating the influence of green growth, foreign direct investment and financial development towards sustainable environment: Evidence by green finance theory. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 13(2), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.61506/01.00297
  25. Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, P. M., Ferreira, J. J., & Hughes, M. (2021). Green growth versus economic growth: Do sustainable technology transfer and innovations lead to an imperfect choice?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4), 2021–2037. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2730
  26. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.
  27. Handler, B., & Shandy, M. (2023). Rising costs' impact on renewable power generation. https://doi.org/10.25676/11124/177127
  28. ISESG. (2025). Global ESG ranking 2025. https://www.isesg.org/global-esg-ranking-2025. (Accessed January 20, 2026).
  29. Juodis, A. (2022). A regularization approach to common correlated effects estimation. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 37(4), 788–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2899
  30. Kathan, M. C., Utz, S., Dorfleitner, G., Eckberg, J., & Chmel, L. (2025). What you see is not what you get: ESG scores and greenwashing risk. Finance Research Letters, 74, 106710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106710
  31. Khan, N., Karim, S., Chan, L. F., & She, L. (2024). Green horizons: Overcoming political risks with strategic environmental management and financial innovation. Journal of Environmental Management, 368, 122224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122224
  32. Köycü, E. (2025). Possible effects of uncertainty factors on green bond returns. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (68), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1611428
  33. Le, T. N. L., Goodell, J. W., Khalfaoui, R., Abakah, E. J. A. & Doğan, B. (2023). The impact of economic outlook on green finance: Insights from linkages between green and inflation-indexed bonds. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(3), 6507–6538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04153-5
  34. Lee, M. T., & Raschke, R. L. (2023). Stakeholder legitimacy in firm greening and financial performance: What about greenwashing temptations?. Journal of Business Research, 155, 113393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113393
  35. Liu, Q., Luo, X., & Su, M. (2024). Analysis of the "greenwashing" phenomenon in the ESG investment environment. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 40, 1161–1170. https://doi.org/10.54097/s5zf4q16
  36. Luo, K., Peng, L., & Zhou, F. (2026). Sustainability uncertainty and the dynamics of green asset markets. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2026.100999
  37. Mustafa, H., Chen, C., Atqa, A. A., Li, X., Qin, Z., Alhasnawi, M. Y., & Lin, Z. (2025). The influence of ESG performance on banking credit decisions: Empirical from highly polluting enterprises in China. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 254. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00672-x
  38. Nawaz, A., & Su, C. W. (2026). Sustainability uncertainty and the fragility of green finance: Bootstrap rolling-window and quantile-on-quantile evidence from green bond. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting/Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2026.2619316
  39. Nazlıoğlu, S., & Karul, C. (2017). A panel stationarity test with gradual structural shifts: Re-investigate the international commodity price shocks. Economic Modelling, 61, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.12.003
  40. OECD. (2020). ESG investing: Practices, progress, and challenges. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2020/09/esg-investing-practices-progress-and-challenges_8a73d683/b4f71091-en.pdf (Accessed December 17, 2025).
  41. Ongan, S., Gocer, I., & Işık, C. (2025). Introducing the new ESG‐based sustainability uncertainty index (ESGUI). Sustainable Development, 33(3), 4457-4467. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3351
  42. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229; IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240.
  43. Pesaran, M. H., & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010
  44. Rosa, S. M. (2025). Green monetary policy measures and central bank mandates: A comparative political economy analysis. Politics and Governance, 13, 8919. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8919
  45. Schmidt, P., & Phillips, P. C. (1992). LM tests for a unit root in the presence of deterministic trends. Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics, 54(3), 257–287.
  46. Shen, Y. (2025). The synergy between ESG and green finance. Proceedings of ICEMGD 2025 Symposium: Innovating in Management and Economic Development. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.LH25192
  47. Swamy, P. A. (1970). Efficient inference in a random coefficient regression model. Econometrica 38(2), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913012
  48. Sun, G., Sulemana, I., & Agyemang, A. O. (2025). Examining the impact of stakeholders' pressures on sustainability practices. Management Decision, 63 (11), 3967–3995. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2023-1008
  49. Tron, A., Franceschi, L. F., Colantoni, F., & Paolone, F. (2025). ESG dynamics: Assessing the link between sustainability practices and the cost of capital. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 32(4), 5038–5053. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.3231
  50. Wang, S., & Wang, D. (2022). Exploring the relationship between ESG performance and green bond issuance. Frontiers in public health, 10, 897577. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.897577
  51. Wang, T., Chang, H., & Liu, L. (2026). Sustainability Uncertainty and Green Asset Returns: Implications for Financial Market Stability. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2026.2614999
  52. Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. L. (2008). A simple test for cointegration in dependent panels with structural breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(5), 665–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2008.00513.x
  53. Zhang, X., & Zhang, Z. (2025). ESG performance and "Greenwashing": An analysis of the mediating effect of supply chain finance. Finance Research Letters, 89, 109255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.109255
  54. Zheng, J., Jiang, Y., Cui, Y., & Shen, Y. (2023). Green bond issuance and corporate ESG performance: Steps toward green and low-carbon development. Research in International Business and Finance, 66, 102007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102007