Journals / International Journal of Science Letters / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Trust in Childbirth Scale: a scale development study

Fatma Sayiner(ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9287-989X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The scale can be used to measure the feeling of trust during childbirth.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Childbirth is significant for women and their partners as it is an enriching experience for their lives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study included 335 pregnant or postpartum women who applied to a state hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The scale can be used to measure the feeling of trust during childbirth.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Birth · Midwifery · Trust

Abstract

Aim: Childbirth is significant for women and their partners as it is an enriching experience for their lives. Feeling of trust and security is a crucial part of a positive birthing experience for women, and that feeling of trust influences mothers' behaviors and decisions during pregnancy, childbirth, and the early postpartum period. This study aimed to development a scale to assess women’s feeling of trust in childbirth at pregnancy or the postpartum period. Methods: This study included 335 pregnant or postpartum women who applied to a state hospital. The adequacy of the sample size was assessed using Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) analysis, and the assumption of multivariate normal distribution of the data was evaluated with Bartlett’s test of sphericity. The researchers generated an initial pool of 63 items. The items were assessed for linguistic clarity and comprehensibility. Expert opinions were obtained from seven faculty members. Item, validity and reliability analyses were performed, and the scale was finalized with 17 items. Results: Exploratory factor analysis indicated a single-factor structure for the 17 items scale, explaining 73.668% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale is 0.976. The scale has a high degree of reliability. Conclusion: Since there is no direct scale to measure feelings of trust during childbirth, a direct comparison is not possible. However, this scale provides insight into the level of trust women experience during childbirth. The scale can be used to measure the feeling of trust during childbirth.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öztürk, D. M., Sayiner, F., Çömezoğlu, E., Yücel, M. (2026). Trust in Childbirth Scale: a scale development study. International Journal of Science Letters, Volume: 8 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.38058/ijsl.1938378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2019). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (26. bs.). Pegem Akademi.
  2. De Vries, R. G. (2011). Midwives, obstetrics, fear, and trust: A four-part invention. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 21(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.21.1.9
  3. Karlström, A., Nystedt, A., & Hildingsson, I. (2015). The meaning of a very positive birth experience: Focus groups discussions with women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15, 251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0683-0
  4. National Maternity Review. (2015). Better births:Improving outcomes of maternity services in England.
  5. NHS Patient Survey Programme. (2018). Survey of women’s experiences of maternity care: Statistical release.
  6. Sjöblom, I., Idvall, E., Lindgren, H., & Nordic Homebirth Research Group. (2014). Creating a safe haven women’s experiences of the midwife’s professional skills during planned home birth in four Nordic countries. Birth, 41, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12092
  7. Şengül, H. & Bulut, A. (2020). Tıbbi Güvensizlik Ölçeği ve Doktora Güven Ölçeğinin Türkçe Geçerlik Güvenirlik Çalışması, International Social Sciences Studies Journal, (e-ISSN:2587-1587) Vol:6 (62), 1956-1964. https://doi.org/10.26449/sssj.2323
  8. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). Harper Collins.
  9. Çeber Turfan, E., & Yıldırım, C. (2026). Kadın-sağlık çalışanı ilişkisi: Güven, iletişim ve empati. F. D. Sayıner, F. Bay ve E. Çömezoğlu (Ed.), Saygılı annelik bakımı (ss. 177–184). Akademisyen Yayınevi. https://doi.org/10.37609/akya.4139.c6900
  10. Werner-Bierwisch, T., Pinkert, C., Niessen, K., Metzing, S., & Hellmers, C. (2018). Mothers' and fathers' sense of security in the context of pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period: an integrative literature review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 18(1), 473. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-2096-3
  11. Yeşilyurt, S., & Çapraz, C. (2018). A road map for the content validity used in scale development studies. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.297741