Journals / Avrasya Etüdleri / 2014 / Sayı: 45

The Non-Communist Development Strategy in the Silk Road Economies: The Analysis of Economic Development According to Approaches of Rostow and Porter

İpek Yolu Ekonomilerinde Komünist Olmayan Gelişme Stratejisi: İpek Yolu'nda Rostow ve Porter Yaklaşımlarına Göre İktisadi Gelişmenin Analizi

Pages
2–33
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In result, according to approaches of Rostow and Porter, The Silk Road economies are in path to development by getting rid of several problems of post-communist process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The article analyzes performances of economic development of Silk Road economies during the period of the post-communist process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The 47,4% of Silk Road economies is in stage of the take-off according to Rostow stages of economic growth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In result, according to approaches of Rostow and Porter, The Silk Road economies are in path to development by getting rid of several problems of post-communist process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The article analyzes performances of economic development of Silk Road economies during the period of the post-communist process. The analysis is based on approaches of Rostow and Porter. The 47,4% of Silk Road economies is in stage of the take-off according to Rostow stages of economic growth. The twenty-one percent of countries is in the preconditions for take-off. Korea and Japan of Silk Road economies can be arrived at the age of high mass consumption. Turkey, Russia and Kazakhstan just arrived the stage of maturity. Tajikistan and Afghanistan didn't still pass the stage of traditional society. Japan and Korea have high competitive power and ability of innovative in the Competiveness Ranking based on Porter approach. Although China and India rank as among top of world five economies, they already couldn't arrived innovation stage. In result, according to approaches of Rostow and Porter, The Silk Road economies are in path to development by getting rid of several problems of post-communist process.

Özet

Bu makale, İpek Yolu ekonomilerinin komünizm sonrası dönemdeki iktisadi gelişme performansını analiz etmektedir. Bu analiz, Rostow ve Porter yaklaşımlarını esas alarak yapılmaktadır. Rostow'un ekonomik gelişme aşamalarına göre, İpek Yolu ekonomilerinin önemli bir kısmı (%47,4) harekete geçiş, ülkelerin %21'i ise kalkışa hazırlık aşamasındadır. İpek Yolu ekonomilerinden Japonya ve Kore ekonomik gelişme safhalarının tamamını geçmiştir. Tacikistan ve Afganistan henüz geleneksel toplum aşamasını geçememiştir. Türkiye ve Kazakistan ise olgunluk safhasına ulaşabilmiştir. Porter yaklaşımını esas alan rekabet sıralamasında, Japonya ve Kore yüksek rekabet ve yenilik yapma gücüne sahiptir. İpek Yolu ekonomileri arasında Rusya, Türkiye ve Kazakistan ise yenilik safhasına geçebilecek kapasiteye sahiptir. Çin ve Hindistan dünyanın en büyük beş ekonomisi arasında yer almasına rağmen, henüz yenilik aşamasına geçememiştir. Sonuçta, Rostow ve Porter yaklaşımlarına göre İpek Yolu ekonomileri çoğunlukla komünist toplum aşamasındaki sorunlarından hızla sıyrılarak gelişme yolundadırlar.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRAN, M. (2014). The Non-Communist Development Strategy in the Silk Road Economies: The Analysis of Economic Development According to Approaches of Rostow and Porter. Avrasya Etüdleri, Sayı: 45, 2–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/149708

References (15)

  1. Bhala, Kara Tan. "Patterns of Asian growth", Asian Affairs, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1998, pp. 39-53.
  2. Boettka, Peter J. Why Prestroyka Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation, Routledge, London UK, 1993.
  3. Brezinski, Zbigniew. "A geostrategy for Eurasia", www.comw.org/pda/ fulltext/9709brzezinski.html(e.t.05/05/2012)
  4. Brzezinski, Zbigniew. "Post-Communist Nationalism", Foreign Affairs, Vol. 68, No. 5, 1989, pp. 1-25.
  5. Desai, Padma. "Soviet Growth Retardation", The Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Eighth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, May 1996, pp. 175-180.
  6. Dulupçu, Murat.A. Küresel Rekabet Gücü, Türkiye Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme, Nobel Yayınları, Ankara, 2001.
  7. Hunter, Murray. "The Stages of Economic Development from an Opportunity Perspective: Rostow Extended", Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, No. 2, 2012, pp. 52-80. IMF. Regional Economic Outlook Middle East and Central Asia, https:// www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/reo/2014/mcd/eng/pdf/cca0514.pdf Kotler, Philip, Somkid Jatusripitak and Suvit Maesincee. Ulusların Pazarlanması, Ulusal Refahı Oluşturmada Stratejik Bir Yaklaşım, çev. Ahmet Buğdaycı, 2. baskı, İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul, 2005.
  8. Lucy Corkin, Christopher Burke and Martyn Davies. "China's Role in the Development of Africa's Infrastructure", Documents de travail du SAIS dans African Studies, 04-08 (2008).
  9. Porter, Micheal E. "The Competitive Advantage of Nations", Harvard Business Review, March-April 1990, pp. 74-91.
  10. Porter, Micheal E. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, First Pub., the Macmillan Pres L., London, 1990.
  11. Reinert, Erik S. "The Role of the State in Economic Growth", Journal of Economic Studies Vol. 26, No. 4/5, 1999, pp. 268-326.
  12. Rodrik, Dani. "The Past, Present, and Future of Economic Growth", Challenge, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2014, pp. 5-39.
  13. Rostow, Walt Whitman. İktisadi Gelişmenin Merhaleleri, Çev. Erol Güngör, Ötüken Yayınları, İstanbul, 1996. Rostow,Walt Whitman, "The Stages of Economic Growth", The Economic History Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1959, pp. 1-16.
  14. Tisdell, Clem. "Economic Reform and Openness in China: China's Development Policies in the Last 30 Years", Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2009.
  15. Ülgener, Sabri F. Milli Gelir, İstihdam ve İktisadi Büyüme, 7. basım, Der Yayınları, İstanbul, 1991. WEF. The Global Competitiveness Report, 2012, 2013, 2014. WTO. Trade Profile, tat.wto.org/CountryProfile. UNDP, Human Development In