SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy / 2021 / Volume: 6 Issue: 3

SEXUAL ORIENTATION MYTHS: DOES THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION AFFECT SEXUAL ORIENTATION MYTHS?

Hacer Ünver(INONU UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5406-4566
İpek Turan(ADIYAMAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7495-2894
Pages
—
Publication Date
2021-12-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study’s findings are important because they would guide future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: Sexual myths differ from one culture to the next, and one society to the next and they can even differ regionally within the same culture.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted between February and June 2020 at three faculties of a state university in Eastern Anatolia, Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study’s findings are important because they would guide future studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:LGBT · Religion · Sexuality

Abstract

Abstract: Sexual myths differ from one culture to the next, and one society to the next and they can even differ regionally within the same culture. The aim of this study is to determine the sexual orientation myths of the university students studying theology. The study was conducted between February and June 2020 at three faculties of a state university in Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. This descriptive study was conducted with 582 students studying at three faculties. The data were collected by using Personal Information Form, Sexual Orientation Myths Scale. It was determined in the study that there was a statistically significant difference between the sexual orientation myths of the students studying and not studying theology. Advanced analysis revealed that this difference stemmed from the group studying theology. This study revealed that theological education affected sexual orientation myths. This study’s findings are important because they would guide future studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ünver, H., Turan, İ. (2021). SEXUAL ORIENTATION MYTHS: DOES THEOLOGICAL EDUCATION AFFECT SEXUAL ORIENTATION MYTHS?. International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, Volume: 6 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.33457/ijhsrp.974306

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Civil B, Yıldız H. (2010). Male Students' Opinions About Sexual Experience and Social Taboos Related to Sexuality e-Journal of Dokuz Eylül University Nursing Faculty, 3(2):58-64.
  2. Evcili, F. (2019). Sexual Orientation Myhts Scale (SOMS): Development, validity and reliability in Turkey. Perspectives Psychiatric Care. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12371.
  3. Sarıoğlu, E. “Non-Heteronormative Commitments: J.M. Melancholy and Intimacy in Coetzee Self-fiction, ”Fe Magazine 10, no. 1 (2018), 27_41. URL: http://cins.ankara.edu.tr/19_3.pdf
  4. Engin, Ceylan. (2015). LGBT in Turkey: Policies and Experiences. Social Sciences. 4. 838-858. 10.3390/socsci4030838.
  5. Hooghe, M., Dejaeghere, Y., Claes, E., & Quintelier, E. (2010). “Yes, But Suppose Everyone Is Gay?”: The Structure of Attitudes Towards Gay and Lesbian Rights Among Islamic Youth in Belgium. LGBT Youth Magazine, 7 (1), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361650903507916
  6. Boellstorff, T. (2005). Between religion and desire: Being Muslim and gay in Indonesia. American Anthropologist, 107 (4), 575-585. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2005.107.4.575
  7. Wilcox, MM. (2002). When Sheila is a lesbian: Religious individuality among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Christians. Sociology of Religion, 63 (4), 497-513, https://doi.org/10.2307/3712304
  8. Sebastian Jäckle & Georg Wenzelburger (2015) Religion, Religiosity, and the Attitudes Toward Homosexuality—A Multilevel Analysis of 79 Countries, Journal of Homosexuality, 62:2, 207-241, doi: 10.1080/00918369.2014.969071
  9. Örüklü, C., Dağcı, D. G., Çakmak, S. (2021). University Students' Perspectives on Myths of Sexuality and Associated Factors. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences, (13), 71-87. DOI: 10.38079/igusabder.845736
  10. Aker S, Şahin MK, Oğuz G. (2019). Sexual myth beliefs and associated factors in university students. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 13(4):472-480
  11. Fennell R, Grant B. Discussing sexuality in health care: a systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(17‐18):3065‐3076. https://doi.org/10. 1111/jocn.14900
  12. Sarac, L. (2015). Relationships between religiosity level and attitudes toward lesbians and gay men among Turkish university students. Journal of Homosexuality, 62, 481-494. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2014.983386
  13. Harbaugh, E. ve Lindsey, EW ( 2015 ). Attitudes Toward Homosexuality Among Young Adults: Connections to Gender Role Identity, Gender-Typed Activities, and Religiosity Journal of Homosexuality, 62 (8), 1098 - 1125. doi: 10.1080 / 00918369.2015.1021635
  14. Patrick, K., Heywood, W., Simpson, JM, Pitts, MK, Richters, J., Shelley, JM ve Smith, AM ( 2013 ). Demographic Predictors of Consistency and Change in Heterosexuals' Attitudes toward Homosexual Behavior over a Two-Year Period. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 611 - 619. doi: 10.1080 / 00224499.2012.657263
  15. Martyniuk U, Dekker A, Sehner S, Richter‐Appelt H, Briken P. Religiosity, sexual myths, sex taboos, and pornography use: a cross‐ national comparison of Polish and German university students. Cyberpsychol: J Psychosoc Res Cyberspace. 2015;9(2), https://doi.org/ 10.5817/CP2015-2-4
  16. Harbaugh, E. ve Lindsey, EW ( 2015 ). Attitudes Toward Homosexuality Among Young Adults: Connections to Gender Role Identity, Gender-Typed Activities, and Religiosity Journal of Homosexuality, 62 (8), 1098 - 1125. doi: 10.1080 / 00918369.2015.1021635
  17. Patrick, K., Heywood, W., Simpson, JM, Pitts, MK, Richters, J., Shelley, JM ve Smith, AM ( 2013 ). Demographic Predictors of Consistency and Change in Heterosexuals' Attitudes toward Homosexual Behavior over a Two-Year Period. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 611 - 619. doi: 10.1080 / 00224499.2012.657263