SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 1

ASSESSMENT OF THE LEVEL OF RISK PERCEPTIONS AND RELATED PARAMETERS FOR THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Selva Dilan Gölbaşı Koç(Eskisehir Osmangazi University Public Health Department)0000-0002-9567-3544
Selma Metintas(Eskisehir Osmangazi University Public Health Department)0000-0002-5002-5041
Ali Kılınç(Eskisehir Osmangazi University Public Health Department)0000-0002-0577-8570
Sevda Sungur(Eskisehir Osmangazi University Public Health Department)0000-0002-0186-0331
Alaettin Ünsal(Eskisehir Osmangazi University Public Health Department)0000-0001-8353-1605
Didem Arslantas(Eskisehir Osmangazi University Public Health Department)0000-0002-5263-3710
Muhammed Fatih Önsüz(Eskisehir Osmangazi University Public Health Department)0000-0001-7234-3385
Pages
—
Publication Date
2022-04-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

COVID-19 risk perception of individuals should be monitored since it is related to many parameters in epidemic management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:INTRODUCTION: Assessment of risk perception in communities in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic is essential for organizing effective interventions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study aims to determine the level of COVID-19 risk perception and the factors associated with risk perception.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:COVID-19 risk perception of individuals should be monitored since it is related to many parameters in epidemic management.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Risk perception · COVID-19 · risk factors

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of risk perception in communities in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic is essential for organizing effective interventions. The study aims to determine the level of COVID-19 risk perception and the factors associated with risk perception. METHODS: It is a cross-sectional study in which 452 participants, who were employees of Eskisehir Osmangazi University, were included between December-2020 and January-2021. The COVID-19 risk perception level was assessed with nine questions by modifying the COVID-19 Instant Monitoring Turkey protocol study questions. The prepared questionnaire included variables of sociodemographic characteristics, transmission risk status, preparedness, self-efficacy, compliance with protective behaviors, actionism(ineffective protection behavior), and confidence in information sources/tools. The 25th percentile and lower scores were evaluated as having low risk perception. The study data were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The participants had a mean age of 38.51±9.66 years (46.9% females, 53.1% males). The median COVID-19 risk perception score was 42(Interquartile range: 35-50). In this study, the low COVID-19 risk perception frequency was 26.3%. Being 40 years old and older (OR;%95CI: 1.76;1.12-2.76), the low level of compliance with protective behaviors (1.75;1.09-2.76) and low level of confidence in information sources/tools (2.37;1.49-3.78) were predictive for having a low level of risk perception of COVID-19. Those with a low COVID-19 risk perception were more likely to agree that the restrictions being applied were exaggerated (p=0.001). The most trusted sources of information about COVID-19 were the statements of health professionals and official institutions (p<0.001). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: A low-level risk perception was detected in one out of every four people in the study group. COVID-19 risk perception of individuals should be monitored since it is related to many parameters in epidemic management.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koç, S. D. G., Metintas, S., Kılınç, A., Sungur, S., Ünsal, A., Arslantas, D., Önsüz, M. F. (2022). ASSESSMENT OF THE LEVEL OF RISK PERCEPTIONS AND RELATED PARAMETERS FOR THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. International Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, Volume: 7 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.33457/ijhsrp.1053188

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Barrios JM, Hochberg Y. Risk perception through the lens of politics in the time of the covid-19 pandemic. NBER 2020. Report No.: 0898-2937.
  2. Zhong Y, Liu W, Lee T-Y, Zhao H, Ji J. Risk perception, knowledge, information sources and emotional states among COVID-19 patients in Wuhan, China. Nurs Outlook 2021; 69(1):13-21.
  3. Velikonja NK, Erjavec K, Verdenik I, Hussein M, Velikonja VG. Association between preventive behaviour and anxiety at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in Slovenia. SJPH 2020; 60(1):17-24.
  4. Ahorsu DK IV, Lin CY, Timpka T, Broström A, Updegraff JA, Arestedt K, et al. Associations between fear of COVID-19, mental health, and preventive behaviours across pregnant women and husbands: an actor-partner interdependence modelling. Int J Ment Health Addict 2020:1-15.
  5. Yang H, Bin P, He A. Opinions from the epicenter: An online survey of university students in Wuhan amidst the COVID-19 outbreak1. J Chin Gov 2020 Apr 2; 5(2):234-48.
  6. Wise T, Zbozinek TD, Michelini G, Hagan CC, Mobbs D. Changes in risk perception and self-reported protective behaviour during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Royal Society Open Sci 2020; 7(9):200742.
  7. Goodwin R WJ, Tuicomepee A, Suttiwan P, Watakakosol R. Anxiety and public responses to covid-19: Early data from Thailand. J Psychiatr Res 2020; 129:118-21.
  8. Samadipour E, Ghardashi F, Aghaei N. Evaluation of risk perception of Covid-19 disease: A community-based participatory study. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2020:1-8.
  9. COVID-19 Snapshot MOnitoring (COSMO)2020. Available from: https://www.psycharchives.org/handle/20.500.12034/2397.
  10. Karadag F, Aslan S, Budakoglu I, Kucukkarapinar M, Yay A, Ucar O. Turkey COVID-19 Snapshot MOnitoring (COSMO Turkey): Monitoring knowledge, risk perceptions, preventive behaviours, and public trust in the current coronavirus outbreak in Turkey. PsychArchieves 2020.
  11. Rosi A, van Vugt FT, Lecce S, Ceccato I, Vallarino M, Rapisarda F, et al. Risk Perception in a Real-World Situation (COVID-19): How It Changes From 18 to 87 Years Old. Front Psychol 2021; 12:528.
  12. Kucukkarapinar M, Karadag F, Aslan S, Budakoglu I, Ucar O, Yay A, et al. Turkish COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) Wave-1,2,3 (17.07-31.07.2020; 01.08-15.08.2020; 16.08-31.08.2020). PsychArchives 2020.
  13. Peres D, Monteiro J, Almeida M, Ladeira R. Risk perception of COVID-19 among Portuguese healthcare professionals and the general population. J Hosp Infect 2020; 105(3):434-7.
  14. Rubaltelli E, Tedaldi E, Orabona N, Scrimin S. Environmental and psychological variables influencing reactions to the COVID‐19 outbreak. Br J Health Psychol 2020; 25(4):1020-38.
  15. Kuang J, Ashraf S, Das U, Bicchieri C. Awareness, risk perception, and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic in communities of Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Environ Res 2020; 17(19):7177.
  16. Siegrist M, Luchsinger L, Bearth A. The Impact of trust and risk perception on the acceptance of measures to reduce COVID‐19 cases. Risk Anal 2021; 41(5):787-800.
  17. Ye M, Lyu Z. Trust, risk perception, and COVID-19 infections: Evidence from multilevel analyses of combined original dataset in China. Soc Sci Med 2020; 265:113517.
  18. Kucukkarapinar M, Karadag F, Aslan S, Budakoglu I, Yay A, Ucar O. Turkish COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) Wave-1 (17.07-31.07.2020). PsychArchives 2020.
  19. Kamran A, Isazadehfar K, Heydari H, Azgomi RND, Naeim M. Risk perception and adherence to preventive behaviours related to the COVID-19 pandemic: a community-based study applying the health belief model. BJPsych Open. 2021;7(4).
  20. Guastafierro E, Toppo C, Magnani FG, Romano R, Facchini C, Campioni R, et al. Older Adults’ Risk Perception during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Lombardy Region of Italy: A Cross-sectional Survey. J Gerontol Soc Work 2021:1-14.
  21. Pasion R, Paiva TO, Fernandes C, Barbosa F. The AGE effect on protective behaviors during the COVID-19 outbreak: sociodemographic, perceptions and psychological accounts. Front Psychol 2020; 11:2785.
  22. Dryhurst S, Schneider CR, Kerr J, Freeman AL, Recchia G, Van Der Bles AM, et al. Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. J Risk Res 2020; 23(7-8):994-1006.
  23. Yıldırım M, Güler A. Factor analysis of the COVID-19 Perceived Risk Scale: A preliminary study. Death Stud. 2020:1-8.
  24. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability, in Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, eds D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). 1982. pp. 163-89.
  25. Goodwin R WJ, Tuicomepee A, Suttiwan P, Watakakosol R. Anxiety and public responses to covid-19: Early data from Thailand. J Psychiatr Res 2020; 129:118-21.