Journals / Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Advancements in 3D Printing Technology: Applications and Options for Prosthetic Dentistry

Pages
176–182
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, the aim of this review is to study the current status of common additive manufacturing techniques in prosthetic dentistry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The use of additive manufacturing systems in dentistry is becoming a widespread phenomenon.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Additive manufacturing technology is defined as the fabrication of a 3D model or prototype by agglomerating the biomaterials layer by layer in a specific pattern dictated by the computer-aided design software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, the aim of this review is to study the current status of common additive manufacturing techniques in prosthetic dentistry.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The use of additive manufacturing systems in dentistry is becoming a widespread phenomenon. Additive manufacturing technology is defined as the fabrication of a 3D model or prototype by agglomerating the biomaterials layer by layer in a specific pattern dictated by the computer-aided design software. With the aid of this technology; structures with superior biocompatibility are rapidly, precisely, and inexpensively fabricated for direct medical utilization. In contemporary dentistry, manifold additive manufacturing techniques have been developed for the fabrication of fixed prosthetic restorations, removable dentures, surgical guides, individualized implants, custom impression trays, and anatomical models. Of these; stereolithography, selective laser sintering, selective laser melting, fused deposition modeling, and electron beam melting are commonly used. However, scientific data regarding their material options and working principles are still insufficient. Therefore, the aim of this review is to study the current status of common additive manufacturing techniques in prosthetic dentistry.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNÖRAL, Ö., ABUGOFA, A. (2020). Advancements in 3D Printing Technology: Applications and Options for Prosthetic Dentistry. Cyprus Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 176–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/149508

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, Gou J, Hui D. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Compos Part B-Eng 2017
  2. [Crossref] 2. Javaid M, Haleem A. Current status and applications of additive manufacturing in dentistry: A literature-based review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2019
  3. 9(3): 179-85. [Crossref] 3. Dawood A, Marti BM, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J 2015
  4. 219(11): 521. [Crossref] 4. Dizon JR, Espera Jr AH, Chen Q, Advincula RC. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers. Addit Manuf 2018
  5. [Crossref] 5. Galante R, Figueiredo-Pina CG, Serro AP. Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: A review. Dent Mater 2019
  6. 35(6): 825-46. [Crossref] 6. Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: Options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res 2016
  7. 60(2): 72-84. [Crossref] 7. Revilla-León M, Özcan M. Additive manufacturing technologies used for processing polymers: current status and potential application in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont 2019
  8. 28(2): 146-58. [Crossref] 8. Revilla-León M, Sadeghpour M, Özcan M. An update on applications of 3D printing technologies used for processing polymers used in implant dentistry. Odontology 2019. Doi: 10.1007/s10266-019-00441-7. [Epub ahead of print]. [Crossref] 9. Revilla-León M, Meyer MJ, Özcan M. Metal additive manufacturing technologies: literature review of current status and prosthodontic applications. Int J Comput Dent 2019
  9. 22(1): 55-67. 10. Revilla-León M, Gonzalez-Martín Ó, Pérez López J, Sánchez-Rubio JL, Özcan M. Position accuracy of implant analogs on 3D printed polymer versus conventional dental stone casts measured using a coordinate measuring machine. J Prosthodont 2018
  10. 27(6): 560-67. [Crossref] 11. Javaid M, Haleem A. Additive manufacturing applications in medical cases: A literature based review. Alexandria Med J 2018
  11. 54(4): 411-22. [Crossref] 12. Patzelt SB, Bishti S, Stampf S, Att W. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing–generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. J Am Dent Assoc 2014
  12. 145(11): 1133-40. [Crossref] 13. Alshawaf B, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Accuracy of printed casts generated from digital implant impressions versus stone casts from conventional implant impressions: A comparative in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018
  13. 29(8): 835-42. [Crossref] 14. Tatakis DN, Chien HH, Parashis AO. Guided