Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

The methods of dental implant stability measurement

Dental implantlarda stabilite ölçüm yöntemleri

Pages
81–86
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review focused on the various methods for evaluating of the dental implant stability and the clinical practice of these methods which is important for the long-term success and survival rates of the dental implants

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Implant stability is a key factor for successful osseointegration, which has been sighted as a direct structural and functional connection existing between bone and the surface of a load-carrying implant.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Achievement of implant stability is preliminary for successful clinical outcome.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review focused on the various methods for evaluating of the dental implant stability and the clinical practice of these methods which is important for the long-term success and survival rates of the dental implants
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Implant stability is a key factor for successful osseointegration, which has been sighted as a direct structural and functional connection existing between bone and the surface of a load-carrying implant. Achievement of implant stability is preliminary for successful clinical outcome. Therefore, measuring the implant stability is an important method for evaluating the success of an implant. Implant stability is achieved at two different stages: primary and secondary. Primary stability of an implant comes from mechanical connection with cortical bone. It is affected by the quantity and quality of bone that the implant is inserted into, surgical procedure, length, diameter, and form of the implant. Secondary stability is developed from regeneration and remodeling of the bone and tissue around the implant after insertion. The time of functional loading is dependent upon the secondary stability. It is, therefore, of an utmost importance to be able to quantify implant stability at various time points and to provide a long term prognosis based on the measured implant stability. Presently, various diagnostic methods have been suggested to identify implant stability. Some of these methods are not in use because of their both clinical application difficulty and conflict of ethical values and poor diagnostic data. This review focused on the various methods for evaluating of the dental implant stability and the clinical practice of these methods which is important for the long-term success and survival rates of the dental implants

Özet

Dental implant stabilitesi, kemik ve yüklenmiş implant yüzeyi arasındaki yapısal ve fonksiyonel bağlantının sağlandığı başarılı bir osseointegrasyon ile gerçekleştirilir ve başarılı klinik sonuçların elde edilmesi için gereklidir. Bu nedenle implant stabilitesinin ölçümü, osseointegrasyonun başarısını değerlendirmede önemli bir yöntemdir. İmplant stabilitesi; primer ve sekonder olmak üzere iki aşamada gerçekleşmektedir. Primer stabilite, implant ve kortikal kemik arasındaki mekanik bağlantı sonucunda oluşmaktadır ve implantın yerleştirildiği kemiğin miktarı ve kalitesi, uygulanan cerrahi teknik, implantın boy, çap ve şekli gibi faktörlerden etkilenmektedir. Sekonder stabilite, implant yerleşimi sonrasında, implant çevresinde kemik ve yumuşak dokunun rejenerasyonu ve remodelingi ile gelişmektedir. Fonksiyonel yüklemenin zamanı sekonder stabilite ile ilgilidir. Bu nedenle çeşitli zamanlarda implant stabilitesinin miktarını belirlemek ve uzun dönem prognozunu tahmin edebilmek için implant stabilitesinin ölçümü temel alınmalıdır. Son zamanlarda implant stabilitesini belirlemek için çeşitli diagnostik analiz yöntemleri önerilmiştir. Bu yöntemlerden bazıları, gerek klinik uygulama zorluğu ve etik nedenler gerekse güvenilir diagnostik veri sağlamadaki yetersizlikleri sebebi ile terkedilmiştir. Bu derlemede dental implantların uzun dönem sağkalım ve başarı değerlendirmesi için gerekli olan implant stabilitesinin belirlenmesinde kullanılan çeşitli yöntemlerden ve bu yöntemlerin klinik kullanımlarından bahsedilecektir

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇAKBÜYÜKDERE, A., DOĞAR, D. G. (2018). The methods of dental implant stability measurement. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 81–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/149343

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Immediate and early implant loading protocols: a literature review of clinical studies. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 242-258
  2. Tarnow DP, Emtiaz S, Classi A. Immediate loading of threaded implants at stage 1 surgery in edentulous arches: ten consecutive case reports with 1-to 5-year data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 319-324
  3. Al-Sawai A-A, Labib H. Success of immediate loading implants compared to conventionally-loaded implants: a literature review. J Investig Clin Dent 2016; 7: 217-224
  4. Bischof M, Nedir R, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard J-P, Samson J. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 529-539
  5. Östman P-O, Hellman M, Sennerby L. Direct implant loading in the edentulous maxilla using a bone density-adapted surgical protocol and primary implant stability criteria for inclusion. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7: 60-69
  6. Maló P, Rangert B, Nobre M. All-on-4 Immediate-Function Concept with Brånemark System® Implants for Completely Edentulous Maxillae: a 1-Year Retrospective Clinical Study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7: 88-94
  7. Brånemark P-I et al. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses: I Experimental studies. J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 3: 81-100
  8. Albrektsson T, Brånemark P-I, Hansson H-A, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981; 52: 155-170
  9. Atsumi M, Park S, Wang H. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 743-754
  10. Sunden S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H-G. Accuracy and precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical instability in Brånemark dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6: 220-226
  11. Olivé J, Aparicio C. The Periotest Method as a Mea sure of Osseointegrated Oral Implant Stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 88-105
  12. Zix J, Hug S, Kessler-Liechti G, Mericske-Stern R. Measurement of dental implant stability by resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment: comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 525-530
  13. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 261-267
  14. Meredith N. A review of nondestructive test m