Journals / Anestezi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

PED‹YATR‹K YANIK HASTALARINDA SANTRAL VENÖZ KATETER‹ZASYON: TEK B‹R MERKEZ DENEY‹M‹N‹N ALTI YILLIK KL‹N‹K SONUÇLARI

CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION IN PEDIATRIC BURN PATIENTS: SIX-YEAR CLINICAL OUTCOMES IN A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

Pages
175–179
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Femoral ven kateterizasyonlar›nda enfeksiyon oranlar› istatiksel olarak anlaml› olmasa da yüksektir.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Amaç: Çocuk yan›k hastalar›ndaki santral venöz kateter uygulamalar› az say›da çal›flma vard›r.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bu çal›flmada ciddi yan›k yüzdesi ve derecesine sahip hastalar›n takip edildi¤i 10 yatakl› çocuk yan›k ünitesinde anestezi bölümü taraf›ndan tak›lan santral venöz kateter uygulamalar› ile ilgili 6 y›ll›k deneyimin paylafl›lmas› amaçland›.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Femoral ven kateterizasyonlar›nda enfeksiyon oranlar› istatiksel olarak anlaml› olmasa da yüksektir.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Amaç: Çocuk yan›k hastalar›ndaki santral venöz kateter uygulamalar› az say›da çal›flma vard›r. Bu çal›flmada ciddi yan›k yüzdesi ve derecesine sahip hastalar›n takip edildi¤i 10 yatakl› çocuk yan›k ünitesinde anestezi bölümü taraf›ndan tak›lan santral venöz kateter uygulamalar› ile ilgili 6 y›ll›k deneyimin paylafl›lmas› amaçland›. Yöntem: Ocak 2009- Aral›k 2015 tarihleri aras›nda Ankara Çocuk Sa¤l›¤› ve Hastal›klar› Hematoloji-Onkoloji E¤itim Araflt›rma Hastanesi, çocuk yan›k yo¤un bak›m ünitesinde anestezi bölümü taraf›ndan santral venöz kateter uygulanan 84 pediyatrik hastan›n anestezi formlar›, laboratuvar kay›tlar› retrospektif olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Ocak 2009- Aral›k 2015 tarihleri aras›nda 15 gün-17 yafl aral›¤›nda 84 çocuk yan›k hastas›na 122 santral venöz kateter tak›ld›. 73 (59.8 %) internal juguler ven, 49 (40.2 %) femoral ven kullan›ld›. Hastalar›n %63.9’u 4 yafl ve alt›nda idi. Kateterizasyon s›ras›nda ve sonras›nda major komplikasyon ile karfl›lafl›lmad›. Kateter kültürlerinde en çok Acinetobacter izole edildi. Sonuç: Çocuk yan›k hastalar›nda, %40 ve üzeri yan›k alan›na sahip olmak kateter yeri ve yan›k nedeninden ba¤›ms›z olarak mortaliteden sorumludur. Femoral ven kateterizasyonlar›nda enfeksiyon oranlar› istatiksel olarak anlaml› olmasa da yüksektir.

Özet

Objective: There is a limited number of studies in which the central venous catheterization practices in pediatric burn patients is discussed. The aim of this study is to share 6 years of experience of central venous catheterization practices performed by the department of anesthesia in a pediatric burn intensive care unit. Method: Anesthesia forms and laboratory records of 84 pediatric patients, who underwent central venous catheterization by the anesthesiologists in the pediatric burn intensive care unit of Ankara Child Health and Diseases Hematology-Oncology Training and Research Hospital between January 2009-December 2015, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Between January 2009-December 2015, 122 central venous catheters were inserted in 84 pediatric burn patients aged between 15 days and 17 years. In 73 patients (59.8%) the internal jugular vein and in 49 patients (40.2%) femoral vein were preferred for catheterization. 63.9% of the patients were aged 4 years or under. No major complications were encountered during and after the catheterization. Acinetobacter species was the most isolated organism from the catheter cultures. Conclusion: Burn injury more than 40% of total burn surface area is responsible for the mortality regardless of the localization of the catheter and the cause of burn. Although not statistically significant, infection rates were high in the catheterization of the femoral vein.

🔖

Cite This Article

KESKİN, G., AKIN, M., SAYDAM, S., ŞENAYLI, Y., KURT, D. T., ÖZMERT, S., SEVER, F., ŞENAYLI, A. (2018). PED‹YATR‹K YANIK HASTALARINDA SANTRAL VENÖZ KATETER‹ZASYON: TEK B‹R MERKEZ DENEY‹M‹N‹N ALTI YILLIK KL‹N‹K SONUÇLARI. Anestezi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 175–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/149322

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Schexnayder SM, Storm EA, Stroud MH, et al. Pediatric Vascular Access and Centeses. In: Fuhrman BP, ZimmermanJJ (eds). Pediatric Critical Care. Philadelphia, Elsevier, 2011: 139-163.
  2. Fernandez EG, Sweeney MF, Green TP. Central venous catheters. In: Deckman RA, Fiser DH, Selbst SM (eds). Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care Procedures. StLouis: Mosby-Year Book, 1997: 196-202.
  3. Austin RE, Shahrokhi S, Bolourani S, Jeschke MG. Peripherally inserted central venous catheter safety in burn care: A s›ngle centre retrospect›ve cohort review. J Burn Care Res 2015; 36: 111-117. Teichgräber UK, Benter T, Gebel M, Manns MP. A sonographically guided technique for central venous access. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 731-733.
  4. Bruzoni M, Slater BJ, Wall J, St Peder SD, Dutta S. A prospective randomized trial of ultrasound vs landmark guided central venous access in the pediatric population. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 5: 939-943.
  5. Rey C, Alvarez F, Rua DL, et al. Mechanical complications during central venous cannulations in pediatric patients. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1438-1443. Karapinar B. Cura A. A complications of central venous catheterization in critically ill children. Pediatr Int 2007; 49; 593-599.
  6. Fearonce G, Faraklas I, Saffle JR, Cochran A. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters and central venous catheters in burn patients: A comparative review. J Burn Care Res 2010; 31: 31-35.
  7. Belba M, Belba G. Review of statistical data about severe burn patients treated during 2001 and evidence of septic cases in Albania. Burns 2004: 30; 813-819.
  8. Ganesamoni S, Kate V, Sadasivan J. Epidemiology of hospitalized burn patients in a tertiary care in South India. Burns 2010; 36: 422-429.
  9. Alp E, Coruh A, Gunay GK, Yontar Y, Doganay M. Risk factors for nosocomial infection and mortality in burn patients: 10 years of experience at a university hospital. J Burn Care Res 2012; 33: 379-385.
  10. Ramos GE, Bolgiani AN, Patin˜ o O, et al. Catheter infection risk related to the distance between insertion site and burned area. J Burn Care Rehabil 2002; 23: 266-271.
  11. O'Mara MS, Reed NL, Palmieri TL, Greenhalgh DG. Central venous catheter infections in burn patients with scheduled catheter exchange and replacement. J Surg Res 2007; 142: 341-350.
  12. Ciofi Silva CL, Rossi LA, Canini SR, Gonçalves N, Furuya RK. Site of catheter insertion in burn patients and infection: A systematic review. Burns 2014; 40: 365-373.
  13. Sheridan RL, Weber JM. Mechanical and infectious complications of central venous cannul