SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Higher Education Governance and Policy / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 1

How Can Marxist Higher Education Research Help Us Regain the Future in the Age of Uncertainty?

Krystian Szadkowski(Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan)0000-0002-7260-0457
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-11
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article concludes that Marxist higher education research should not merely interpret the university in crisis, but participate in movements that carry this crisis beyond its capitalist limits.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article asks how Marxist higher education research can help reclaim the future in an age of uncertainty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It begins from the claim that the contemporary university increasingly operates within the closed temporality of capitalism’s eternal present: a future imagined only as intensified competition, expanded measurement, higher productivity, and deeper integration into circuits of capital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article concludes that Marxist higher education research should not merely interpret the university in crisis, but participate in movements that carry this crisis beyond its capitalist limits.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:critique · methods · Marxism

Abstract

This article asks how Marxist higher education research can help reclaim the future in an age of uncertainty. It begins from the claim that the contemporary university increasingly operates within the closed temporality of capitalism’s eternal present: a future imagined only as intensified competition, expanded measurement, higher productivity, and deeper integration into circuits of capital. Against this horizon, the article revisits the Communist University of the Toilers of the East and the poetry of Nazım Hikmet as historical figures of an institution capable of materially organising a relation to a future beyond capitalism. It then argues that mainstream higher education research cannot adequately confront the capitalist transformation of the sector, because it remains constrained by borrowed conceptual frameworks, liberal public/private dichotomies, and an insufficient account of capital, struggle, and alternative institutionality. In response, the article develops the methodological proposal of integral Marxist critique, organised around three moments: “in,” “against,” and “beyond.” The moment “in” offers a critique of the political economy of higher education, examining how capital subsumes academic labour, study time, prestige, knowledge, measurement, publishing infrastructures, and relations of dependency. The moment “against” turns to student and academics struggles, especially through co-research, as sites where capitalist contradictions become visible and counter-subjectivities are produced. The moment “beyond” identifies the common as the material basis of non-capitalist academic relations already present within universities. The article concludes that Marxist higher education research should not merely interpret the university in crisis, but participate in movements that carry this crisis beyond its capitalist limits.

🔖

Cite This Article

Szadkowski, K. (2026). How Can Marxist Higher Education Research Help Us Regain the Future in the Age of Uncertainty?. Higher Education Governance and Policy, Volume: 7 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1941544

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (66)

  1. Alberici, E. (2021). The workerist style: For Romano Alquati (1960–1980) [Thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna].
  2. Alberici, E. (2026). Universality, race liberation, and education: A discussion between USSR and US [Doctoral dissertation, Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo].
  3. Alliez, É., & Lazzarato, M. (2018). Wars and capital. MIT Press.
  4. Althusser, L. (2014). On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. Verso.
  5. Alquati, R. (2019). Co-research and worker’s inquiry. South Atlantic Quarterly, 118(2), 470–478. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7381382.
  6. Arboledas-Lérida, L. (2024). The role of competitive project-based funding in the commodification of academic research: A Marxist analysis. Critical Sociology, 50(4-5), 845–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205231209679
  7. Ashwin, P. (2012). How often are theories developed through empirical research into higher education? Studies in Higher Education, 37(8), 941–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.557426
  8. Aydın, F., & Taşkın, Z. (2025). Research funding in Turkiye: Linking TUBITAK policy change to scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 130(11), 6455–6475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05461-5
  9. Azeri, S. (2025). Surplus-knowledge. Essays on epistemology and the constitution of the self. Editura Universității „Lucian Blaga” din Sibiu.
  10. Barnett, R. (2018). The ecological university: A feasible utopia. Routledge.
  11. Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times: Living in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press.
  12. Beer, D. (2016). Metric Power. Palgrave Macmillan.
  13. Bligh, B., & Flood, M. (2017). Activity theory in empirical higher education research: Choices, uses and values. Tertiary Education and Management, 23(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2017.1284258
  14. Butler, L.-A., Matthias, L., Simard, M.-A., Mongeon, P., & Haustein, S. (2023). The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(4), 778–799. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00272
  15. Caffentzis, G., & Federici, S. (2014). Commons against and beyond capitalism. Community Development Journal, 49(1), i92–i105.
  16. Cantwell, B. (2020). Explanatory accounts in international and comparative higher education research, Higher Education Quarterly, 74(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12246
  17. De Angelis, M. (2017). Omnia sunt communia. On the commons and the transformation to post-capitalism. Bloomsbury Academic.
  18. Djagalov, R. (2020). From internationalism to postcolonialism: Literature and cinema between the Second and the Third Worlds. McGill-Queen's University Press.
  19. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. Free Press.
  20. Galbraith, J. K. (1977). The age of uncertainty. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  21. Hall, R. (2018). The alienated academic. Palgrave Macmillan.
  22. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Harvard University Press.
  23. Hay, C. (2006). Political ontology. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 78–96). Oxford University Press.
  24. Ivancheva, M., & Garvey, B. (2022). Putting the university to work: The subsumption of academic labour in UK's shift to digital higher education. New Technology, Work and Employment, 37(3), 381-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12237
  25. Jameson, F. (1994). The seeds of time. Columbia University Press.
  26. Kalbarczyk, M., Ochwat, A., Radomski, S., Szadkowski, K., Straszewski, J., Taran, A., & Wilczyńska, G. (2024). Jowita zostaje: historia 10 dni ruchu studenckiego. Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne Heterodox.
  27. Kislenko, I. (2026). Goodbye, Global East? Failed strategic essentialism and wrong epistemological equation through the lens of Russia’s war against Ukraine. Problems of Post-Communism, 73(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2025.2503883
  28. Knoche, M. (2020). Science communication and open access: The critique of the political economy of capitalist academic publishers as ideology critique. tripleC, 18(2), 508–534. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i2.1183
  29. Krawczyk, F., & Gibson, A. G. (2025). The debate on centres and peripheries in higher education: Returning concepts to the critical cycle. Learning and Teaching, 18(2), 34-57. https://doi.org/10.3167/latiss.2025.180203
  30. Kreimer, P. (2025). The subordinate integration in the production and circulation of knowledge: Origin, development and rewritings. In N. Invernizzi & L. Rodriguez Medina (Eds.), Latin American breakthroughs in STS theory (pp. 63–87). Springer.
  31. Kula, W. (1986). Measures and men. Princeton University Press.
  32. Lazzarato, M. (2012). The making of indebted man. An essay on the neoliberal condition. Semiotext(e).
  33. Lazzarato, M. (2015). Governing by debt. Semiotext(e).
  34. Lund, A., & Zukerfeld, M. (2020). Corporate capitalism’s use of openness: Profit for free? Palgrave Macmillan.
  35. Macfarlane, B. (2012). The higher education research archipelago. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(1), 129-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642846
  36. Macfarlane, B. (2022). A voyage around the ideological islands of higher education research. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.2002275
  37. Marginson, S. (2016). Higher education and the common good. MUP Academic.
  38. Marginson, S. (2026). Global higher education in times of upheaval: On common good, geopolitics and decolonization. Bloomsbury Academic.
  39. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1968). The German ideology. Progress Publishers.
  40. Marini, R. M. (2022). The dialectics of dependency. Monthly Review Press.
  41. Müller, M. (2020). In search of the Global East: Thinking between North and South. Geopolitics, 25(3), 734–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1477757
  42. Münch, R. (2014). Academic capitalism: Universities in the global struggle for excellence. Routledge.
  43. Neary, M., & Winn, J. (2017). Beyond public and private: A framework for co-operative higher education. Open Library of Humanities, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.195
  44. Poutanen, M. (2026). Accelerated academia: Time regimes of a university merger. Minerva, 64, 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-025-09571-5
  45. Preston, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the capitalist university: Academic labour, commodification, and value. Routledge.
  46. Read, J. (2003). The Micro-politics of Capital: Marx and the prehistory of the present. SUNY Press.
  47. Robinson, K. S. (2026). An examination of capitalism’s influence on student affairs labor in higher education. Capital & Class, 50(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168241268248
  48. Roggero, G. (2010). Five theses on the common. Rethinking Marxism, 22(3), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2010.490369
  49. Roggero, G. (2011). The production of living knowledge: The crisis of the university and the transformation of labor in Europe and North America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  50. Roggero, G. (2014). Notes on framing and re-inventing co-research. Ephemera, 14(3), 511–519.
  51. Saunders, G. (2023). Prefiguring the idea of the university for a post-capitalist society. Palgrave MacMillan.
  52. Slaughter, S. (2001). Problems in Comparative Higher Education: Political economy, political sociology and postmodernism. Higher Education, 41(4), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017505525288
  53. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  54. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  55. Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic.
  56. Szadkowski, K. (2019). The common in higher education. Higher Education, 78(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0340-4
  57. Szadkowski, K. (2023). Capital in higher education: A critique of the political economy of the sector. Palgrave Macmillan.
  58. Szadkowski, K., & Krzeski, J. (2022). Conceptualizing capitalist transformations of universities: Marx’s relevance for higher education research. Critique, 50(1), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2022.2050536
  59. Szadkowski, K., & Krzeski, J. (2025). A Marxist critique of the ruined university. Springer.
  60. Tight, M. (2003). Researching higher education. Open University Press.
  61. Tight, M. (2004). Research into higher education: An a-theoretical community of practice? Higher Education Research & Development, 23(4), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000276431
  62. Tight, M. (2015). Theory development and application in higher education research: Tribes and territories. Higher Education Policy, 28(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.11
  63. Vercellone, C. (2007). From formal subsumption to general intellect: Elements for a Marxist reading of the thesis of cognitive capitalism. Historical Materialism, 15(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920607X171681
  64. Vercellone, C. (2024). Prefazione. In F. M. Pezzulli, L'università indigesta: Professori e studenti nell'accademia neoliberale (pp. 9–25). DeriveApprodi.
  65. Wallerstein, I. (2004). Utopistics. Historical choices of the 21st century. The New Press.
  66. Welsh, J. (2019). Ranking academics: Toward a critical politics of academic rankings. Critical Policy Studies, 13(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1398673 Winn, J. (2015). Writing about academic labour. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, (25), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.14288/workplace.v0i25.185095