Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1

Percutaneous Cryoablation of Subcapsular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Retrospective Study of 57 Cases

Pages
34–39
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION Percutaneous cryoablation for subcapsular HCC is safe and effective; the procedure is simple and the patients suffer less pain.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the percutaneous cryoablation for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS A total of 57 patients with subcapsular (<1 cm form the liver edge) HCCs (68 lesions), who were treated with CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation in the Department of Interventional Radiology of our hospital between July 1, 2016 and September 1, 2018, were retrospectively included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION Percutaneous cryoablation for subcapsular HCC is safe and effective; the procedure is simple and the patients suffer less pain.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the percutaneous cryoablation for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS A total of 57 patients with subcapsular (<1 cm form the liver edge) HCCs (68 lesions), who were treated with CT-guided percutaneous cryoablation in the Department of Interventional Radiology of our hospital between July 1, 2016 and September 1, 2018, were retrospectively included. Complete ablation rate, local tumor progression (LTP) and treatment-related complications were evaluated. Furthermore, the degree of intraoperative and postoperative pain was measured with the visual analog scale (VAS), and laboratory findings were compared before and after the procedure. RESULTS All patients successfully completed the treatment. The mean follow-up period was 12.8 months (range, 3–27 months), and the complete ablation rate was 97% (66/68). Local tumor progression occurred in 11 lesions (16.2%), and the 6-, 12- and 18-month cumulative LTP rates were 4.0%, 8.2% and 20.5%, respectively. Two patients (3.5%, 2/57) developed major complications, and 12 patients had minor complications (22.8%, 12/57). The mean VAS score during the operation was 1.65 points (range, 1–3 points). Postoperative pain worsened in 3 patients, and the VAS scores reached 4–5. Transient changes in biochemical and hematologic markers were observed. CONCLUSION Percutaneous cryoablation for subcapsular HCC is safe and effective; the procedure is simple and the patients suffer less pain.

🔖

Cite This Article

WANG, F., MA, J., WU, L., LI, N., LUO, R., YANG, J. (2020). Percutaneous Cryoablation of Subcapsular Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Retrospective Study of 57 Cases. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 1, 34–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/148836

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Rawla P, Sunkara T, Muralidharan P, Raj JP. Update in global trends and aetiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2018; 22:141–150. [CrossRef] de Baere T, Elias D, Dromain C, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of 100 hepatic metastases with a mean follow-up of more than 1 year. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:1619–25. [CrossRef] Choi H, Loyer EM, DuBrow RA, et al. Radio-frequency ablation of liver tumors: assessment of therapeutic response and complications. Radiographics 2001; 21:S41–54. [CrossRef] Seror O, N'Kontchou G, Ganne N, Beaugrand M. A randomized trial comparing radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection for HCC conforming to the Milan criteria. Ann Surg 2011; 254:837. [CrossRef] Ahmed M, Brace CL, Lee FT, Jr., Goldberg SN. Principles of and advances in percutaneous ablation. Radiology 2011; 258:351–369. [CrossRef] Feng K, Yan J, Li X, et al. A randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency ablation and surgical resection in the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012; 57:794–802. [CrossRef] Mulier S, Ruers T, Jamart J, Michel L, Marchal G, Ni Y. Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for resectable colorectal liver metastases: time for a randomized trial? An update. Dig Surg 2008; 25:445–460. [CrossRef] van Amerongen MJ, Jenniskens SFM, van den Boezem PB, Futterer JJ, de Wilt JHW. Radiofrequency ablation compared to surgical resection for curative treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases - a meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2017; 19:749–756. [CrossRef] Llovet JM, Vilana R, Bru C, et al. Increased risk of tumor seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2001; 33:1124–1129. [CrossRef] Bonny C, Abergel A, Gayard P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2002; 26:735–741.
  2. Livraghi T, Solbiati L, Meloni MF, Gazelle GS, Halpern EF, Goldberg SN. Treatment of focal liver tumors with percutaneous radio-frequency ablation: complications encountered in a multicenter study. Radiology 2003; 226:441–451. [CrossRef] Rhim H. Complications of radiofrequency ablation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 2005; 30:409–418. [CrossRef] Jaskolka JD, Asch MR, Kachura JR, et al. Needle tract seeding after radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005; 16:485–491. [CrossRef] Sartori S, Tombesi P, Macario F, et al. Subcapsular liver tumors treated with percutaneous radiofr