Journals / Central Bank Review / 2012 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Öğrenme, Para Politikası ve Konut Fiyatları

Learning, Monetary Policy, and Housing Prices

Pages
13–36
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that for current data rule, responding to asset prices does not improve learnable outcomes but for a monetary policy with lagged data and forward-looking rules we see improved learnable outcome if current housing prices are available to monetary authority.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper evaluates different types of simple monetary policy rules according to the determinacy and the learnability of rational expectations equilibrium criteria within a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium framework.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Incorporating housing prices and collateralized borrowing into the standard model allows us to answer important policy questions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that for current data rule, responding to asset prices does not improve learnable outcomes but for a monetary policy with lagged data and forward-looking rules we see improved learnable outcome if current housing prices are available to monetary authority.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper evaluates different types of simple monetary policy rules according to the determinacy and the learnability of rational expectations equilibrium criteria within a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium framework. Incorporating housing prices and collateralized borrowing into the standard model allows us to answer important policy questions. One objective is to investigate whether responding to housing prices affects determinacy and learnability of rational expectations equilibrium (REE). For this purpose, we work with a New Keynesian model in which housing plays an accelerator role in business cycles as a collateralized asset. The results show that for current data rule, responding to asset prices does not improve learnable outcomes but for a monetary policy with lagged data and forward-looking rules we see improved learnable outcome if current housing prices are available to monetary authority. Moreover, we examine the effects of interest rate inertia and price stickiness on E-stability of REE.

Özet

Bu çalışma, farklı para politikası kurallarını rasyonel beklentiler dengesinin belirlilik (determinacy) ve öğrenilebilirlik (learnability) kiriterlerine göre değerlendirmektedir. Standart bir modele konut ve kredi piyasalarını da dahil etmek önemli para politikası sorularına cevap verme imkanı tanımaktadır. Çalışmanın bir amacı da, konut fiyatlarındaki hareketlere tepki veren para politikası kurallarının rasyonel bekleyişler dengesinin belirliliğine ve öğrenilebilirliğine etki edip etmediğini incelemektir. Bunun için, konut sektörünün iş çevrimleri üzerinde ivmelendirme etkisi oluşturduğu bir yeni keynesyen model kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, cari dönem verilerini dikkate alan para politikası kuralları için konut fiyatlarına verilen tepkiyle birlikte, öğrenilebilirliğin artmadığını ancak geçmiş dönem ve ileriye dönük verilere tepki veren para politikası kuralları için öğrenilebilirliğin daha geniş politika parametrelerinde mümkün olduğunu göstermektedir. Son olarak faiz oranı ataleti ve fiyat katılıklarının rasyonel bekleyişler dengesinin öğrenilebilirliğini nasıl etkilediği incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KANIK, B. (2012). Öğrenme, Para Politikası ve Konut Fiyatları. Central Bank Review, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 13–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/148724

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Benhabib, J., and Roger E. A. Farmer, 1998, “Indeterminacy and Sunspots in Macroeconomics” in J.B. Taylor and M. Woodford (eds), Handbook of Macroeconomics, Edition 1, Vol.1, Chapter 6, pp.387-448.
  2. Bernanke, B. and M.Woodford, 1997, “Inflation Forecasts and Monetary Policy” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 29, 653-684.
  3. Bullard, J. and K. Mitra, 2002, “Learning About Monetary Policy Rules” Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 1105-1129.
  4. Bullard, J. and K. Mitra, 2007, “Determinacy, Learnability and Monetary Policy Inertia” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39 (5), 1177-1212.
  5. Carlstrom, C. and T. Fuerst, 2000, “Forward-Looking versus Backward-Looking Taylor Rules” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper 0009. Carlstrom, C. and T. Fuerst, 2001, “Timing and Real Indeterminacy in Monetary Models”, Journal of Monetary Economics 47:285-298.
  6. Carlstrom, C. and T. Fuerst, 2007, “Asset Prices, Nominal Rigidities, and Monetary Policy” Review of Economic Dynamics 10, 256-275.
  7. Christiano, L. and C. Gust, 1999, “Taylor Rules in a Limited Participation Model”NBER Working Paper No. 7017, March. Clarida, R., J. Gali and M. Gertler, 2000, “Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115:147-180.
  8. Evans, G. and S. Honkapohja, 1999, “Learning Dynamics”in: Taylor, J. and M.Woodford (Eds). Handbook of Macroeconomics. North-Holland, Amsterdam. Evans, G. and S. Honkapohja, 2001, “Learning and Expectations in Macroeconomics” Princeton University Press,
  9. Princeton, New Jersey. Howitt, P., 1992, “Interest Rate Control and Nonconvergence to Rational Expectations” Journal of Political Economy 100:776-800.
  10. Iacoviello, M., 2005, “House Prices, Borrowing Constraints, and Monetary Policy in the Business Cycle” American Economic Review. 95(3):739-64.
  11. Kanik, B. and W. Xiao, 2010, “News, Housing Boom-Bust Cycles and Monetary Policy” unpublished manuscript. Leamer, E., 2007, “Housing is the Business Cycle” NBER Working Paper 13428. Muellbauer, J., 2008, “Housing, Credit and Consumer Expenditure” CEPR Discussion Papers 6782. Rudebusch, G.D., 1995, “Federal Reserve Interest Rate Targeting, Rational Expectations, and The Term Structure” Journal of Monetary Economics. 35, 245-274.
  12. Sack, B., 1998, “Uncertainty, Learning and Gradual Monetary Policy” Federal Reserve Board Finance and Economics Discussion Series 34. Woodford, M., 1999, “Optimal Monetary Policy Inertia” NBER Working Paper 7261. Woodford, M., 2003, Interest and P