Journals / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Sürdürebilir Labaratuvar Güvenliği Kültürü

Pages
216–222
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This document is intended for laboratory workers who have the primary responsibility for maintaining laboratories as safe, healthy places to work and for ensuring that applicable health, safety and environmental regulations are followed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Many workers are employed in laboratories in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The laboratory environment can be a hazardous place to work.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This document is intended for laboratory workers who have the primary responsibility for maintaining laboratories as safe, healthy places to work and for ensuring that applicable health, safety and environmental regulations are followed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Many workers are employed in laboratories in Turkey. The laboratory environment can be a hazardous place to work. Laboratory workers are exposed to numerous potential hazards including chemical, biological, physical and radioactive hazards. Laboratory workers need to be educated to take safety seriously, acknowledge areas of improvement in their laboratories, and begin creating a safety culture of their own. It is difficult for them to know the requirements of laboratory safety without having the necessary experience. This document is intended for laboratory workers who have the primary responsibility for maintaining laboratories as safe, healthy places to work and for ensuring that applicable health, safety and environmental regulations are followed.

Özet

Ülkemizde laboratuvarlarda çok sayıda çalışan bulunmaktadır. Laboratuvar çevresi, çalışmak için tehlikeli bir yerdir. Laboratuvar çalışanları kimyasal, biyolojik, fiziksel ve radyoaktif tehlikeler dahil çok sayıda potansiyel tehlikelere maruz kalmaktadır. Laboratuvar çalışanları, laboratuvarlarında gelişme alanlarına uygun güvenlik kültürlerini oluşturmaya ve eğitilmeye ihtiyaç duymaktadırlar. Laboratuvar güvenliğinin sağlanması tecrübeli çalışan olmadan çok zordur. Bu çalışma, ilgili sağlık, güvenlik ve çevre düzenlemelerini takip ederek laboratuvarları çalışmak için güvenli, sağlıklı yerler olarak korumakla öncelikli sorumluluğu olan laboratuvar çalışanları için hazırlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRKAN, E. H. (2018). Sürdürebilir Labaratuvar Güvenliği Kültürü. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 216–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/148685

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, John, R, Cash B.D, Pasha, S.F, Early, D.S, Muthusamy, V.R et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2015,81(4),781-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.048.
  2. Sweetser, S, Baron, TH. Optimizing bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2015, 90 (4), 520-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.01.015.
  3. Wexner, SD, Beck, D.E, Baron, T.H, et al. A Consensus Document on Bowel Preparation before Colonoscopy: Prepared by a Task Force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2006, 63(7), 894-909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.03.918. Gimeno-García, A.Z, Baute, J.L, Hernandez, G, et al. Risk factors for ınadequate bowel preparation: a validated predictive score. Endoscopy, 2017, 49 (6), 536-43. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-101683.
  4. Johnson, D.A, Barkun, A.N, Cohen, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the us multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology, 2014, 147 (4), 903-24. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.002.
  5. Froehlich, F, Wietlisbach, V, Gonvers, J.J, Burnand, B, Vader, J.P. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: The European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European Multicenter Study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005,61 (3), 378-84.
  6. Görücü, K.Y, İhsan, U, Acartürk, G. Yatan Hastalarda Kolonoskopi Öncesi Barsak Hazırlığı Talimatlarına Hastaların Uyumu ve Tolerans Düzeyi. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi, 2011, 1 (4), 135-39.
  7. Rex, D.K, Imperiale, T.F, Latinovich, D, Bratcher, L.L. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2002, 97(7),1696-700.
  8. Sherer, E.A, Imler, T.D, Imperiale, T.F. The effect of colonoscopy preparation quality on adenoma detection rates. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2012, 75 (3), 545-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.022.
  9. Chokshi, R.V, Hovis, C.E, Hollander, T, Early, D.S, Wang, J.S. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with ınadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2012,75 (6), 1197-1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.005.
  10. Hong, S.N, Sung, I.K, Kim, J.H, et al. The effect of the bowel preparation status on the risk of