SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Economics Research Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Foreign Direct Investment, International Trade and Financial Development in BRICS-T Countries: A Bootstrap Panel Causality Analysis

SERKAN ŞAHİN
Pages
301–316
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, it is found in this study that not only international trade stimulates FDI, but also FDI induce international trade in India and Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this paper is to investigate, within a Bootstrap panel causality approach, the interactions among foreign direct investment (FDI), international trade and financial development in BRICS-T countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China South Africa and Turkey).
📊
Key Findings & Data:While the effect of foreign direct investment on economic growth is well documented, the consequences of FDI on financial development have not received as much attention.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, it is found in this study that not only international trade stimulates FDI, but also FDI induce international trade in India and Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this paper is to investigate, within a Bootstrap panel causality approach, the interactions among foreign direct investment (FDI), international trade and financial development in BRICS-T countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China South Africa and Turkey). While the effect of foreign direct investment on economic growth is well documented, the consequences of FDI on financial development have not received as much attention. Previous studies have recognized that FDI is a crucial source of financing especially for emerging economies, though the benefit of FDI to recipient country is ambiguous. Furthermore, the number of previous studies examining the causal linkage between international trade and financial development is also limited. Besides, examining the associations among these factors, this study also investigates the joint effect of FDI and international trade on financial development in these countries. Empirical findings from a bootstrap panel causality approach indicate that FDI induce financial development in Brazil, Russia, and China. In addition, international trade promotes financial market development in Brazil, Russia and South Africa. Empirical findings also indicate that financial development stimulates international trade in Brazil, India and Turkey. Finally, it is found in this study that not only international trade stimulates FDI, but also FDI induce international trade in India and Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, S. (2018). Foreign Direct Investment, International Trade and Financial Development in BRICS-T Countries: A Bootstrap Panel Causality Analysis. Business and Economics Research Journal, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 301–316. https://ajindex.com/articles/148645

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. (2003). FDI spillovers, financial markets and economic development. IMF Working Papers No: WP/03/186, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2003/wp03186.pdf.
  2. Alfaro, L., Kalemli Ozcan, S., & Volosovych, V. (2008). Why doesn't capital flow from rich to poor countries? An empirical investigation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2), 347-368.
  3. Alfaro, L., Kalemli Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. (2009). FDI, productivity, and financial development. The World Economy, 32(1), 111–135.
  4. Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. (2010). Does foreign direct ınvestment promote growth? Exploring the role of financial markets on linkages. Journal of Development Economics, 91, 242-256.
  5. Ang, J.B. (2008). Determinants of foreign direct investment in Malaysia. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(1), 185-189.
  6. Arun, K., & Yıldırım, D.Ç. (2017). Effects of foreign direct ınvestment on intellectual property, patents and R&D. MPRA Paper 80470, https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/80470.html.
  7. Asiedu, E. (2002). On the determinants of foreign direct investment to developing countries: Is Africa different?, World Development, 30(1), 107- 119. Asiedu, E. (2006). Foreign direct investment in Africa: The role of natural resources, market size, government policy. Institutions and Political Instability, The World Economy, 29(1), 63-77.
  8. Baltagi, B.H., & Song, S.H. (2006). Unbalanced Panel Data: A Survey. Statistical Papers, 47, 493-523.
  9. Baltagi, B.H., Demetriades, P., & Law, S.H. (2009). Financial development and openness: Evidence from Panel Data. Journal of Development Economics, 89, 285 –296. Beck, T. (2002). Financial development and ınternational trade ıs there a link? Journal of International Economics, 57, 107-131.
  10. Bekaert, G., Harvey, C.R., & Lundblad, C. (2005). Does financial liberalization spur growth? Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 3–56.
  11. Bettin, G., & Zazzaro, A. (2011). Remittances and financial development: Substitutes or complements in economic growth? Bulletin of Economic Research. 64(4), 509–536.
  12. Brainard, S.L. (1997). An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade. American Economic Review, 87(4), 520-544.
  13. Breusch, T., & Pagan, A. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its application to model specifications in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253.
  14. Desbordes, R., & Wei, S.J. (2014). The effects of financial development on