Journals / Fundamental Journal of Mathematics and Applications / 2026 / Volume: 9 Issue: 3

Parameter Estimation in Multidimensional Diffusion Models with Low Regularity Coefficients

Dmytro Ivanenko(Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv)0000-0002-6561-0091
Rostyslav Pogorielov(Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv)0000-0002-4213-6809
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the main practical differences between the competing procedures arise in the estimation of diffusion parameters.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper studies parameter estimation for discretely observed multidimensional diffusion models with low-regularity coefficients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The approach yields a continuously differentiable quasi-likelihood function and allows the construction of a quasi-maximum likelihood estimator for the unknown parameter vector.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the main practical differences between the competing procedures arise in the estimation of diffusion parameters.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation · Multidimensional diffusion process · Hermite expansion

Abstract

This paper studies parameter estimation for discretely observed multidimensional diffusion models with low-regularity coefficients. Since the transition density of such models is typically unavailable in closed form, likelihood-based inference becomes difficult, especially in multidimensional settings. To address this problem, we construct and computationally investigate a Hermite-based quasi-maximum likelihood estimator based on a parametrix-type decomposition of the transition density. The approach yields a continuously differentiable quasi-likelihood function and allows the construction of a quasi-maximum likelihood estimator for the unknown parameter vector. In addition, conditional least-squares estimators based on first- and second-order discretizations are considered, together with one-step and Rao-type corrections. The numerical study is carried out for two nonlinear multidimensional diffusion models. The results show that the main practical differences between the competing procedures arise in the estimation of diffusion parameters. In the presented examples, the Hermite-based quasi-maximum likelihood estimator provides the most accurate and best-centered recovery of the diffusion parameter, while the corrected conditional least-squares estimators improve the corresponding uncorrected procedures to varying degrees. The drift parameter is recovered with broadly comparable accuracy by several methods. The emphasis of the present study is on computational construction and finite-sample numerical performance rather than on establishing a new asymptotic theory for the resulting estimator. These results indicate that Hermite-based quasi-likelihood estimation is a viable and computationally implementable tool for inference in multidimensional diffusion models with reduced regularity. The proposed framework may be useful in broader problems of stochastic modelling and numerical identification for nonlinear systems.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ivanenko, D., Pogorielov, R. (2026). Parameter Estimation in Multidimensional Diffusion Models with Low Regularity Coefficients. Fundamental Journal of Mathematics and Applications, Volume: 9 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.33401/fujma.1953564

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. F. Black and M. Scholes, The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, J. Pol. Econ., 81(3) (1973), 637–654. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1086/260062}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85015692260?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} $
  2. R.J. Adler, P. Müller and B.L. Rozovskii, Stochastic Modelling in Physical Oceanography, Birkhauser Boston, MA, (1996). $\href{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2430-3}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} $
  3. W. Dieterich, P. Fulde and I. Peschel, Theoretical models for superionic conductors, Adv. Phys., 29(3) (1980), 527–605. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1080/00018738000101406}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0019018092?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:A1980KG94900002}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  4. H. Sørensen, Parametric inference for diffusion processes observed at discrete points in time: a survey, Int. Stat. Rev., 72(3) (2004), 337–354. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2004.tb00241.x}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/10244220000?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000225684100005}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  5. J.C. Jimenez, R.J. Biscay and T. Ozaki, Inference methods for discretely observed continuous-time stochastic volatility models: a commented overview, Asia-Pac Financ Markets, 12 (2005), 109–141. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-006-9015-8}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33748424861?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000211840200001}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  6. J.N. Nielsen, H. Madsen and P.C. Young, Parameter estimation in stochastic differential equations: an overview, Annu. Rev. Control, 24 (2000), 83–94. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5788(00)90017-8}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0033750896?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} $
  7. A.R. Pedersen, A new approach to maximum likelihood estimation for stochastic differential equations based on discrete observations, Scand. J. Stat., 22(1) (1995), 55–71. $ \href{https://www.jstor.org/stable/4616340}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:A1995QP31800003}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  8. G.B. Durham and A.R. Gallant, Numerical techniques for maximum likelihood estimation of continuous-time diffusion processes, J. Bus. Econom. Statist., 20(3) (2002), 297–316. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102288618397}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0036339461?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000182731600001}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  9. A. Hurn, J. Jeisman and K. Lindsay, ML estimation of the parameters of SDE’s by numerical solution of the Fokker–Planck equation, In: MODSIM 2005: International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: Advances and Applications for Management and Decision Making, (2005), 849–855. $ \href{https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kenneth-Lindsay-2/publication/27481784_ML_Estimation_Of_The_Parameters_Of_SDE's_By_Numerical_Solution_Of_The_Fokker-Planck_Equation/links/564f413108aeafc2aab3be49/ML-Estimation-Of-The-Parameters-Of-SDEs-By-Numerical-Solution-Of-The-Fokker-Planck-Equation.pdf}{\mbox{[Web]}} $
  10. L. Pichler, A. Masud and L.A. Bergman, Numerical solution of the Fokker–Planck equation by finite difference and finite element methods—a comparative study, in: S.T. Ariaratnam, S. Rajasekar and A.A. Kilbas (eds.), Computational Methods in Stochastic Dynamics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, (2013), 69–85. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5134-7_5}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84963570142?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} $
  11. P. Li and W. Gu, Estimation of 1-dimensional nonlinear stochastic differential equations based on higher-order partial differential equation numerical scheme and its application, Front. Math. China, 12(6) (2017), 1441–1455. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/s11464-017-0663-y}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85031123651?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000415252000012}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  12. A.S. Hurn, J.I. Jeisman and K.A. Lindsay, Transitional densities of diffusion processes: a new approach to solving the Fokker–Planck equation, J. Deriv., 14(4) (2007), 86–94. $\href{https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2007.686424}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/79958011130?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000252011100006}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  13. B. Jensen and R. Poulsen, Transition densities of diffusion processes: numerical comparison of approximation techniques, J. Deriv., 9(4) (2002), 18–32. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2002.319183}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85016660810?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} $
  14. B. Eraker, MCMC analysis of diffusion models with application to finance, J. Bus. Econom. Statist., 19(2) (2001), 177–191. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1198/073500101316970403}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0035586814?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000168232700005}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  15. A. Golightly and D.J. Wilkinson, Bayesian parameter inference for stochastic biochemical network models using particle Markov chain Monte Carlo, Interface Focus, 1(6) (2011), 807–820. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0047}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84860901236?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000297281000002}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  16. S. Donnet, J.L. Foulley and A. Samson, Bayesian analysis of growth curves using mixed models defined by stochastic differential equations, Biometrics, 66(3) (2010), 733–741. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01342.x}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77956862906?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000281950000008}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  17. A. Golightly and D.J. Wilkinson, Bayesian sequential inference for nonlinear multivariate diffusions, Stat. Comput., 16 (2006), 323–338. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-006-9392-x}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33750049940?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000241260600001}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  18. K.J. Singleton, Estimation of affine asset pricing models using the empirical characteristic function, J. Econometrics, 102(1) (2001), 111–141. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(00)00092-0}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0000807050?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000168681000004}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  19. C. Gourieroux, A. Monfort and E. Renault, Indirect inference, J. Appl. Econometrics, 8(S1) (1993), S85–S118. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.3950080507}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84904755473?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:A1993MP43500006}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  20. D. Duffie and K.J. Singleton, Simulated moments estimation of Markov models of asset prices, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass., USA, (1990). $ \href{https://doi.org/10.3386/t0087}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}}$
  21. C. Amorino and A. Gloter, Contrast function estimation for the drift parameter of ergodic jump diffusion process, Scand. J. Stat., 47(2) (2020), 279–346. $\href{https://doi.org/10.1111/sjos.12406}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85077850804?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000506432700001}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  22. B. Favetto, Parameter estimation by contrast minimization for noisy observations of a diffusion process, Statistics, 48(6) (2014), 1344–1370. $\href{https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2013.828058}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84908099580?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000343292800011}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  23. Y. Shimizu, Quadratic Type Contrast Functions for Discretely Observed Non-Ergodic Diffusion Processes, Osaka University, Mathematical Science Research Report, 09-04 (2009). $ \href{https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1344189}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} $
  24. Y. Suto, Y. Liu and M. Taniguchi, Asymptotic theory of parameter estimation by a contrast function based on interpolation error, Stat. Inference Stoch. Process., 19 (2016), 93–110. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/s11203-015-9116-y}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84960796498?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} $
  25. A. Neuenkirch and S. Tindel, A least square-type procedure for parameter estimation in stochastic differential equations with additive fractional noise, Stat. Inference Stoch. Process., 17(1) (2014), 99–120. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1007/s11203-013-9084-z}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84896394709?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} $
  26. K.W. Ahn and K.-S. Chan, Approximate conditional least squares estimation of a nonlinear state-space model via an unscented Kalman filter, Comput. Statist. Data Anal., 69 (2014), 243–254. $\href{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2013.07.038}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84884338796?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000326766600020}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  27. R.A. Kasonga, The consistency of a non-linear least squares estimator from diffusion processes, Stochastic Process. Appl., 30(2) (1988), 263–275. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4149(88)90088-9}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/38249029383?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:A1988R966400006}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  28. B.L.S. Prakasa Rao, Asymptotic theory for non-linear least squares estimator for diffusion processes, Series Statistics, 14(2) (1983), 195–209. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888308801695}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}}$
  29. S. Bodnarchuk, D. Ivanenko, A. Kohatsu-Higa and A. Kulik, Improved local approximation for multidimensional diffusions: the G-rates, Theory Probab. Math. Statist., 101 (2020), 13–38. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1090/tpms/1109}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85099417971?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000519544200002}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $
  30. D. Ivanenko and R. Pogorielov, Parameter estimation in diffusion models with low regularity coefficients, arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.06323 (2021). $ \href{https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.06323}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} $
  31. D.O. Ivanenko and R.V. Pogorielov, QML parameter estimation in diffusion models, AIP Conf. Proc., 2787(1) (2023). $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160877}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85176773313?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} $
  32. Y. Aıt-Sahalia, Maximum likelihood estimation of discretely sampled diffusions: a closed-form approximation approach, Econometrica, 70(1) (2002), 223–262. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00274}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0036216388?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000173526700007}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}}$
  33. R. Pogorielov and D. Ivanenko, Solution of stochastic boundary value problem in SDE using transition probability density function decomposition, Monte Carlo Methods Appl., 32(2) (2026), 105–141. $ \href{https://doi.org/10.1515/mcma-2026-3002}{\mbox{[CrossRef]}} \href{https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105037352831?origin=resultslist}{\mbox{[Scopus]}} \href{https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001748034200001}{\mbox{[Web of Science]}} $