Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

Anahtar Kelimeler: Doğa sermayesi, ekosistem piyasaları, doğa yatırımı, kapitalizm. The Analysis of Intervention to Ecological Field by Economic Instruments in Terms of the Relationship between Nature and Accumulation

İktisadi Araçlarla Ekolojik Alana Müdahalenin Doğa ve Birikim Süreci Açısından Analizi 1

Pages
159–196
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether or not the intervention to ecology by economic instruments produces a solution, and to analyze various social and natural consequences of this intervention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract: In the face of the increasing dimension of ecological problems after 1970, the intervention to ecological field by the means of economics has begunin the framework of the preservation of nature argument.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The roots of ecological problems have been explained through the concepts of economic field, such as externalities, the lack of market and private property rights and monetary value of the ecosystem services.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this study is to investigate whether or not the intervention to ecology by economic instruments produces a solution, and to analyze various social and natural consequences of this intervention.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Abstract: In the face of the increasing dimension of ecological problems after 1970, the intervention to ecological field by the means of economics has begunin the framework of the preservation of nature argument. The roots of ecological problems have been explained through the concepts of economic field, such as externalities, the lack of market and private property rights and monetary value of the ecosystem services. Thus, the solution has been constructed based on economic logic, and it has been argued that the excessive use of ecological entities can be prevented determining their prices and establishing markets. For this purpose, different pricing methods have been developed; ecosystem services have been classified and thus, have been rendered exchangeable, and nature has been defined as ‘natural capital’, a new form of capital. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether or not the intervention to ecology by economic instruments produces a solution, and to analyze various social and natural consequences of this intervention.

Özet

Öz: 1970 sonrası ekolojik sorunların büyüyen boyutu karşısında, doğanın korunması argümanı çerçevesinde iktisadın araçlarıyla ekolojik alana müdahale başlamıştır. Ekolojik sorunların kökeni, ekosistem hizmetlerinin fiyatının ve piyasasının olmaması, özel mülkiyet hakkının olmaması, dışsallıklar gibi iktisadi alanın kavramları üzerinden açıklanmıştır. Çözüm de iktisadi mantık çerçevesinde kurulmuş, ekolojik varlıkların fiyatı belirlenerek, piyasaları kurulduğu takdirde aşırı kullanımının önleneceği iddia edilmiştir. Bu amaçla çeşitli fiyatlama yöntemleri geliştirilmiş, ekosistem piyasalarının kurulabilmesi için ekosistem hizmetleri sınıflandırılarak, mübadele edilebilir hale getirilmiş, doğa yeni bir sermaye formu ‘doğa sermayesi’ olarak tanımlanmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı, iktisadi araçlarla ekolojik alana müdahalenin çözüm üretip üretmeyeceğini araştırmak ve bu müdahalenin yarattığı çeşitli toplumsal ve ekolojik sonuçları incelemektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUNYAYLA, F. (2015). Anahtar Kelimeler: Doğa sermayesi, ekosistem piyasaları, doğa yatırımı, kapitalizm. The Analysis of Intervention to Ecological Field by Economic Instruments in Terms of the Relationship between Nature and Accumulation. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 159–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/148436

References (20)

  1. Altvater, Elmar (2003), Is There an Ecological Marxism. Lecture at the Virtual University of CLACSO. Aronson James – Blignaut, James – Milton, Sue – Clewell, Andre (2006), “Natural Capital: The Limiting Factor”, Ecological Engineering, Vol. 28, No: 1. Baudrillard, Jean (2008),
  2. Tüketim Toplumu, Ayrıntı Yayınları,
  3. İstanbul.
  4. Biel, Robert (2006), “The Interplay Between Social and Environmental Degradation in the Development of the International Political Economy”, Journal of World- Systems Research, 12, s.109-147.
  5. Birch, Kean – Levidow, Les – Papaioannaou, Theo (2010) “Sustainable Capital? The Neoliberalization of Nature and Knowledge in the European ‘Knowledge Based Bio-economy”, Sustainability, 2, s. 2898-2918.
  6. Bivell, Victor (2008) “What is Environmental Investment?” http://www.ecoinvestor.com.au/Articles/What_Is_Environmental_Investment.htm (18.02.2013).
  7. Blauwhof, Frederik (2012), “Overcoming Accumulation: Is a Capitalist Steady-state Economy Possible?” Ecological Economics, 84, s.254-261.
  8. Bookchin, Murray (1999), Toplumu Yeniden Kurmak (Çev. Kaya Şahin), Metis Yayınları,
  9. İstanbul.
  10. Boyd, William – Prudham, Scott – Schurman, Rachel (2001), “Industrial Dynamics and the Problem of Nature” Society and Natural Resources, 14, s. 555-570.
  11. Brown, Lester (2009), Dünyayı Nasıl Tükettik? (Çev. M.Fehmi İmre), Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları,
  12. İstanbul.
  13. Bumpus, Adam - Liverman, Diana (2008), “Accumulation by Decarbonization and the Governance of Carbon Offsets”, Economic Geography, 84, s. 127-155.
  14. Burkett, Paul (2004), Marx ve Doğa: Al-Yeşil Bir Perspektif (Çev. Ercüment Özkaya), Epos Yayınları,
  15. Ankara.
  16. Burkett, Paul (2006), “Kapitalizm, Doğa ve Sınıf Mücadelesi”, Alfred S. Filho (Ed.), Kapitalizme Reddiye: Marksist Bir Giriş, Yordam Kitap, İstanbul, s.130-142.
  17. Burkett, Paul (2008), Marksizm ve Ekolojik İktisat: Kızıl ve Yeşil Bir Ekonomi Politiğe Doğru (Çev. Ertan Günçiner), Yordam Kitap, İstanbul.
  18. Büscher, Bram – Sullivan, Sian – Neves, Katja – Igoe, Jim – Brockington, Dan (2012), “Towards a Synthesized Critique of Neoliberal Biodiversity Conservation”, Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 23, s.4-30.
  19. Carroll, Nathaniel – Jenkins, Michael (2009), “The Matrix: Mapping Ecosystem Service Markets”, Katoombo Group’s (Ed.), Beyond Carbon: Biodiversity and WaterMarkets. Clark, Brett - York, Richard (2010), “Rifts and Shifts: Getting to the Root of Environmental Crises”, Monthly Review, 22, s.63-77.
  20. Costanza, Robert (2003), “Social Goals and the Valuation of Natural Capital”, E