Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3

Women's Citizenship and Feminist Theory

Kadınların Yurttaşlığı ve Feminist Kuram

Pages
59–87
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article aims to reveal how prevailing citizenship approaches and the traditions of political thought, which they are based on, set the ground for women's 'incomplete' citizenship through analyses of feminist theorizing

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Citizenship, as one of the fundamental concepts of Western political thought, institutionalizes individuals' relationship with the state and the political power.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Throughout the history, women have been excluded from citizenship and the public sphere.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article aims to reveal how prevailing citizenship approaches and the traditions of political thought, which they are based on, set the ground for women's 'incomplete' citizenship through analyses of feminist theorizing
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Citizenship, as one of the fundamental concepts of Western political thought, institutionalizes individuals' relationship with the state and the political power. Throughout the history, women have been excluded from citizenship and the public sphere. Although women have attained social, economic, and civic rights in the course of time, this did not provide them full citizenship, because political and public spaces, in which citizenship is conceptualized and practiced, are based on male characteristics. This article aims to reveal how prevailing citizenship approaches and the traditions of political thought, which they are based on, set the ground for women's 'incomplete' citizenship through analyses of feminist theorizing

Özet

Batı siyasal düşüncesinin temel kavramlarından olan yurttaşlık, bir statü ve bir pratik olarak, bireylerin siyasal iktidar ve devletle ilişkisini kurumsallaştırmaktadır. Tarihin her döneminde kadınlar, kamusal alandan ve yurttaşlıktan dışlanmıştır. Zaman içinde kadınların sosyal, ekonomik ve medenî haklara sahip olmaları, tam olarak yurttaş olmalarını sağlayamamıştır. Çünkü yurttaşlığın kavramsallaştırıldığı ve hayata geçirildiği siyasal ve kamusal alanlar erkek özelliklerini esas almaktadır. Bu makalenin amacı, hâkim yurttaşlık yaklaşımlarının ve dayandıkları siyasal düşünce geleneklerinin kadınların 'eksik' yurttaşlığına nasıl zemin hazırladıklarını, feminist kuramlaştırmanın analizleriyle ortaya koymaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

KARTAL, F. (2016). Women's Citizenship and Feminist Theory. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 3, 59–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/148430

References (14)

  1. Abramovitz, M. (2012), "Hâlâ Bombardıman Altında: Kadınlar ve Sosyal Yardım Reformu", Holmstrom, N. (Ed.), Sosyalist Feminist Proje: Teori ve Politikanın Günümüz Okuması, Cilt 2, (Çev. Ö. Kelekçi), Kalkedon, İstanbul, s. 7-29.
  2. Balibar, E. (1988), "Propositions on Citizenship", Ethics, Vol. 98, s. 723-30.
  3. Bauman, Z. (2005), "Freedom from in and through the State: T.H. Marshall's Trinity of Rights Revisited", Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, Vol. 44, s. 13- 27. Benhabib, S. (2005) "Disintegration of Citizenship Rights", Parallax, Vol. 11, No:, s. 10-18.
  4. Bloemraad, I., Korteweg, A. ve Yurdakul, G. (2008), "Citizenship and Immigration: Multiculturalism, Assimilation, and Challenges to the Nation-State", Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 34, s. 153-179.
  5. Bock, G. ve James, S. (1992), "Introduction: Contextualizing Equality and Difference", Bock, G. ve James, S. (Ed.), Beyond Equality and Difference: Citizenship, Feminist Politics and Female Subjectivity, Routledge, London, NY, s. 1-12.
  6. Bottomore, T. (2000), "Kırk Yıl Sonra Yurttaşlık ve Toplumsal Sınıflar", Marshall, T. H. ve Bottomore, T., Yurttaşlık ve Toplumsal Sınıflar, (Çev.) A. Kaya, Gündoğan Yayınları, Ankara. Brown, (2006), "Finding the Man in the State", Sharma, A. ve Gupta, A. (Ed.), The Anthropology of the State: A Reader, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Oxford, Carlton, s. 187-210.
  7. Brush, L. D. (2003),
  8. Gender and Governance, AltaMira Press,
  9. Oxford. Bryson, V. (2003), Feminist Political Theory: An Introduction, 2nd Ed., Palgrave Macmillan, NY. Bussemaker, J. ve Voet, R. (1998), "Citizenship and Gender: Theoretical Approaches and Historical Legacies", Critical Social Policy, Vol. 18, No: 3, s. 277-307.
  10. Butler, J. (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge. Connell, R. W. (1990), "The State, Gender, and Sexual Politics: Theory and Appraisal", Theory and Society, Vol. 19, No: 5, s. 507-544.
  11. Connell, R. W. ve Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005), Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept", Gender and Society, Vol. 19, No. 6, s. 829-59.
  12. Coole, D. (1994), "Women, Gender and Contract: Feminist Interpretations", Boucher, D. ve Kelly, P. (Ed.), The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls, Routledge, London, NY, s. 193-211.
  13. Dietz, M. G. (1985), "Citizenship with a Feminist Face: The Problem with Maternal Thinking", Political Theory, Vol. 13, No. 1, s. 19-37.
  14. Eisenstein, Z. (1999), "Constructing a Theory of Capitalist Patriarchy and Socialism Feminism", Critical