Journals / Atmospheric Pollution Research / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of three prediction strategies within PM2.5 and PM10 monitoring networks

Pages
590–597
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings provide a possibility to estimate the missing or unmonitored values in term of the available data at surrounding stations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:An air pollution monitoring network is a primary tool for measuring, managing and assessing air quality in urban areas.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With this consideration, this study aims to explore some strategies for prediction instead of measurement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings provide a possibility to estimate the missing or unmonitored values in term of the available data at surrounding stations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

An air pollution monitoring network is a primary tool for measuring, managing and assessing air quality in urban areas. But plenty of equipment in monitoring network inevitably result in financial costs. With this consideration, this study aims to explore some strategies for prediction instead of measurement. To do so, the relationships within PM2.5 and PM10 monitoring networks are first explored respectively. Then the relationship between PM2.5 with PM10 monitoring networks is also investigated. Based on these identified relationships, three prediction strategies are proposed and PM2.5 concentration is selected for predictions. The results verified that PM2.5 concentration can be well estimated under these strategies, in particular the local strategy based on the local pollutants and mixed strategy based on the local and surrounding pollutants. That means, without measurement, the pollution levels of some pollutants can be successfully determined through prediction. These findings provide a possibility to estimate the missing or unmonitored values in term of the available data at surrounding stations.

🔖

Cite This Article

HE, H., LU, W. (2020). Comparison of three prediction strategies within PM2.5 and PM10 monitoring networks. Atmospheric Pollution Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 590–597. https://ajindex.com/articles/148301

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Antanasijevic, D.Z., Pocajt, V.V., Povrenovic, D.S., Ristic, M.D., Peric-Grujic, A.A., 2013. PM10 emission forecasting using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm input variable optimization. Sci. Total Environ. 443, 511–519.
  2. Bendu, H., Deepak, B.B.V.L., Murugan, S., 2016. Application of GRNN for the prediction of performance and exhaust emissions in HCCI engine using ethanol. Energy Convers. Manag. 122, 165–173.
  3. Cesari, D., De Benedetto, G.E., Bonasoni, P., Busetto, M., Dinoi, A., Merico, E., Chirizzi, D., Cristofanelli, P., Donateo, A., Grasso, F.M., 2018. Seasonal variability of PM2.5 and PM10 composition and sources in an urban background site in Southern Italy. Sci. Total Environ. 612, 202–213.
  4. Chen, M., Wang, P., Chen, Q., Wu, J., Chen, X., 2015. A clustering algorithm for sample data based on environmental pollution characteristics. Atmos. Environ. 107, 194–203.
  5. Dincer, N.G., Yalcin, M.O., 2016. Revealing information and equipment redundancies in air pollution monitoring networks in Turkey. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 2927–2938.
  6. Duyzer, J., van den Hout, D., Zandveld, P., van Ratingen, S., 2015. Representativeness of air quality monitoring networks. Atmos. Environ. 104, 88–101.
  7. Fan, Z.L., Chen, X.C., Lui, K.H., Ho, S.S.H., Cao, J.J., Lee, S.C., Huang, H., Ho, K.F., 2017. Relationships between outdoor and personal exposure of carbonaceous species and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) at Hong Kong. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 17, 666–679.
  8. Fang, X.Q., Fan, Q., Liao, Z.H., Xie, J.L., Xu, X.Q., Fan, S.J., 2019. Spatial-temporal characteristics of the air quality in the guangdong – Hong Kong - Macau greater bay area of China during 2015-2017. Atmos. Environ. 210, 14–34.
  9. Franceschi, F., Cobo, M., Figueredo, M., 2018. Discovering relationships and forecasting PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in bogota, Colombia, using artificial neural networks, principal component analysis, and k-means clustering. Atmospheric Pollution Research 9, 912–922.
  10. Gao, S.H., Wang, Y.J., Huang, Y.X., Zhou, Q., Liu, Z.M., Shi, X., Liu, Y.L., 2016. Spatial statistics of atmospheric particulate matter in China. Atmos. Environ. 134, 162–167.
  11. Guler, N., Isci, O.G., 2016. The regional prediction model of PM10 concentrations for Turkey. Atmos. Res. 180, 64–77.
  12. Gupta, S.K., Elumalai, S.P., 2019. Exposure to traffic-related particulate matter and deposition dose to auto rickshaw driver in Dhanbad, India. Atmospheric Pollution Rese