SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Critical Care / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2

Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis

Pulmoner Emboli Skorlarının Tromboliz Tahmininde Kullanımına İlişkin Metodolojik Kaygılar

Ahmet Aykut(Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Van Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi)0009-0001-3173-8994
Pages
109–110
Publication Date
2026-08-10
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This letter discusses methodological concerns regarding the use of diagnostic and prognostic pulmonary embolism scoring systems for predicting thrombolysis requirement in acute pulmonary embolism patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This letter discusses methodological concerns regarding the use of diagnostic and prognostic pulmonary embolism scoring systems for predicting thrombolysis requirement in acute pulmonary embolism patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This letter discusses methodological concerns regarding the use of diagnostic and prognostic pulmonary embolism scoring systems for predicting thrombolysis requirement in acute pulmonary embolism patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This letter discusses methodological concerns regarding the use of diagnostic and prognostic pulmonary embolism scoring systems for predicting thrombolysis requirement in acute pulmonary embolism patients.
🔬Design:Editöre Mektup
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pulmoner emboli · Tromboliz · Risk sınıflandırması

Abstract

This letter discusses methodological concerns regarding the use of diagnostic and prognostic pulmonary embolism scoring systems for predicting thrombolysis requirement in acute pulmonary embolism patients.

Özet

Bu mektup, akut pulmoner emboli hastalarında tromboliz ihtiyacını öngörmek için kullanılan tanısal ve prognostik pulmoner emboli skorlama sistemlerine ilişkin metodolojik endişeleri ele almaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aykut, A. (2026). Methodological Concerns Regarding the Use of Standard Pulmonary Embolism Scores for Predicting Thrombolysis. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 109–110. https://doi.org/10.55994/ejcc.1951605

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Ebor J, Rangnani A, Rani JN, Ganesan P. The role of standard scoring systems in predicting early thrombolysis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department: A retrospective cohort study. Eurasian Journal of Critical Care. 2026;8(1):1-7.
  2. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the model’s utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83(3):416-420.
  3. Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(3):165-171.
  4. Jiménez D, Aujesky D, Moores L, et al. Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(15):1383-1389.
  5. Konstantinides SV, Meyer G, Becattini C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(4):543-603.
  6. Rivera-Lebron B, McDaniel M, Ahrar K, et al.; PERT Consortium. Diagnosis, treatment and follow up of acute pulmonary embolism: consensus practice from the PERT Consortium. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2019;25:1076029619853037.